View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Firmness at harvest was unrelated to firmness after storage.
Outcomefirmness at harvest and after storage e0 Directionno relationship e0 Comparatorfirmness at harvest e0 Verbatim
e0 “there was no relationship between firmness at harvest and after storage. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1028 t0 “safou ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Pear firmness after storage was unrelated to firmness at harvest.
Taxon‘Conference’ pears t0 Outcomefirmness after storage e0 Comparatorfirmness at harvest e0 Verbatim
t0 “‘Conference’ pears ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–90 e0 “firmness after storage was not related to firmness at harvest or after the initial period of fruit cooling to –1°C ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–573 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Flesh tissue firmness values did not differ significantly.
Organ / stageflesh tissue e2 Outcomeflesh tissue firmness values e2 Verbatim
t0 “apple firmness ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–36 e2 “There was not significant difference between the flesh tissue firmness values ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–399 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The study found no overall relationship between fruit firmness and calcium concentration.
Directionno relationship e0 Verbatim
e0 “no relationship was found between fruit firmness and Ca concentration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1435 t0 “Strawberry Fruit Firmness ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 3–28 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Firmness and soluble solids content were not significantly correlated.
Outcomecorrelations between firmness and soluble solids content e0 Not reported Taxon Compound Organ / stage Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The correlations between firmness and soluble solids content were not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1406 Other claims from this paper (15) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
None of the studied factors had a significant effect on number of scales, equatorial firmness or polar firmness .
Treatmentstudied factors e5 Outcomenumber of scales, equatorial firmness and polar firmness e5 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “onion (Allium cepa L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 e5 “None of the studied factors had significant effect on bulb roundness, ellipsoid ratio, number of scales, equatorial firmness and polar firmness ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1874 Other claims from this paper (16) Association Planting date had a significant effect on physical properties of onion bulb. Observation The first planting date (10th May) gave the largest bulb width, 6.95 cm. Observation The first planting date gave the largest bulb length, 4.42 cm. Observation The first planting date gave the largest bulb thickness, 6.75 cm. Observation The first planting date gave the largest geometric mean diameter, 5.91 cm. Observation The first planting date gave the largest arithmetic mean diameter, 6.04 cm. Observation The first planting date gave the largest frontal surface, 24.26 cm2. Observation The first planting date gave the largest cross sectional area, 28.84 cm2. Observation The first planting date gave the largest total area, 110.63 cm2. Observation The same planting date gave the lowest bulb shape index, 0.64. Observation The same planting date gave the lowest sphericity, 0.85. Association Land management practices had no significant effect on physical properties of onion bulb. Association None of the studied factors had a significant effect on bulb roundness or ellipsoid ratio. Association Early planting of onion seedlings can increase bulb size. Observation Early planting helps maintain the flat and round shape of onion bulb. Association Land preparation method and plough depth had no significant influence on physical properties of onion bulb. Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Chitosan did not affect fruit firmness .
Treatmentchitosan application e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Fruit firmness was not affected by chitosan application. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1075 t0 “physalis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–35 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Species ancestry was not consistently related to blueberry firmness .
MaterialSpecies ancestry e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “Highbush Blueberry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 e0 “Species ancestry was not consistently related to firmness ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–491 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
There was no significant difference between fruit firmness and flesh firmness in pepper.
Outcomefruit firmness and flesh firmness e1 Verbatim
t0 “Capsicum Annuum L.) Lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–139 e0 “Five pepper(Capsicum Annuum L.) lines with different fruit firmness were selected to detect the fruit firmness and investigate the cell wall substrates such as primary pectin,soluble pectin,and cellulose content,the fruit tissue structure at different developmental stages of fruit was observed by means of paraffin section ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–323 e1 “The results showed that there was no significant difference between fruit firmness and flesh firmness ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–425 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Pear firmness after storage was unrelated to firmness after initial cooling to –1°C.
Taxon‘Conference’ pears t0 Outcomefirmness after storage e0 Comparatorafter the initial period of fruit cooling to –1°C e0 Verbatim
t0 “‘Conference’ pears ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–90 e0 “firmness after storage was not related to firmness at harvest or after the initial period of fruit cooling to –1°C ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–573 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.