Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“decrease in A”

6 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

2000

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W2000957377 ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

METS significantly decreased pollen viability.

Taxon: Lycopersicon esculentumSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: METSe0
Outcome: pollen viabilitye0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: controle1

Verbatim

e0
“METS did not cause a significant change in biomass, the number of flowers, or the number of pollen grains produced, but there was a significant decrease in the number of fruit set, pollen viability and the number of pollen grains released”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–951

t0
“Lycopersicon esculentum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98

e1
“28/22 degrees C (day/night temperatures) as a control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–509

Title

Moderate Increase of Mean Daily Temperature Adversely Affects Fruit Set of Lycopersicon esculentum by Disrupting Specific Physiological Processes in Male Reproductive Development

S. SATO; M. KAMIYAMA; T. IWATA; et al. Annals of Botany 2006. doi:10.1093/aob/mcl037

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect METS did not significantly change biomass.
Intervention effect METS did not significantly change number of flowers.
Intervention effect METS did not significantly change number of pollen grains produced.
Intervention effect METS significantly decreased number of fruit set.
Intervention effect METS significantly decreased number of pollen grains released.
Intervention effect Glucose content in the androecium was generally higher in control than METS.
Intervention effect fructose content in the androecium was generally higher in control than METS.
Intervention effect Sucrose content in the androecium was higher under METS.
Intervention effect METS decreased acid invertase transcript abundance in the androecium.
Intervention effect Proline content in the androecium was almost the same under METS and control.
Intervention effect METS significantly decreased the transcript level of proline transporter 1.
Mechanism The authors attribute failure of tomato fruit set under moderate warming to disrupted sugar metabolism and proline translocation during male reproductive development.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

METS significantly decreased number of fruit set.

Taxon: Lycopersicon esculentumSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: METSe0
Outcome: number of fruit sete0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: controle1

Verbatim

e0
“METS did not cause a significant change in biomass, the number of flowers, or the number of pollen grains produced, but there was a significant decrease in the number of fruit set, pollen viability and the number of pollen grains released”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–951

t0
“Lycopersicon esculentum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98

e1
“28/22 degrees C (day/night temperatures) as a control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–509

Title

Moderate Increase of Mean Daily Temperature Adversely Affects Fruit Set of Lycopersicon esculentum by Disrupting Specific Physiological Processes in Male Reproductive Development

S. SATO; M. KAMIYAMA; T. IWATA; et al. Annals of Botany 2006. doi:10.1093/aob/mcl037

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect METS did not significantly change biomass.
Intervention effect METS did not significantly change number of flowers.
Intervention effect METS did not significantly change number of pollen grains produced.
Intervention effect METS significantly decreased pollen viability.
Intervention effect METS significantly decreased number of pollen grains released.
Intervention effect Glucose content in the androecium was generally higher in control than METS.
Intervention effect fructose content in the androecium was generally higher in control than METS.
Intervention effect Sucrose content in the androecium was higher under METS.
Intervention effect METS decreased acid invertase transcript abundance in the androecium.
Intervention effect Proline content in the androecium was almost the same under METS and control.
Intervention effect METS significantly decreased the transcript level of proline transporter 1.
Mechanism The authors attribute failure of tomato fruit set under moderate warming to disrupted sugar metabolism and proline translocation during male reproductive development.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

METS significantly decreased number of pollen grains released.

Taxon: Lycopersicon esculentumSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: METSe0
Outcome: number of pollen grains releasede0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: controle1

Verbatim

e0
“METS did not cause a significant change in biomass, the number of flowers, or the number of pollen grains produced, but there was a significant decrease in the number of fruit set, pollen viability and the number of pollen grains released”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–951

t0
“Lycopersicon esculentum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98

e1
“28/22 degrees C (day/night temperatures) as a control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–509

Title

Moderate Increase of Mean Daily Temperature Adversely Affects Fruit Set of Lycopersicon esculentum by Disrupting Specific Physiological Processes in Male Reproductive Development

S. SATO; M. KAMIYAMA; T. IWATA; et al. Annals of Botany 2006. doi:10.1093/aob/mcl037

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect METS did not significantly change biomass.
Intervention effect METS did not significantly change number of flowers.
Intervention effect METS did not significantly change number of pollen grains produced.
Intervention effect METS significantly decreased number of fruit set.
Intervention effect METS significantly decreased pollen viability.
Intervention effect Glucose content in the androecium was generally higher in control than METS.
Intervention effect fructose content in the androecium was generally higher in control than METS.
Intervention effect Sucrose content in the androecium was higher under METS.
Intervention effect METS decreased acid invertase transcript abundance in the androecium.
Intervention effect Proline content in the androecium was almost the same under METS and control.
Intervention effect METS significantly decreased the transcript level of proline transporter 1.
Mechanism The authors attribute failure of tomato fruit set under moderate warming to disrupted sugar metabolism and proline translocation during male reproductive development.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

METS did not significantly change biomass.

Taxon: Lycopersicon esculentumSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: METSe0
Outcome: biomasse0
Direction: did not cause a significant changee0
Comparator: controle1

Verbatim

e0
“METS did not cause a significant change in biomass, the number of flowers, or the number of pollen grains produced, but there was a significant decrease in the number of fruit set, pollen viability and the number of pollen grains released”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–951

t0
“Lycopersicon esculentum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98

e1
“28/22 degrees C (day/night temperatures) as a control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–509

Title

Moderate Increase of Mean Daily Temperature Adversely Affects Fruit Set of Lycopersicon esculentum by Disrupting Specific Physiological Processes in Male Reproductive Development

S. SATO; M. KAMIYAMA; T. IWATA; et al. Annals of Botany 2006. doi:10.1093/aob/mcl037

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect METS did not significantly change number of flowers.
Intervention effect METS did not significantly change number of pollen grains produced.
Intervention effect METS significantly decreased number of fruit set.
Intervention effect METS significantly decreased pollen viability.
Intervention effect METS significantly decreased number of pollen grains released.
Intervention effect Glucose content in the androecium was generally higher in control than METS.
Intervention effect fructose content in the androecium was generally higher in control than METS.
Intervention effect Sucrose content in the androecium was higher under METS.
Intervention effect METS decreased acid invertase transcript abundance in the androecium.
Intervention effect Proline content in the androecium was almost the same under METS and control.
Intervention effect METS significantly decreased the transcript level of proline transporter 1.
Mechanism The authors attribute failure of tomato fruit set under moderate warming to disrupted sugar metabolism and proline translocation during male reproductive development.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

METS did not significantly change number of flowers.

Taxon: Lycopersicon esculentumSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: METSe0
Outcome: number of flowerse0
Direction: did not cause a significant changee0
Comparator: controle1

Verbatim

e0
“METS did not cause a significant change in biomass, the number of flowers, or the number of pollen grains produced, but there was a significant decrease in the number of fruit set, pollen viability and the number of pollen grains released”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–951

t0
“Lycopersicon esculentum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98

e1
“28/22 degrees C (day/night temperatures) as a control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–509

Title

Moderate Increase of Mean Daily Temperature Adversely Affects Fruit Set of Lycopersicon esculentum by Disrupting Specific Physiological Processes in Male Reproductive Development

S. SATO; M. KAMIYAMA; T. IWATA; et al. Annals of Botany 2006. doi:10.1093/aob/mcl037

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect METS did not significantly change biomass.
Intervention effect METS did not significantly change number of pollen grains produced.
Intervention effect METS significantly decreased number of fruit set.
Intervention effect METS significantly decreased pollen viability.
Intervention effect METS significantly decreased number of pollen grains released.
Intervention effect Glucose content in the androecium was generally higher in control than METS.
Intervention effect fructose content in the androecium was generally higher in control than METS.
Intervention effect Sucrose content in the androecium was higher under METS.
Intervention effect METS decreased acid invertase transcript abundance in the androecium.
Intervention effect Proline content in the androecium was almost the same under METS and control.
Intervention effect METS significantly decreased the transcript level of proline transporter 1.
Mechanism The authors attribute failure of tomato fruit set under moderate warming to disrupted sugar metabolism and proline translocation during male reproductive development.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

METS did not significantly change number of pollen grains produced.

Taxon: Lycopersicon esculentumSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: METSe0
Outcome: number of pollen grains producede0
Direction: did not cause a significant changee0
Comparator: controle1

Verbatim

e0
“METS did not cause a significant change in biomass, the number of flowers, or the number of pollen grains produced, but there was a significant decrease in the number of fruit set, pollen viability and the number of pollen grains released”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–951

t0
“Lycopersicon esculentum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98

e1
“28/22 degrees C (day/night temperatures) as a control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–509

Title

Moderate Increase of Mean Daily Temperature Adversely Affects Fruit Set of Lycopersicon esculentum by Disrupting Specific Physiological Processes in Male Reproductive Development

S. SATO; M. KAMIYAMA; T. IWATA; et al. Annals of Botany 2006. doi:10.1093/aob/mcl037

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect METS did not significantly change biomass.
Intervention effect METS did not significantly change number of flowers.
Intervention effect METS significantly decreased number of fruit set.
Intervention effect METS significantly decreased pollen viability.
Intervention effect METS significantly decreased number of pollen grains released.
Intervention effect Glucose content in the androecium was generally higher in control than METS.
Intervention effect fructose content in the androecium was generally higher in control than METS.
Intervention effect Sucrose content in the androecium was higher under METS.
Intervention effect METS decreased acid invertase transcript abundance in the androecium.
Intervention effect Proline content in the androecium was almost the same under METS and control.
Intervention effect METS significantly decreased the transcript level of proline transporter 1.
Mechanism The authors attribute failure of tomato fruit set under moderate warming to disrupted sugar metabolism and proline translocation during male reproductive development.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“decrease in A”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics