Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“aggregate-AMBC”

9 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

2020

Refine

More filters

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling increased aggregate microbial biomass carbon by 16%.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: SSe0
Outcome: aggregate-AMBCe0
Direction: increasede0
Value: +16%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“SS increased the contents of macro-aggregates (+5%), aggregate-AOC (+14.7%), and aggregate-AMBC (+16%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–945

t0
“maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17

Title

Increase in maize yield and soil aggregate-associated carbon in North China due to long-term conservation tillage

Ying Shen; Tingting Zhang; Jichao Cui; et al. Experimental Agriculture 2021. doi:10.1017/s001447972100020x

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect No tillage increased macro-aggregate content by 4.8% versus conventional tillage.
Intervention effect No tillage increased aggregate-associated organic carbon by 8.3%.
Intervention effect No tillage increased aggregate-associated microbial biomass carbon by 18.3%.
Intervention effect No tillage decreased maize yield by 11.5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling increased macro-aggregate content by 5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling increased aggregate organic carbon by 14.7%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling yield increase of 0.22% was not significant.
Intervention effect Subsoiling had the highest economic benefit of four tillage measures.
Intervention effect Rotary tillage had no significant advantage for the soil variables.
Intervention effect Rotary tillage reduced maize yield by 16.1% versus conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend subsoiling for soil aggregates, carbon, yield and economic benefit in the North China Plain.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage increased aggregate-associated microbial biomass carbon by 18.3%.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Treatment: NTe0
Outcome: aggregate-AMBCe0
Direction: increasede0
Value: +18.3%e0
Comparator: CTe0

Verbatim

e0
“Compared to CT, NT increased the content of macro-aggregates (+4.8%), aggregate-AOC (+8.3%), and aggregate-AMBC (+18.3%), but decreased maize yield (−11.5%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–841

Title

Increase in maize yield and soil aggregate-associated carbon in North China due to long-term conservation tillage

Ying Shen; Tingting Zhang; Jichao Cui; et al. Experimental Agriculture 2021. doi:10.1017/s001447972100020x

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect No tillage increased macro-aggregate content by 4.8% versus conventional tillage.
Intervention effect No tillage increased aggregate-associated organic carbon by 8.3%.
Intervention effect No tillage decreased maize yield by 11.5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling increased macro-aggregate content by 5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling increased aggregate organic carbon by 14.7%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling increased aggregate microbial biomass carbon by 16%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling yield increase of 0.22% was not significant.
Intervention effect Subsoiling had the highest economic benefit of four tillage measures.
Intervention effect Rotary tillage had no significant advantage for the soil variables.
Intervention effect Rotary tillage reduced maize yield by 16.1% versus conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend subsoiling for soil aggregates, carbon, yield and economic benefit in the North China Plain.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling increased aggregate organic carbon by 14.7%.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: SSe0
Outcome: aggregate-AOCe0
Direction: increasede0
Value: +14.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“SS increased the contents of macro-aggregates (+5%), aggregate-AOC (+14.7%), and aggregate-AMBC (+16%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–945

t0
“maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17

Title

Increase in maize yield and soil aggregate-associated carbon in North China due to long-term conservation tillage

Ying Shen; Tingting Zhang; Jichao Cui; et al. Experimental Agriculture 2021. doi:10.1017/s001447972100020x

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect No tillage increased macro-aggregate content by 4.8% versus conventional tillage.
Intervention effect No tillage increased aggregate-associated organic carbon by 8.3%.
Intervention effect No tillage increased aggregate-associated microbial biomass carbon by 18.3%.
Intervention effect No tillage decreased maize yield by 11.5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling increased macro-aggregate content by 5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling increased aggregate microbial biomass carbon by 16%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling yield increase of 0.22% was not significant.
Intervention effect Subsoiling had the highest economic benefit of four tillage measures.
Intervention effect Rotary tillage had no significant advantage for the soil variables.
Intervention effect Rotary tillage reduced maize yield by 16.1% versus conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend subsoiling for soil aggregates, carbon, yield and economic benefit in the North China Plain.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage increased aggregate-associated organic carbon by 8.3%.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Treatment: NTe0
Outcome: aggregate-AOCe0
Direction: increasede0
Value: +8.3%e0
Comparator: CTe0

Verbatim

e0
“Compared to CT, NT increased the content of macro-aggregates (+4.8%), aggregate-AOC (+8.3%), and aggregate-AMBC (+18.3%), but decreased maize yield (−11.5%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–841

Title

Increase in maize yield and soil aggregate-associated carbon in North China due to long-term conservation tillage

Ying Shen; Tingting Zhang; Jichao Cui; et al. Experimental Agriculture 2021. doi:10.1017/s001447972100020x

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect No tillage increased macro-aggregate content by 4.8% versus conventional tillage.
Intervention effect No tillage increased aggregate-associated microbial biomass carbon by 18.3%.
Intervention effect No tillage decreased maize yield by 11.5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling increased macro-aggregate content by 5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling increased aggregate organic carbon by 14.7%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling increased aggregate microbial biomass carbon by 16%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling yield increase of 0.22% was not significant.
Intervention effect Subsoiling had the highest economic benefit of four tillage measures.
Intervention effect Rotary tillage had no significant advantage for the soil variables.
Intervention effect Rotary tillage reduced maize yield by 16.1% versus conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend subsoiling for soil aggregates, carbon, yield and economic benefit in the North China Plain.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling increased macro-aggregate content by 5%.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: SSe0
Outcome: contents of macro-aggregatese0
Direction: increasede0
Value: +5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“SS increased the contents of macro-aggregates (+5%), aggregate-AOC (+14.7%), and aggregate-AMBC (+16%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–945

t0
“maize yield and soil aggregate-associated carbon in North China due to long-term conservation tillage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–113

Title

Increase in maize yield and soil aggregate-associated carbon in North China due to long-term conservation tillage

Ying Shen; Tingting Zhang; Jichao Cui; et al. Experimental Agriculture 2021. doi:10.1017/s001447972100020x

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect No tillage increased macro-aggregate content by 4.8% versus conventional tillage.
Intervention effect No tillage increased aggregate-associated organic carbon by 8.3%.
Intervention effect No tillage increased aggregate-associated microbial biomass carbon by 18.3%.
Intervention effect No tillage decreased maize yield by 11.5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling increased aggregate organic carbon by 14.7%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling increased aggregate microbial biomass carbon by 16%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling yield increase of 0.22% was not significant.
Intervention effect Subsoiling had the highest economic benefit of four tillage measures.
Intervention effect Rotary tillage had no significant advantage for the soil variables.
Intervention effect Rotary tillage reduced maize yield by 16.1% versus conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend subsoiling for soil aggregates, carbon, yield and economic benefit in the North China Plain.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage increased macro-aggregate content by 4.8% versus conventional tillage.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Treatment: NTe0
Outcome: content of macro-aggregatese0
Direction: increasede0
Value: +4.8%e0
Comparator: CTe0

Verbatim

e0
“Compared to CT, NT increased the content of macro-aggregates (+4.8%), aggregate-AOC (+8.3%), and aggregate-AMBC (+18.3%), but decreased maize yield (−11.5%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–841

Title

Increase in maize yield and soil aggregate-associated carbon in North China due to long-term conservation tillage

Ying Shen; Tingting Zhang; Jichao Cui; et al. Experimental Agriculture 2021. doi:10.1017/s001447972100020x

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect No tillage increased aggregate-associated organic carbon by 8.3%.
Intervention effect No tillage increased aggregate-associated microbial biomass carbon by 18.3%.
Intervention effect No tillage decreased maize yield by 11.5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling increased macro-aggregate content by 5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling increased aggregate organic carbon by 14.7%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling increased aggregate microbial biomass carbon by 16%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling yield increase of 0.22% was not significant.
Intervention effect Subsoiling had the highest economic benefit of four tillage measures.
Intervention effect Rotary tillage had no significant advantage for the soil variables.
Intervention effect Rotary tillage reduced maize yield by 16.1% versus conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend subsoiling for soil aggregates, carbon, yield and economic benefit in the North China Plain.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage decreased maize yield by 11.5%.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Treatment: NTe0
Outcome: maize yielde0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: −11.5%e0
Comparator: CTe0

Verbatim

e0
“Compared to CT, NT increased the content of macro-aggregates (+4.8%), aggregate-AOC (+8.3%), and aggregate-AMBC (+18.3%), but decreased maize yield (−11.5%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–841

Title

Increase in maize yield and soil aggregate-associated carbon in North China due to long-term conservation tillage

Ying Shen; Tingting Zhang; Jichao Cui; et al. Experimental Agriculture 2021. doi:10.1017/s001447972100020x

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect No tillage increased macro-aggregate content by 4.8% versus conventional tillage.
Intervention effect No tillage increased aggregate-associated organic carbon by 8.3%.
Intervention effect No tillage increased aggregate-associated microbial biomass carbon by 18.3%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling increased macro-aggregate content by 5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling increased aggregate organic carbon by 14.7%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling increased aggregate microbial biomass carbon by 16%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling yield increase of 0.22% was not significant.
Intervention effect Subsoiling had the highest economic benefit of four tillage measures.
Intervention effect Rotary tillage had no significant advantage for the soil variables.
Intervention effect Rotary tillage reduced maize yield by 16.1% versus conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend subsoiling for soil aggregates, carbon, yield and economic benefit in the North China Plain.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling yield increase of 0.22% was not significant.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: SSe0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: increasee0
Value: +0.22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“SS increased the contents of macro-aggregates (+5%), aggregate-AOC (+14.7%), and aggregate-AMBC (+16%); although the yield increase was not significant (+0.22%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–1003

t0
“maize yield and soil aggregate-associated carbon in North China due to long-term conservation tillage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–113

Title

Increase in maize yield and soil aggregate-associated carbon in North China due to long-term conservation tillage

Ying Shen; Tingting Zhang; Jichao Cui; et al. Experimental Agriculture 2021. doi:10.1017/s001447972100020x

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect No tillage increased macro-aggregate content by 4.8% versus conventional tillage.
Intervention effect No tillage increased aggregate-associated organic carbon by 8.3%.
Intervention effect No tillage increased aggregate-associated microbial biomass carbon by 18.3%.
Intervention effect No tillage decreased maize yield by 11.5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling increased macro-aggregate content by 5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling increased aggregate organic carbon by 14.7%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling increased aggregate microbial biomass carbon by 16%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling had the highest economic benefit of four tillage measures.
Intervention effect Rotary tillage had no significant advantage for the soil variables.
Intervention effect Rotary tillage reduced maize yield by 16.1% versus conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend subsoiling for soil aggregates, carbon, yield and economic benefit in the North China Plain.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling had the highest economic benefit of four tillage measures.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: SSe0
Outcome: economic benefite0
Direction: higheste0
Comparator: four tillage measurese0

Verbatim

e0
“SS increased the contents of macro-aggregates (+5%), aggregate-AOC (+14.7%), and aggregate-AMBC (+16%); although the yield increase was not significant (+0.22%), it had the highest economic benefit among the four tillage measures”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–1072

t0
“maize yield and soil aggregate-associated carbon in North China due to long-term conservation tillage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–113

Title

Increase in maize yield and soil aggregate-associated carbon in North China due to long-term conservation tillage

Ying Shen; Tingting Zhang; Jichao Cui; et al. Experimental Agriculture 2021. doi:10.1017/s001447972100020x

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect No tillage increased macro-aggregate content by 4.8% versus conventional tillage.
Intervention effect No tillage increased aggregate-associated organic carbon by 8.3%.
Intervention effect No tillage increased aggregate-associated microbial biomass carbon by 18.3%.
Intervention effect No tillage decreased maize yield by 11.5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling increased macro-aggregate content by 5%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling increased aggregate organic carbon by 14.7%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling increased aggregate microbial biomass carbon by 16%.
Intervention effect Subsoiling yield increase of 0.22% was not significant.
Intervention effect Rotary tillage had no significant advantage for the soil variables.
Intervention effect Rotary tillage reduced maize yield by 16.1% versus conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend subsoiling for soil aggregates, carbon, yield and economic benefit in the North China Plain.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“aggregate-AMBC”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics