Search claims · PlantClaims

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Assay standard deviations were low at both ethanol concentrations.

Taxon: AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome: Assay standard deviationse0
Direction: lowe0
Comparator: both ethanol concentrationse0

Verbatim

t0
“Alfalfa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–112

e0
“Assay standard deviations were low for both ethanol concentrations.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–951

Title

Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy Prediction and Heritability of Neutral Detergent‐Soluble Fiber in Alfalfa

C.E.L. Fonseca; J.L. Hansen; E.M. Thomas; et al. Crop Science 1999. doi:10.2135/cropsci1999.3951265x

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observation NDSF mean was 213.1 ± 7.21 g kg −1 after 90% ethanol extraction.
Observation NDSF mean was 179.5 ± 5.89 g kg −1 after 80% ethanol extraction.
Method / resource The 80% ethanol assay gave a better calibration equation.
Method / resource NIRS calibration standard errors ranged from 4.71 to 7.54 g kg −1.
Method / resource NIRS multiple determination coefficients ranged from 0.72 to 0.97.
Observation Most NDSF heritability estimates exceeded zero significantly and averaged 0.41.
Observation Expected selection gain averaged 10.3 g kg −1.
Recommendation Selecting parents with higher NDSF predicted by NIRS may improve alfalfa forage quality.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative standard deviations were below 10% in the shallot assay.

Outcome: relative standard deviationse0
Direction: less thane0
Value: 10%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“relative standard deviations are less than 10%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–343

Title

Determination of Pesticides in Shallot by Gas Chromatography Ion Trap Mass Spectometry

Wenjing Liu 2011

Other claims from this paper (2)

Method / resource The assay had a linear range of 0.05—5 mg/kg for eight pesticide residues in shallot.
Method / resource Average pesticide recovery exceeded 80% in the shallot assay.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aflatoxin assay relative standard deviations were below 8.2%.

Taxon: PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Outcome: relative standard deviationse0
Direction: less thane0
Value: 8.2%e0

Verbatim

t0
“Aflatoxin Contents in Peanuts”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–78

e0
“the relative standard deviations were less than 8.2%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–548

Title

Applied Technology in Using HPLC for Determining Aflatoxin Contents in Peanuts

Yong Gang Shi; Wei Zhong; Hao Wen; et al. Advanced materials research 2014. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1022.76

Other claims from this paper (6)

Method / resource HPLC determination of aflatoxins in peanuts took 14 minutes.
Method / resource Aflatoxin B1 detection limit was 0.04μg/kg.
Method / resource Aflatoxin B2 detection limit was 0.01μg/kg.
Method / resource Aflatoxin G1 detection limit was 0.20μg/kg.
Method / resource Aflatoxin G2 detection limit was 0.02μg/kg.
Method / resource Aflatoxin assay recoveries ranged from 81.0% to 115.0%.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The assay had relative standard deviations below 8.0%.

Taxon: cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatat0
Outcome: relative standard deviationse0
Value: < 8.0%e0

Verbatim

e0
“relative standard deviations < 8.0%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–445

t0
“cabbage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–87

Title

Residue levels of emamectin benzoate, imidacloprid and its major metabolites in cabbage from 12 regions in China and dietary risk assessment

Xia Zhao; Chao Dong; Jiye Hu Biomedical Chromatography 2023. doi:10.1002/bmc.5617

Other claims from this paper (5)

Method / resource The assay recovered seven compounds from cabbage at 80–102%.
Method / resource The quantification limit for each compound was 0.01 mg kg −1.
Observation Cabbage EB residues were below 0.01 mg kg −1 after the recommended interval and below Chinese limits.
Observation Cabbage IMI residues were below 0.016 mg kg −1 and below Chinese limits.
Observation Combined IMI and metabolite residues were below 0.068 mg kg −1 and below Chinese limits.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The residue assay had relative standard deviations of 2.1–9.5%.

Outcome: relative standard deviationse0
Value: 2.1–9.5%e0

Verbatim

e0
“the relative standard deviations (RSDs) were 2.1–9.5%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–487

Title

Determination, residue analysis and risk assessment of thiacloprid and spirotetramat in cowpeas under field conditions

Kailong Li; Wuying Chen; Wei Xiang; et al. Scientific Reports 2022. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-07119-1

Other claims from this paper (11)

Method / resource The residue assay recovered 81.3–95.1% of analytes.
Observation Thiacloprid degraded in cowpeas with a half-life of 1.14–1.54 days.
Observation Spirotetramat degraded in cowpeas with a half-life of 1.25–2.79 days.
Observation Terminal thiacloprid residues were 0.0255–0.4570 mg kg −1.
Observation Terminal spirotetramat residues were 0.0314–0.3070 mg kg −1.
Observation Chronic thiacloprid dietary risk quotients were 2.44–4.41%.
Observation Acute thiacloprid dietary risk quotients were 8.72–15.78%.
Observation Chronic spirotetramat dietary risk quotients were 1.03–1.87%.
Observation Acute spirotetramat dietary risk quotients were 0.18–0.32%.
Observation All dietary risk quotients were below 100%.
Observation Thiacloprid dietary risk through cowpeas was higher than spirotetramat risk.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Assay relative standard deviations were less than 3%.

Taxon: cannabisCannabise1
Outcome: RSDse0
Value: less than 3%e0

Verbatim

e0
“RSDs were less than 3%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1051

e1
“cannabis assay”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–49

Title

Method for the Analysis of Cannabinoids and Terpenes in Cannabis

Matthew W Giese; Mark A Lewis; Laura Giese; et al. Journal of AOAC International 2015. doi:10.5740/jaoacint.15-116

Other claims from this paper (3)

Method / resource Assay accuracy was within 5% at all levels.
Method / resource Interday and intraday repeatabilities across five cultivars yielded acceptable RSDs.
Method / resource The assay illustrated variability among cannabis from advanced indoor cultivation.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HPLC assay relative standard deviations ranged from 0.87% to 2.2%.

Taxon: Lithhocarpus polgstachrch Rehdt0
Outcome: relative standard deviationse0
Value: 0.87%～2.2%e0

Verbatim

e0
“The recoveries of the flavonoid are 97%～103%, and relative standard deviations are 0.87%～2.2%.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–637

t0
“Lithhocarpus polgstachrch Rehd”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–58

Title

Study on Flavonoid Assay in Lithhocarpus polgstachrch Rehd with Solid Phase Extraction and HPLC

Qiang Zhou Food Science 2006

Other claims from this paper (1)

Method / resource HPLC flavonoid assay recovery ranged from 97% to 103%.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative standard deviations of the chloropicrin assay were 1.9%~7.2%.

Taxon: Vegetables and Fruitst0
Outcome: relative standard deviations(RSD)e0
Value: 1.9%~7.2%e0

Verbatim

e0
“with relative standard deviations(RSD) of 1.9%~7.2%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–476

t0
“Vegetables and Fruits”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–69

Title

Determination of the Residue of Chloropicrin in Vegetables and Fruits by Gas Chromatography

Fengen Wang Nongyaoxue xuebao 2008

Other claims from this paper (9)

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Assay relative standard deviations ranged from 2% to 31 11%.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome: relative standard deviations (RSDs)e0
Value: 2% to 31 11%e0

Verbatim

e0
“the relative standard deviations (RSDs) ranged from 2% to 31 11%.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–827

t0
“soybean ( Glycine max (L.) Merr.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–87

Title

Determination of clomazone and acetochlor residues in soybean ( Glycine max (L.) Merr.)

Husham N. M. Hussan; Hairong He; Pengqiang Du; et al. International Journal of Environmental & Analytical Chemistry 2020. doi:10.1080/03067319.2019.1694668

Other claims from this paper (4)

Method / resource Assay recovery for the two herbicides was 86%-110%.
Method / resource The quantification limit was 0.01 mg/kg for each matrix and both herbicides.
Observation Clomazone residues at soybean harvest were below 0.01 mg/kg at recommended dosage.
Observation Acetochlor residues at soybean harvest were below 0.01 mg/kg at recommended dosage.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative standard deviations for the fruit assay were 1.3–7.9%.

Taxon: fruitst0
Outcome: relative standard deviations (RSDs)e0
Value: 1.3–7.9%e0

Verbatim

e0
“relative standard deviations (RSDs) were 1.3–7.9%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–920

t0
“fruits”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–25

Title

Penicillic acid in fruits: method development, validation by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry and survey in southern China

Wenbi Guan; Yingxin You; Jialing Li; et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2020. doi:10.1002/jsfa.10906

Other claims from this paper (4)

Method / resource The fruit assay recovered 72.9–102.2% of penicillic acid.
Observation Penicillic acid occurred in 14.9% of sampled fruits.
Observation Fruit penicillic acid contamination ranged from 0.200 to 0.596 μg kg −1.
Association Orange/mandarin, grape and kiwi were more favorable for fungal PA production than peach and apple.

“Assay standard deviations”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics