Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Conservation tillage improved soil organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus properties over conventional tillage.

A claim from Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage improved soil organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus properties over conventional tillage.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
conservation tillage systemse1
Outcome
organic carbon, light fraction organic carbon, carbon storagee0
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic carbon, light fraction organic carbon, carbon storage, microbial biomass carbon, total nitrogen, available nitrogen storage, microbial biomass nitrogen, total phosphorous, available phosphorous”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1567–1768
e1

“these conservation tillage systems notably improved the soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1437
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118

Title

Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems

Mahran Sadiq; Nasir Rahim; Majid Mahmood Tahir; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2024. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1356426

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-5bf8cd7b39c88aaaaa28038f5a494026306fd0f6e9490604d636cd8ccbda51d1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

tillage · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 50 positive, 6 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.