Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression coefficients did not differ between seasons.

Outcome
regression coefficientse0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
seasonse0

Verbatim

e0

“The regression coefficients did not differ among seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–939
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–39

Title

A petiole sap nitrate test for broccoli

Aki Kubota; Thomas L. Thompson; Thomas A. Doerge; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 1997. doi:10.1080/01904169709365285

Other claims from this paper (6)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression coefficients for mowing and biomass did not differ between the two regression lines in either experiment.

Taxon
Cirsium arvenseCirsium arvenset0
Outcome
regression coefficientse0
Direction
no differencee0

Verbatim

e0

“in both experiments there was no difference between the regression coefficients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–825
t0

“Cirsium arvense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–37

Title

Mechanical control of Cirsium arvense in organic farming

Enrico Graglia; Bo Melander Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture) 2005

Other claims from this paper (4)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression coefficients were unaffected by cultivars.

Outcome
Regression coefficientse0
Direction
not affectede0

Verbatim

e0

“Regression coefficients were not affected by cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–961
e1

“Sugarbeet ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–38

Title

A Model to Estimate Harvest Losses Due to Taproot Breakage in Sugarbeet1

D. F. Cole Agronomy Journal 1986. doi:10.2134/agronj1986.00021962007800050037x

Other claims from this paper (4)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression coefficients did not differ among seasons.

Outcome
regression coefficientse0
Direction
did not differe0

Verbatim

e0

“The regression coefficients did not differ among seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1076
t0

“BROCCOLI AND CAULIFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–85

Title

PETIOLE SAP NITRATE TESTS FOR DETERMINING NITROGEN STATUS OF BROCCOLI AND CAULIFLOWER

Thomas L. Thompson; Aki Kubota; Thomas A. Doerge; et al. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) 1996

Other claims from this paper (4)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interallelic interaction was not detected by regression coefficients.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
interallelic interaction was not determinede0

Verbatim

e0

“By testing the coefficients of regression interallelic interaction was not determined.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1714
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–52

Title

Genetic advance and regression analysis in sunflower

Milan Jockovic; Sinisa Jocic; Slaven Prodanovic; et al. Genetika 2019. doi:10.2298/gensr1903075j

Other claims from this paper (11)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression coefficients did not differ between grasshopper species.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
Regression coefficientse4
Comparator
speciese4

Verbatim

t0

“Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–85
e4

“Regression coefficients were significantly different between nymphs and adults, but not between species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1013

Title

Comparison of Sampling Techniques for Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in Soybean

J. A. Browde; L. P. Pedigo; T. A. Degooyer; et al. Journal of Economic Entomology 1992. doi:10.1093/jee/85.6.2270

Other claims from this paper (7)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression coefficients showed no obvious differences among cultivars and growth stages.

Outcome
regression coefficientse0
Direction
no obvious differencese0

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106
e0

“there were no obvious differences on regression coefficients among different cultivars and growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1745–1849

Title

Relationship between Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters and Spectral Reflectance Characteristics in Wheat Leaves

Yong Tian ACTA AGRONOMICA SINICA 2007

Other claims from this paper (6)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid and pureline stability regression coefficients were not significantly different from one or each other.

Outcome
Regression coefficientse0
Direction
not significantly differente0

Verbatim

e0

“Regression coefficients for hybrids and purelines were not significantly different from one, nor from each other”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1110
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 32–37

Title

Hybrid and Pureline Hard Winter Wheat Yield and Stability

John E. Koemel; Arron C. Guenzi; Brett F. Carver; et al. Crop Science 2004. doi:10.2135/cropsci2004.1070

Other claims from this paper (5)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant regression coefficients were obtained during early prophase.

Organ / stage
early prophasee7
Outcome
regression coefficientse7

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“mean cell, nuclear, and nucleolar volumes were calculated at 10-h intervals in hexaploid triticale (× Triticosecale Wittmack cv. Rosner)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–215
e7

“However, no significant regression coefficients were obtained during early prophase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1118

Title

Growth during microsporogenesis in hexaploid triticale

R. L. White; P. J. Kaltsikes Canadian Journal of Botany 1978. doi:10.1139/b78-242

Other claims from this paper (11)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid and pureline stability regression coefficients did not differ significantly from one or each other.

Material
hybrids and purelinese0
Outcome
Regression coefficientse0
Direction
not significantly differente0

Verbatim

e0

“Regression coefficients for hybrids and purelines were not significantly different from one, nor from each other.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1110
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 32–37

Title

Hybrid and Pureline Hard Winter Wheat Yield and Stability

John E. Koemel; Arron C. Guenzi; Brett F. Carver; et al. Crop Science 2004. doi:10.2135/cropsci2004.0107

Other claims from this paper (7)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.