Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“subsections”

4 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

1980 ’90 2000 ’10

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean cultivar genome sizes were similar between subsections.

Taxon: PhloxPhloxe0
Outcome: mean genome sizese0
Direction: did not varye0
Value: 14.33 pge0
Comparator: subsections Paniculataee0

Verbatim

e0
“mean genome sizes that did not vary between subsections Paniculatae (14.33 pg) and Phlox (14.23 pg)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1093

Title

Genome Size and Ploidy of Phlox paniculata and Related Germplasm in Subsections Paniculatae and Phlox

Peter J. Zale; Pablo Jourdan Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 2015. doi:10.21273/jashs.140.5.436

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Most cultivars were diploid.
Association Genome size variation among cultivars was greater in subsection Phlox.
Observation Triploid P. paniculata cultivars were identified with a mean genome size of 21.36 pg.
Observation Five tetraploid P. glaberrima ssp. triflora cultivars had mean genome size 25.44 pg.
Observation Miss Lingard had an intermediate genome size supporting triploid hybrid origin.
Association Wild accession genome sizes resembled cultivar values.
Observation Wild subsection Phlox taxa showed greater variation, including two tetraploids.
Observation Polyploidy was first reported in P. pulchra, with genome size 26.17 pg.
Method / resource Genome size could not distinguish the two subsections.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Morphological, environmental and biogeographic approaches show no significant differences between taxa of the Natrix and Viscosae subsections.

Taxon: OnonisOnonist0
Outcome: significant differences between taxa of both subsectionse0

Verbatim

t0
“genus Ononis L.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–54

e0
“Morphological, environmental and biogeographic approaches do not show significant differences between taxa of both subsections”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–240

Title

Morpho-environmental strategies in the genus Ononis L. (subsections Natrix and Viscosae) in Western Mediterranean

J. Rocha; R. Ramírez; M. Díaz; et al. Figshare 2016. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.4042941.v1

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Central subsections cut from treated nonabraded coleoptiles grew normally.

Taxon: cornZea mays subsp. mayse1
Outcome: responded normally in growth experimentse0
Direction: normallye0

Verbatim

e0
“Subsections recut from the central region of antiserum‐treated, nonabraded coleoptiles responded normally in growth experiments”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–755

e1
“corn ( Zea mays L. hybrid B73 X Mo17)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–84

Title

Wall‐protein antibodies as inhibitors of growth and of autolytic reactions of isolated cell wall

Donald J. Huber; Donald J. Nevins Physiologia Plantarum 1981. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1981.tb02746.x

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Wall-protein antiserum inhibited corn coleoptile segment growth by 35% against normal serum.
Observation Nonabraded coleoptiles showed 8 to 10% growth inhibition.
Intervention effect Antiserum precontacted with isolated wall inhibited growth less effectively.
Intervention effect Antiserum reduced isolated-wall autolysis from 8.6 to 2.6 μg per mg per hour, a 70% reduction.
Intervention effect After 24 h, antiserum-treated wall yielded 50% less than control wall.
Intervention effect Antiserum did not change the molecular-weight distribution of released products.
Intervention effect Antiserum did not significantly impair glucanase catalytic activity.
Intervention effect Adding wall-protein preparation enhanced autolytic potential by 132%.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No other ovary or ovule features could separate Rhododendron species into clearly distinguishable subgeneric taxa.

Taxon: RhododendronRhododendrone0
Outcome: arrange groups of species in clearly distinguishable subgeneric taxae2
Qualifier: it has not been possible to discern other featurese2

Verbatim

e0
“compared among, 131 species chosen to represent all the subgenera, sections and most of the subsections of Rhododendron”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–216

e2
“it has not been possible to discern other features, singly or in clusters, which could serve to arrange groups of species in clearly distinguishable subgeneric taxa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1190

Title

THE OVARY, OVULE AND MEGAGAMETOPHYTE IN RHODODENDRON

Barbara F Palser Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 1985. doi:10.24823/nrbge.1985.3410

Other claims from this paper (11)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“subsections”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics