View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: spring wheat ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Green manure crops gave the greatest soil density decrease , 7-8%.
Verbatim
e0 “The greatest decrease in the soil density (7-8%) was observed in the 0-10 cm layer after green-manure crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–983 t0 “spring wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 Other claims from this paper (12) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Marker density as low as 500 did not decrease prediction accuracy.
Outcomeprediction accuracy e0 Directionwithout decreasing e0 Verbatim
e0 “marker density could be as low as 500 without decreasing the prediction accuracy ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1098 t0 “spring wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 Other claims from this paper (4) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield decrease under conservation tillage was mostly attributed to a decrease d ear density .
Treatmentconservation tillage e1 Outcomeyield of spring wheat grain e1 Qualifiera decreased ear density e1 Verbatim
t0 “HEALTH OF SPRING WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–100 e1 “Decrease in the yield of spring wheat grain on plots with conservation tillage, to the highest degree resulted from a decrease d ear density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1055 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing wheat row spacing from 12 to 24 cm did not decrease wheat yield.
TreatmentIncreasing the row space of spring wheat from 12 to 24 cm e0 Directiondidn´t decrease e0 Qualifiermaintaining the same seeding density e0 Verbatim
e0 “In creasing the row space of spring wheat from 12 to 24 cm, but maintaining the same seeding density , didn´t decrease its yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing density from 500 to 800 grains per 1 m 2 reduced weed number by 22%.
Treatment800 grains per 1 m 2 e0 Verbatim
e0 “In creasing sowing density from 500 to 800 grains per 1 m 2 resulted in a decrease by 22% in the number of weeds and by 27% in their air-dry weight. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–966 t0 “SPRING WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing density from 500 to 800 grains per 1 m 2 reduced weed air-dry weight by 27%.
Treatment800 grains per 1 m 2 e0 Verbatim
e0 “In creasing sowing density from 500 to 800 grains per 1 m 2 resulted in a decrease by 22% in the number of weeds and by 27% in their air-dry weight. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–966 t0 “SPRING WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Conservation tillage lowered soil temperature and bulk density relative to conventional tillage.
Treatmentconservation tillage systems e1 Outcomesoil temperature and bulk density e0 Verbatim
e0 “decreasing the soil temperature and bulk density over CT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1898–1954 t0 “spring wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118 e1 “conservation tillage systems ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1400 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Flag leaf area, length and width in creased as plant density decrease d.
Treatmentdensity of standing plants per square meter of cropped area e0 Outcomearea of the flag leaf, as well as its length and width e0 Verbatim
e0 “the area of the flag leaf, as well as its length and width, in creased with a decrease in the density of standing plants per square meter of cropped area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1360 t0 “spring wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower seeding density in creased grain yield per plant.
Treatment15 plants per pot e0 Outcomeplant productivity e0 Value1.71 g of grain per plant e0 Verbatim
e0 “Decrease in the seeding rate (from 20 to 15 plants per pot) led to an in crease in plant productivity (1.71 g of grain per plant vs. 1.02 g) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1527 t0 “spring wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.