View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Input costs were comparable between eco-friendly and conventional systems.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “coffee ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–16 e0 “Input costs were comparable between the two systems ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1767–1818 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Total costs differed little between high- input and reduced- input systems.
annual grain crops e7 little difference e0 RED-input treatments e0 Verbatim
e0 “we found little difference in total costs between the respective HIGH- and RED- input treatments. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2833–2929 t0 “cropping systems ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–100 e7 “annual grain crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–265 Other claims from this paper (16) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Input and labor costs were not related to bean profitability.
input and labor costs e0 Verbatim
e0 “Bean yield was the most influential factor affecting profitability, while input and labor costs were not related to profitability. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1168 t0 “BEAN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Hairy vetch as a legume cover crop before corn gave yields and input costs similar to red clover.
used as a legume cover crop prior to corn e3 yields and input costs e3 no_change inferred e3 Verbatim
e3 “Hairy vetch provided similar yields and input costs as red clover when used as a legume cover crop prior to corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–554 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Hybrid types did not differ in input costs , yield or returns within a year.
stacked‐gene, glyphosate‐tolerant, and non‐GMO hybrids e0 input costs, yield, or net returns per acre e0 did not differ e0 Verbatim
e0 “stacked‐gene, glyphosate‐tolerant, and non‐GMO hybrids did not differ in input costs , yield, or net returns per acre within a year ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–696 t0 “Corn Hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–98 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Regular and timely management practices in pulse seed production incurred no additional labour and special input costs .
additional labour and special input costs e6 so that no additional labour and special input costs were incurred e6 Verbatim
e3 “The total gross amount realized from pulses seed production programme in the four years (2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20) was INR 1.24 crores ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1114 e6 “Regular and timely management practices reduce additional expenditure while producing seeds, so that no additional labour and special input costs were incurred ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1662 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation A total of 1,091 quintals of pulse seed was procured by KVK, Palem, during 2016 to 2020. Observation KVK procured 284 quintals of Greengram (WGG 42) seed from farmers. Observation KVK procured 571 quintals of Redgram (PRG 176) seed from farmers. Observation KVK procured 234 quintals of Blackgram (PU 31) seed from farmers. Observation KVK procured 2.2 quintals of Horsegram (CHRG 19) seed from farmers. Observation Pulse seed production earned INR 13,49,989 as additional income for 51 farmers. Observation The total gross amount realized from pulse seed production over four years was INR 1.24 crores. Observation The net profit to KVK, Palem, from pulse seed production was INR 41,92,086. Observation The seed production programme generated employment opportunities for rural youth, farm workers and farm women. Intervention effect Socio-economic status of farmers improved through seed production compared with general cultivation. Observation Quality pulse seeds covered nearly 7,690 hectares through the intervention in Nagarkurnool district. Observation Quality pulse seeds contributed 16 to 18 per cent of the total cropped area under pulses in Nagarkurnool district. Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Input costs were the same across sainfoin varieties with and without mineral fertilizer.
both with the introduction of mineral fertilizers and without them e0 Verbatim
e0 “different varieties of sainfoin, both with the introduction of mineral fertilizers and without them, the costs were the same ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2918–3042 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower input and establishment costs offset lower yields, yielding similar gross margins.
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “which combined with lower crop establishment costs , compensated for the lower yields, resulting in similar gross margins as the other systems. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1396 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation author interpretation original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The authors found no significant benefit from reducing cotton plant density because lower seed costs were offset by higher irrigation costs .
benefit to reduced plant density e0 no significant benefit e0 southeastern U.S. e0 Verbatim
e0 “reductions in seed input cost estimates were offset by increased irrigation input cost, which allowed for no significant benefit to reduced plant density in cotton grown in the southeastern U.S. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1801–1995 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The T3 treatment maintained rice profit despite higher input costs .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Optimization of Rice Yield, Quality, and Profit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–63 e1 “Although the agricultural input s in the T2 and T3 treatments were higher, the profit from the increased grain yield could cover these input s, thereby maintaining profit with T3 or increasing profit with T2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1837 Other claims from this paper (16) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Coffea
Vicia villosa
Zea mays subsp. mays
Gossypium hirsutum
Oryza sativa