View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Most of 25 treatments showed no significant turf - quality difference between seedling and established turf .
Directionno significant differences e0 QualifierWith three exceptions e0 Comparatorestablished turf e0 Verbatim
e0 “With three exceptions, no significant differences in turf quality could be found between 25 treatments on seedling turf 4–12 weeks old and established turf . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–506 t0 “turf grasses ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–63 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Split prodiamine applications did not significantly decrease turf quality .
TreatmentSplit applications of prodiamine e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Split applications of prodiamine did not significantly decrease turf quality . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–584 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Lime had no influence on velvet bentgrass turf quality .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “velvet bentgrass putting turf ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–221 e4 “Lime had no influence on turf quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–354 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cold tolerance and turf quality were not significantly correlated.
TaxonSt. Augustinegrass t0 Outcomecold tolerance and turf quality traits e0 Not reported Material Direction
Verbatim
e0 “cold tolerance and turf quality traits, which were not significantly correlated with one another ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1407 t0 “St. Augustinegrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–83 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
There was no correlation between inflorescence emergence and turf quality .
Outcomecorrelation between inflorescence emergence and turf quality e0 Verbatim
t0 “Prairie Junegrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–46 e0 “no correlation between inflorescence emergence and turf quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1299 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Turf quality was not correlated with thatch depth.
Qualifiernot correlated with thatch depth e1 Verbatim
e1 “Turf quality was not correlated with thatch depth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1704–1753 t0 “Bermudagrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–35 Other claims from this paper (17) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
No difference in turf quality was detected among the other three tall fescue cultivars under tree shade.
Settingunder a Tree Shade t0 Verbatim
t0 “Tall Fescue Turf Performance under a Tree Shade ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–47 e2 “No difference between cultivars in turf quality was detected among ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–309 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest that flowering does not necessarily affect turf quality ratings.
Outcometurf quality ratings e0 Qualifierflowering does not necessarily affect e0 Verbatim
t0 “Prairie Junegrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–46 e0 “flowering does not necessarily affect turf quality ratings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1431 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Turf quality of creeping bentgrass was unaffected by silica application.
Treatmentsilica application e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Creeping Bentgrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–77 e1 “Turf quality was unaffected by silica application ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–800 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
BAS 514 gave equal turf quality and stand to fenoxaprop-ethyl.
Comparatorfenoxaprop-ethyl e0 Verbatim
e0 “Use of BAS 514 gave equal turf quality , phytotoxicity to the turf , large crabgrass control, and stand compared to fenoxaprop-ethyl. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–506 t0 “Kentucky bluegrass and bermudagrass turf ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–158 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.