Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“cleaning efficiency”

339 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 127 non-evaluative

Over time

1980 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

Refine

More filters

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cleaning efficiency was 82%.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome: cleaning efficiencye0
Value: 82%e0

Verbatim

t0
“wheat”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 77–82

e0
“cleaning efficiency of 82%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–942

Title

Adaptive Performance Evaluation of IAR-Sorghum Thresher for Two Varieties of Wheat

Akintayo Afolabi; Kolawole I. Oguntade; Aisha Abdulkadir Basrah Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2021. doi:10.37077/25200860.2021.34.sp1.9

Other claims from this paper (3)

Method / resource Threshing efficiency was 95%.
Method / resource Scatter loss was a high 10%.
Method / resource Output capacity was an unsatisfactory 9 kg hr-1.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean cleaning efficiency was 97.77%.

Outcome: cleaning efficiencye0
Value: 97.77%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“cleaning efficiency of 97.77% and 97.61%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–937

Title

Manufacture and Development of a Small Threshing Machine

W. El-Fakhrany; M. A. Aboegela Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2021. doi:10.21608/jssae.2021.157375

Other claims from this paper (11)

Method / resource At 450 rpm and 500 kg/h, soybean criterion cost was lowest at 948 L.E/Mg.
Method / resource At the optimum settings, dry bean criterion cost was lowest at 908.4 L.E/Mg.
Method / resource Soybean threshing efficiency was 98.03%.
Method / resource Dry bean threshing efficiency was 97.79%.
Method / resource Soybean seed damage was 2.72%.
Method / resource Dry bean seed damage was 2.55%.
Method / resource Dry bean cleaning efficiency was 97.61%.
Method / resource Soybean specific consumed energy was 37.93 kWh/Mg.
Method / resource Dry bean specific consumed energy was 35.41 kWh/Mg.
Method / resource Soybean private cost was 526.5 L.E/Mg.
Method / resource Dry bean private cost was 480 L.E/Mg.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry bean cleaning efficiency was 97.61%.

Outcome: cleaning efficiencye0
Value: 97.61%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“cleaning efficiency of 97.77% and 97.61%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–937

Title

Manufacture and Development of a Small Threshing Machine

W. El-Fakhrany; M. A. Aboegela Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2021. doi:10.21608/jssae.2021.157375

Other claims from this paper (11)

Method / resource At 450 rpm and 500 kg/h, soybean criterion cost was lowest at 948 L.E/Mg.
Method / resource At the optimum settings, dry bean criterion cost was lowest at 908.4 L.E/Mg.
Method / resource Soybean threshing efficiency was 98.03%.
Method / resource Dry bean threshing efficiency was 97.79%.
Method / resource Soybean seed damage was 2.72%.
Method / resource Dry bean seed damage was 2.55%.
Method / resource Soybean cleaning efficiency was 97.77%.
Method / resource Soybean specific consumed energy was 37.93 kWh/Mg.
Method / resource Dry bean specific consumed energy was 35.41 kWh/Mg.
Method / resource Soybean private cost was 526.5 L.E/Mg.
Method / resource Dry bean private cost was 480 L.E/Mg.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined paddy threshers had 90.7% cleaning efficiency.

Taxon: paddyt0
Outcome: cleaning efficiencye0
Value: 90.7%e0

Verbatim

e0
“90.7% cleaning efficiency”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1240

t0
“Paddy”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80

Title

Performance Evaluation of Four Wheel Tractor Driven High Capacity Combined Paddy Thresher

GVTV Weerasooriya; MHMA Bandara; M Rambanda Tropical Agricultural Research 2011. doi:10.4038/tar.v22i3.3700

Other claims from this paper (10)

Method / resource Combined paddy threshers produced 1.8% damaged grain.
Method / resource Combined paddy threshers produced 0.2% blown grains.
Method / resource Combined paddy threshers had 1.6% grain losses.
Method / resource Combined paddy threshers had 96.7% threshing recovery.
Method / resource Combined paddy threshers had 98.8% threshing efficiency.
Method / resource Combined paddy threshers had 1178 kg/h corrected output capacity.
Method / resource Actual threshing cost was Rs. 2744 per metric ton of output.
Association Thresher performance, economics and emissions varied with machine make, grain type and operating conditions.
Association Grain moisture was the dominant factor affecting thresher performance.
Method / resource Supervised classification?

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cleaning efficiency was 85.72%.

Taxon: RICEOryza sativat0
Outcome: cleaning efficiencye0
Value: 85.72%e0

Verbatim

e0
“cleaning efficiency was 85.72%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1291

t0
“RICE THRESHING MACHINE”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–49

Title

DESIGN AND PRODUCTION OF A RICE THRESHING MACHINE TO ENHANCE RICE HARVESTING IN NIGERIA

Aniekan Offiong; A.P. Ihom; Enemouh Nnamdi Martins Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2026. doi:10.5281/zenodo.20665157

Other claims from this paper (15)

Method / resource A rice threshing machine was produced for postharvest rice threshing.
Observation Production cost per thresher was ₦450,000 ($331.6).
Observation Performance evaluation cost was ₦100,000 ($73.69).
Method / resource Stripping efficiency was 3.23%.
Method / resource Threshing efficiency was 80.72%.
Method / resource Separation efficiency was 81.11%.
Method / resource Drum losses were 19.28%.
Method / resource Cleaning losses were 4.42%.
Method / resource Separation losses were 6.16%.
Association Grain weight declined as efficiency rose.
Method / resource Models were developed for cleaning and separation efficiencies and cleaning, separation and total grain losses.
Association Threshing time significantly affected throughput capacity.
Method / resource The throughput-capacity model was highly significant and explained 99.92% of variance.
Association Threshing time was significant in the throughput model.
Association Moisture content was not significant in the throughput model.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton cleaning rate had no effect on seed cotton cleaning system efficiency.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutume5
Treatment: seed cotton cleaning ratee5
Outcome: Seed cotton cleaning system efficiencye5
Direction: had no effecte5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e5
“Seed cotton cleaning system efficiency was greater for stripper harvested cotton and when two stick machines were used but seed cotton cleaning rate had no effect”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1267

Title

Influence of Seed Cotton Extractor Cleaners and Cleaning Rate on Gin Turnout and Fiber Quality

John D Wanjura; William B Faulkner; Greg A Holt; et al. 2011 Louisville, Kentucky, August 7 - August 10, 2011 2011. doi:10.13031/2013.39000

Other claims from this paper (18)

Intervention effect Picker harvested cotton contained less foreign matter than stripper harvested cotton.
Intervention effect Two stick machines removed more foreign material from seed cotton than one stick machine.
Intervention effect More foreign material was removed by the stick machines at slower seed cotton cleaning rates.
Intervention effect Total stick machine seed cotton loss was higher for systems using two stick machines.
Intervention effect Total stick machine seed cotton loss was unaffected by harvest method or seed cotton cleaning rate.
Intervention effect Seed cotton cleaning system efficiency was greater for stripper harvested cotton.
Intervention effect Seed cotton cleaning system efficiency was greater when two stick machines were used.
Intervention effect Picker harvested cotton exhibited improved HVI and AFIS fiber quality parameters compared with stripper harvested cotton.
Intervention effect Two stick machines improved fiber reflectance and yellowness properties of cotton fiber.
Intervention effect Two stick machines reduced lint foreign matter content.
Intervention effect Seed cotton cleaning rate had a minimal effect on fiber quality.
Intervention effect Total bale values were higher for picker harvested cotton.
Intervention effect Total bale values were not influenced by the number of stick machines or seed cotton cleaning rate.
Intervention effect Bale values for picker cotton decreased between one and two stages of lint cleaning.
Intervention effect Stripper harvested bale values increased between one and two stages of lint cleaning.
Intervention effect Yarn imperfections were reduced for ring spun yarn from picker harvested cotton processed through one stick machine at the high cleaning rate.
Recommendation The authors support the current recommendation of one stick machine for picker harvested cotton and two stick machines for stripper harvested cotton.
Intervention effect Harvest method affected differences in lint turnout.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest cleaning efficiency was 93.06%.

Taxon: cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
Outcome: cleaning efficiencye0
Direction: higheste0
Value: 93.06%e0

Verbatim

e0
“A highest cleaning efficiency and grain damage of 93.06% and 4.90% respectively were observed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1032

t0
“cowpea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–21

Title

Development of cowpea thresher

S. N. Onuoha; M. A. Enaboifo; R. Ibrahim Nigerian Journal of Technology 2022. doi:10.4314/njt.v41i2.21

Other claims from this paper (10)

Method / resource Highest threshing efficiency was 98% at 11.05% moisture, 900 rpm, and 6 kg/hr feed.
Method / resource Maximum throughput was 46.18 kg/hr at 10 kg/hr feed, 11.05% moisture, and 900 rpm.
Method / resource Highest grain damage was 4.90%.
Association Threshing and cleaning efficiencies increased with cylinder speed.
Association Throughput capacity increased with cylinder speed.
Association Higher cylinder speed was associated with decreased feed rate.
Association Higher cylinder speed was associated with decreased moisture content.
Association Higher cowpea moisture tended to reduce mechanical seed damage.
Recommendation The authors recommended 11.05% moisture and 900 rpm for optimum threshing performance.
Method / resource Machine performance was judged satisfactory.

Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cleaning efficiency and root injury level have a fine balance.

Taxon: sugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
Treatment: cleaning efficiencye0
Outcome: injury levele0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“there exists a fine balance between cleaning efficiency and injury level”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–738

t0
“harvesting, cleaning, and storage of sugarbeet”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–627

Title

Balance between reduction of soil tare and root injuries

Jens K. Steensen International sugar journal 2002

Other claims from this paper (2)

Intervention effect Hard cleaning and handling cause root injuries and loss during sugarbeet harvest.
Intervention effect Hard cleaning and handling increase respiration rate during storage.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean cleaning efficiency ranged from 90 to 63.28%.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome: cleaning efficiencye0
Value: 90 and 63.28%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0
“cleaning efficiency varied between 90 and 63.28% for soybean samples”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–813

Title

Effects of impurity on the efficiency of a legume threshing machine

O. B. Aluko; L. A. Sanni; T. O. Akingbade; et al. African Journal of Agricultural Research 2020. doi:10.5897/ajar2020.14895

Other claims from this paper (8)

Method / resource Soybean threshing efficiency ranged from 87 to 97%.
Method / resource Carpet surface produced an average minimal soybean seed damage of 0.78%.
Method / resource Cowpea threshing efficiency was 97.44%.
Method / resource Cowpea cleaning efficiency was 97.16%.
Method / resource Average cowpea loss was 2.60%.
Association Impurity level and feed rate affected cleaning efficiency.
Association Surface type affected threshing percentage and broken seeds.
Method / resource A 100 g batch on carpet was the best combination for cleaning, threshing, damage and losses.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rice thresher achieved 85.72% cleaning efficiency.

Taxon: RICEOryza sativat0
Outcome: cleaning efficiencye0
Value: 85.72%e0

Verbatim

e0
“cleaning efficiency was 85.72%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1291

t0
“RICE THRESHING MACHINE”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–49

Title

DESIGN AND PRODUCTION OF A RICE THRESHING MACHINE TO ENHANCE RICE HARVESTING IN NIGERIA

Aniekan Offiong; A.P. Ihom; Enemouh Nnamdi Martins Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2026. doi:10.5281/zenodo.20665156

Other claims from this paper (12)

Method / resource The rice thresher achieved 3.23% stripping efficiency.
Method / resource The rice thresher achieved 80.72% threshing efficiency.
Method / resource The rice thresher achieved 81.11% separation efficiency.
Observation Drum grain losses were 19.28%.
Observation Cleaning grain losses were 4.42%.
Observation Separation grain losses were 6.16%.
Association Grain weight decreased as efficiency increased.
Method / resource The study developed equations for cleaning and separation efficiency and losses and total grain loss.
Association Threshing time significantly affected throughput capacity.
Method / resource The throughput model was highly significant and explained 99.92% of variance.
Association Threshing time was significant for throughput capacity.
Association Moisture content was not significant for throughput capacity.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“cleaning efficiency”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics