View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: sorghum ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Neutral detergent fibre and lignin in sorghum silage tended to decrease with in creasing silage density .
Treatmentincreasing silage density e3 Outcomeneutral detergent fibre, lignin e3 Directiontended to decrease e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “chemical and microbiological characteristics of sorghum silage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–133 e3 “The contents of neutral detergent fibre, lignin, pH values, yeast and mould counts and the DM losses tended to decrease together with in creasing silage density ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 835–994 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
pH values, yeast and mould counts and DM losses in sorghum silage tended to decrease with in creasing silage density .
Treatmentincreasing silage density e3 OutcomepH values, yeast and mould counts and the DM losses e3 Directiontended to decrease e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “chemical and microbiological characteristics of sorghum silage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–133 e3 “The contents of neutral detergent fibre, lignin, pH values, yeast and mould counts and the DM losses tended to decrease together with in creasing silage density ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 835–994 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
More polishing decrease d sorghum porosity and true density .
TreatmentMore polishing e0 Outcomeporosity, and true density e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “More polishing resulted in a decrease in 1000 seed weight, hardness, volume, porosity, and true density of sorghum. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–998 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Greater planting density decrease d stem diameter by about 22%.
TreatmentIncreased planting density e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In creased planting density in duced a > 2-fold in crease in sorghum in ternode length and a ~ 22% decrease in stem diameter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–479 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Applying 112 kg N at high sorghum planting density did not decrease the number, height, or biomass of late-emerging Palmer amaranth.
Treatmentapplying 112 kg N e3 InteractorPalmer amaranth e2 weed OutcomePalmer amaranth’s number, height, and biomass e3 Directionno_change inferred e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e2 “Weedy sorghum was in fested with late-emerging Palmer amaranth only ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–665 e3 “applying 112 kg N ha −1 did not improve grain yield or decrease Palmer amaranth’s number, height, and biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–899 e0 “At the high sorghum planting density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–764 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing plant density slightly decrease d moisture content.
Outcomemoisture content e6 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e6 “Harvest moisture content was significantly higher with wider row spacings, while in creasing plant density resulted in a slight decrease in moisture content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1193 t0 “In fluence of seed rate and row spacing across on two different maturity groups of sorghum grain yield and quality characteristics ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–129 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Close planting led to lower stomatal density in sorghum leaves.
Treatmentclose planting e0 Outcomestomatal density e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “close planting in duced a significant decrease in light in tensity within populations, which further resulted in much lower stomatal density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–486 t0 “sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–84 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
At high sorghum planting density , applying 112 kg N ha-1 did not improve grain yield.
Treatmentapplying 112 kg N e3 Directiondid not improve e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e3 “applying 112 kg N ha −1 did not improve grain yield or decrease Palmer amaranth’s number, height, and biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–899 e0 “At the high sorghum planting density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–764 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Applying 112 kg N at high sorghum planting density in creased sorghum head number and height.
Treatmentapplying 112 kg N e3 Outcomesorghum head number and height e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e3 “applying 112 kg N ha −1 did not improve grain yield or decrease Palmer amaranth’s number, height, and biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–899 e4 “but in creased sorghum head number and height ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–945 e0 “At the high sorghum planting density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–764 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
More polishing decrease d sorghum 1000-seed weight, hardness and volume.
TreatmentMore polishing e0 Outcome1000 seed weight, hardness, volume e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “More polishing resulted in a decrease in 1000 seed weight, hardness, volume, porosity, and true density of sorghum. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–998 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.