View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The path model had high adjusted R2 .
Outcomeadjusted R2 value e0 Verbatim
e0 “high adjusted R2 value (0.89) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1501 t0 “sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–57 Other claims from this paper (11) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Gradient boosting achieved an 89.95% adjusted R2 score in crop yield prediction.
Outcomeadjusted R2 score e0 Qualifiergradient boosting e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “89.95% of adjusted R2 score for gradient boosting ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1312 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The double log production function had adjusted R2 of 61%.
Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “strawberry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–46 e0 “The double log function showed the best fit with adjusted R2 of 61%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–808 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The fit of the browse-crown area relationship was better for photograph-based crown area (PCA, r2 adjusted = 0.75) than for field crown area (CA, r2 adjusted = 0.73) in Balanites .
Outcomethe fit of the relationship e2 Valuer2 adjusted = 0.75 e2 Qualifierr2 adjusted = 0.73 e2 Verbatim
t0 “Acacia dudgeoni and Balanites aegyptiaca ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–119 e2 “the fit of the relationship was better for PCA ( r2 adjusted = 0.75) compared to CA ( r2 adjusted = 0.73) for Balanites ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1012 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
MARS adjusted R² was 0.989.
TaxonSorghum-Sudangrass hybrid e1 Verbatim
e0 “highest R² value (0.993) and adjusted R² value (0.989) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1306 e1 “the Sorghum-Sudangrass hybrid were used ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–286 Other claims from this paper (16) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The Gompertz model had adjusted R2 of 0.96.
Verbatim
e0 “The adjusted R2 value of 0.96 is close to 1. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–825 t0 “Soybean plants have limited growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–34 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The developed forecast model had high adjusted R2 .
Verbatim
e0 “high value of adjusted R2 in the developed forecast model ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1014 t0 “Bengal Gram ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–34 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Agromet models had adjusted R2 values from 0.38 to 0.78.
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Agromet-models ( adjusted R2 = 0.38 to 0.78) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1487 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The nonirrigated model had R2 of 0.4983 and adjusted R2 of 0.4682.
Qualifieradjusted R2 = 0.4682 e0 Verbatim
e0 “without irrigation R = 0.7059; R2 = 0.4983; adjusted R2 = 0.4682 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1093 e1 “growing lentils for grain ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–315 Other claims from this paper (14) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The irrigated model had R2 of 0.3759 and adjusted R2 of 0.3385.
Qualifieradjusted R2 = 0.3385 e0 Verbatim
e0 “with irrigation R = 0,6131; R2 = 0.3759; adjusted R2 = 0.3385 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1238 e1 “growing lentils for grain ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–315 Other claims from this paper (14) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.