View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
General combining ability exceeded specific combining ability .
Outcomegeneral combining ability e0 Comparatorspecific combining ability e0 Verbatim
t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 e0 “general combining ability to occupy more than specific combining ability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–477 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Ability to compete was a more consistent measure of competitive ability than ability to withstand competition.
Outcomemore consistent measure of competitive ability e0 Verbatim
e0 “Ability to compete was a more consistent measure of competitive ability than AWC ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1563 t0 “barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–24 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
General combining ability variance was higher than specific combining ability variance.
Outcomegeneral combining ability variance e0 Comparatorspecific combining ability variance e0 Verbatim
e0 “the general combining ability variance were higher than the specific combining ability variance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–297 t0 “Mungbean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–29 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Ability to withstand competition was significantly correlated with ability to compete.
OutcomeAbility to withstand competition e0 Comparatorability to compete e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Ability to withstand competition was significantly correlated with ability to compete ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1369 t0 “barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–24 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
General combining ability variances exceeded specific combining ability variances.
TaxonIndian cauliflower t0 Outcomegeneral combining ability variances e0 Comparatorspecific combining ability variances e0 Verbatim
e0 “the magnitudes of general combining ability variances were higher than that of specific combining ability variances ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–637 t0 “Indian cauliflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–45 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Specific combining ability variance exceeded general combining ability variance.
Outcomespecific combining ability variance e0 Comparatorgeneral combining ability variances e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “higher specific combining ability variance than their respective general combining ability variances ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–295 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Specific combining ability components exceeded general combining ability components.
Outcomespecific combination ability components e0 Comparatorgeneral combination ability components e0 Verbatim
e0 “The specific combination ability components were larger than the general combination ability components ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1062 t0 “maize ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 97–102 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Low ratooning ability was dominant over high ratooning ability .
Outcomeratooning ability e1 Qualifierlow ratooning ability was dominant over high ratooning ability e1 Verbatim
e0 “Five japonica rice varieties were evaluated for ratooning ability and it's relationship with TNC content in rice stem base ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–122 e1 “The low ratooning ability was dominant over high ratooning ability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–825 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Xuhui 201 has good combining ability and strong restoring ability .
Outcomecombining ability and strong restoring ability e0 Verbatim
e0 “good combining ability and strong restoring ability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–523 t0 “Xuhui 201 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 e1 “japonica rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–94 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
High specific combining ability was associated with high combining ability of either parent.
OutcomeHigh specific combining ability e1 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “Pennisetum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–60 e1 “High specific combining ability was associated with high combining ability of either parent ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–483 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.