Claim · model-written summary
The Sep. 10 yield was 4 percent below Aug. 30.
- Taxon
- Fritillaria thungergii MIQUELt0
- Treatment
- Sep. 10 plote0
- Outcome
- decreasee0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Value
- 4 percente0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“4 percent decrease in the Sep. 10 plot”
t0“Fritillaria thungergii MIQUEL”
Title
Effects of Planting Date and Density on Yield and It’s Components of Fritillaria thungergii MIQUEL
In-Sik Choi; Jin-Tae Cho; Seok-Yong Son; et al. Korean Journal of Medicinal Crop Science 1996
Other claims from this paper (18)
- Intervention effect Earlier planting dates led to earlier emergence.
- Intervention effect A 50-day planting delay caused a 14-day emergence delay.
- Observation Plant height was 22.7cms for the Aug. 20 plot.
- Intervention effect Later planting produced shorter plants.
- Intervention effect The Aug. 20 yield was 1 percent above the Aug. 30 yield.
- Intervention effect The Sep. 20 yield was 26 percent below Aug. 30.
- Intervention effect The Sep 30 yield was 35 percent below Aug. 30.
- Intervention effect The Oct. 10 yield was 38 percent below Aug. 30.
- Intervention effect Sparse planting delayed emergence by one to three days relative to 33 bulbs per square meter.
- Observation At 33 bulbs per square meter, plant height was 21. 8cms.
- Observation At 33 bulbs per square meter, shoot count was 6.1.
- Intervention effect The 22-bulb plot had 0.4 more shoots than the 33-bulb plot.
- Intervention effect The 17-bulb plot had 0.6 more shoots than the 33-bulb plot.
- Intervention effect The 13-bulb plot had 0.5 more shoots than the 33-bulb plot.
- Intervention effect The 33-bulb plot yielded 2 percent more than the 22-bulb plot.
- Intervention effect The 17-bulb plot yielded 16 percent less than the 22-bulb plot.
- Intervention effect The 13-bulb plot yielded 34 percent less than the 22-bulb plot.
- Recommendation The authors recommend Aug. 25 and 22 bulbs per square meter for cultivation in the middle region.