Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“decrease in A”

13 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

2020

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W3023101426 ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging significantly lowered water use in BTK.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: BTKe0
Treatment: waterlogging treatmente0
Outcome: water usee0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: controlse0

Verbatim

e0
“The waterlogging treatment resulted in a significant decrease in plant biomass (BKT, TOB), number of spikes (TOB), grain yield (BKT, TOB), water use (BTK) and water-use efficiency (TOB, MAM, PAL) compared to the controls.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–910

t0
“Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–119

Title

Effects of Waterlogging, Drought and Their Combination on Yield and Water-Use Efficiency of Five Hungarian Winter Wheat Varieties

Zsuzsanna Farkas; Emese Varga-László; Angéla Anda; et al. Water 2020. doi:10.3390/w12051318

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered biomass in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered spike number in TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered grain yield in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water-use efficiency in TOB, MAM and PAL.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered plant height in BTK, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered spike number in BTK, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered thousand kernel weight in TOB.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered harvest index in BTK.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered biomass in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered grain yield in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water-use efficiency in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water use in BKT, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Observation MAM had the best water-use efficiency.
Recommendation Authors recommend MAM for stress-prone cultivation areas.
Observation MAM showed good adaptability.
Observation KAR showed good adaptability.
Observation PAL showed good adaptability.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging significantly lowered spike number in TOB.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: TOBe0
Treatment: waterlogging treatmente0
Outcome: number of spikese0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: controlse0

Verbatim

e0
“The waterlogging treatment resulted in a significant decrease in plant biomass (BKT, TOB), number of spikes (TOB), grain yield (BKT, TOB), water use (BTK) and water-use efficiency (TOB, MAM, PAL) compared to the controls.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–910

t0
“Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–119

Title

Effects of Waterlogging, Drought and Their Combination on Yield and Water-Use Efficiency of Five Hungarian Winter Wheat Varieties

Zsuzsanna Farkas; Emese Varga-László; Angéla Anda; et al. Water 2020. doi:10.3390/w12051318

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered biomass in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered grain yield in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water use in BTK.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water-use efficiency in TOB, MAM and PAL.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered plant height in BTK, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered spike number in BTK, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered thousand kernel weight in TOB.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered harvest index in BTK.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered biomass in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered grain yield in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water-use efficiency in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water use in BKT, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Observation MAM had the best water-use efficiency.
Recommendation Authors recommend MAM for stress-prone cultivation areas.
Observation MAM showed good adaptability.
Observation KAR showed good adaptability.
Observation PAL showed good adaptability.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging significantly lowered biomass in BKT and TOB.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: BKT, TOBe0
Treatment: waterlogging treatmente0
Outcome: plant biomasse0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: controlse0

Verbatim

e0
“The waterlogging treatment resulted in a significant decrease in plant biomass (BKT, TOB), number of spikes (TOB), grain yield (BKT, TOB), water use (BTK) and water-use efficiency (TOB, MAM, PAL) compared to the controls.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–910

t0
“Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–119

Title

Effects of Waterlogging, Drought and Their Combination on Yield and Water-Use Efficiency of Five Hungarian Winter Wheat Varieties

Zsuzsanna Farkas; Emese Varga-László; Angéla Anda; et al. Water 2020. doi:10.3390/w12051318

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered spike number in TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered grain yield in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water use in BTK.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water-use efficiency in TOB, MAM and PAL.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered plant height in BTK, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered spike number in BTK, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered thousand kernel weight in TOB.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered harvest index in BTK.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered biomass in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered grain yield in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water-use efficiency in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water use in BKT, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Observation MAM had the best water-use efficiency.
Recommendation Authors recommend MAM for stress-prone cultivation areas.
Observation MAM showed good adaptability.
Observation KAR showed good adaptability.
Observation PAL showed good adaptability.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging significantly lowered grain yield in BKT and TOB.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: BKT, TOBe0
Treatment: waterlogging treatmente0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: controlse0

Verbatim

e0
“The waterlogging treatment resulted in a significant decrease in plant biomass (BKT, TOB), number of spikes (TOB), grain yield (BKT, TOB), water use (BTK) and water-use efficiency (TOB, MAM, PAL) compared to the controls.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–910

t0
“Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–119

Title

Effects of Waterlogging, Drought and Their Combination on Yield and Water-Use Efficiency of Five Hungarian Winter Wheat Varieties

Zsuzsanna Farkas; Emese Varga-László; Angéla Anda; et al. Water 2020. doi:10.3390/w12051318

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered biomass in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered spike number in TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water use in BTK.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water-use efficiency in TOB, MAM and PAL.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered plant height in BTK, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered spike number in BTK, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered thousand kernel weight in TOB.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered harvest index in BTK.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered biomass in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered grain yield in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water-use efficiency in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water use in BKT, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Observation MAM had the best water-use efficiency.
Recommendation Authors recommend MAM for stress-prone cultivation areas.
Observation MAM showed good adaptability.
Observation KAR showed good adaptability.
Observation PAL showed good adaptability.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging significantly lowered water-use efficiency in TOB, MAM and PAL.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: TOB, MAM, PALe0
Treatment: waterlogging treatmente0
Outcome: water-use efficiencye0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: controlse0

Verbatim

e0
“The waterlogging treatment resulted in a significant decrease in plant biomass (BKT, TOB), number of spikes (TOB), grain yield (BKT, TOB), water use (BTK) and water-use efficiency (TOB, MAM, PAL) compared to the controls.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–910

t0
“Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–119

Title

Effects of Waterlogging, Drought and Their Combination on Yield and Water-Use Efficiency of Five Hungarian Winter Wheat Varieties

Zsuzsanna Farkas; Emese Varga-László; Angéla Anda; et al. Water 2020. doi:10.3390/w12051318

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered biomass in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered spike number in TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered grain yield in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water use in BTK.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered plant height in BTK, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered spike number in BTK, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered thousand kernel weight in TOB.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered harvest index in BTK.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered biomass in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered grain yield in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water-use efficiency in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water use in BKT, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Observation MAM had the best water-use efficiency.
Recommendation Authors recommend MAM for stress-prone cultivation areas.
Observation MAM showed good adaptability.
Observation KAR showed good adaptability.
Observation PAL showed good adaptability.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined stress significantly lowered harvest index in BTK.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: BTKe0
Treatment: WL + De0
Outcome: harvest indexe0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: control treatment (C)t1

Verbatim

e0
“The combined treatment (WL + D) led to a significant decrease in plant height (BTK, MAM, KAR), number of spikes (BTK, TOB, MAM, KAR), thousand kernel weight (TOB), harvest index (BTK), biomass, grain yield, water-use efficiency (in all varieties) and water use (BKT, TOB, MAM, KAR) of the plants.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1207

t0
“Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–119

t1
“control treatment (C)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–374

Title

Effects of Waterlogging, Drought and Their Combination on Yield and Water-Use Efficiency of Five Hungarian Winter Wheat Varieties

Zsuzsanna Farkas; Emese Varga-László; Angéla Anda; et al. Water 2020. doi:10.3390/w12051318

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered biomass in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered spike number in TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered grain yield in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water use in BTK.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water-use efficiency in TOB, MAM and PAL.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered plant height in BTK, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered spike number in BTK, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered thousand kernel weight in TOB.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered biomass in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered grain yield in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water-use efficiency in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water use in BKT, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Observation MAM had the best water-use efficiency.
Recommendation Authors recommend MAM for stress-prone cultivation areas.
Observation MAM showed good adaptability.
Observation KAR showed good adaptability.
Observation PAL showed good adaptability.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined stress significantly lowered biomass in all varieties.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: WL + De0
Outcome: biomasse0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: in all varietiese0
Comparator: control treatment (C)t1

Verbatim

e0
“The combined treatment (WL + D) led to a significant decrease in plant height (BTK, MAM, KAR), number of spikes (BTK, TOB, MAM, KAR), thousand kernel weight (TOB), harvest index (BTK), biomass, grain yield, water-use efficiency (in all varieties) and water use (BKT, TOB, MAM, KAR) of the plants.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1207

t0
“Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–119

t1
“control treatment (C)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–374

Title

Effects of Waterlogging, Drought and Their Combination on Yield and Water-Use Efficiency of Five Hungarian Winter Wheat Varieties

Zsuzsanna Farkas; Emese Varga-László; Angéla Anda; et al. Water 2020. doi:10.3390/w12051318

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered biomass in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered spike number in TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered grain yield in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water use in BTK.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water-use efficiency in TOB, MAM and PAL.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered plant height in BTK, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered spike number in BTK, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered thousand kernel weight in TOB.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered harvest index in BTK.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered grain yield in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water-use efficiency in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water use in BKT, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Observation MAM had the best water-use efficiency.
Recommendation Authors recommend MAM for stress-prone cultivation areas.
Observation MAM showed good adaptability.
Observation KAR showed good adaptability.
Observation PAL showed good adaptability.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined stress significantly lowered thousand kernel weight in TOB.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: TOBe0
Treatment: WL + De0
Outcome: thousand kernel weighte0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: control treatment (C)t1

Verbatim

e0
“The combined treatment (WL + D) led to a significant decrease in plant height (BTK, MAM, KAR), number of spikes (BTK, TOB, MAM, KAR), thousand kernel weight (TOB), harvest index (BTK), biomass, grain yield, water-use efficiency (in all varieties) and water use (BKT, TOB, MAM, KAR) of the plants.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1207

t0
“Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–119

t1
“control treatment (C)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–374

Title

Effects of Waterlogging, Drought and Their Combination on Yield and Water-Use Efficiency of Five Hungarian Winter Wheat Varieties

Zsuzsanna Farkas; Emese Varga-László; Angéla Anda; et al. Water 2020. doi:10.3390/w12051318

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered biomass in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered spike number in TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered grain yield in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water use in BTK.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water-use efficiency in TOB, MAM and PAL.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered plant height in BTK, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered spike number in BTK, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered harvest index in BTK.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered biomass in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered grain yield in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water-use efficiency in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water use in BKT, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Observation MAM had the best water-use efficiency.
Recommendation Authors recommend MAM for stress-prone cultivation areas.
Observation MAM showed good adaptability.
Observation KAR showed good adaptability.
Observation PAL showed good adaptability.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined stress significantly lowered grain yield in all varieties.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: WL + De0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: in all varietiese0
Comparator: control treatment (C)t1

Verbatim

e0
“The combined treatment (WL + D) led to a significant decrease in plant height (BTK, MAM, KAR), number of spikes (BTK, TOB, MAM, KAR), thousand kernel weight (TOB), harvest index (BTK), biomass, grain yield, water-use efficiency (in all varieties) and water use (BKT, TOB, MAM, KAR) of the plants.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1207

t0
“Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–119

t1
“control treatment (C)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–374

Title

Effects of Waterlogging, Drought and Their Combination on Yield and Water-Use Efficiency of Five Hungarian Winter Wheat Varieties

Zsuzsanna Farkas; Emese Varga-László; Angéla Anda; et al. Water 2020. doi:10.3390/w12051318

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered biomass in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered spike number in TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered grain yield in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water use in BTK.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water-use efficiency in TOB, MAM and PAL.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered plant height in BTK, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered spike number in BTK, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered thousand kernel weight in TOB.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered harvest index in BTK.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered biomass in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water-use efficiency in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water use in BKT, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Observation MAM had the best water-use efficiency.
Recommendation Authors recommend MAM for stress-prone cultivation areas.
Observation MAM showed good adaptability.
Observation KAR showed good adaptability.
Observation PAL showed good adaptability.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined stress significantly lowered water-use efficiency in all varieties.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: WL + De0
Outcome: water-use efficiencye0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: in all varietiese0
Comparator: control treatment (C)t1

Verbatim

e0
“The combined treatment (WL + D) led to a significant decrease in plant height (BTK, MAM, KAR), number of spikes (BTK, TOB, MAM, KAR), thousand kernel weight (TOB), harvest index (BTK), biomass, grain yield, water-use efficiency (in all varieties) and water use (BKT, TOB, MAM, KAR) of the plants.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1207

t0
“Winter Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–119

t1
“control treatment (C)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–374

Title

Effects of Waterlogging, Drought and Their Combination on Yield and Water-Use Efficiency of Five Hungarian Winter Wheat Varieties

Zsuzsanna Farkas; Emese Varga-László; Angéla Anda; et al. Water 2020. doi:10.3390/w12051318

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered biomass in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered spike number in TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered grain yield in BKT and TOB.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water use in BTK.
Intervention effect Waterlogging significantly lowered water-use efficiency in TOB, MAM and PAL.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered plant height in BTK, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered spike number in BTK, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered thousand kernel weight in TOB.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered harvest index in BTK.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered biomass in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered grain yield in all varieties.
Intervention effect Combined stress significantly lowered water use in BKT, TOB, MAM and KAR.
Observation MAM had the best water-use efficiency.
Recommendation Authors recommend MAM for stress-prone cultivation areas.
Observation MAM showed good adaptability.
Observation KAR showed good adaptability.
Observation PAL showed good adaptability.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“decrease in A”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics