Paper · 2023 · Plants

Differentiation in Nitrogen Transformations and Crop Yield as Affected by Tillage Modes in a Fluvo-Aquic Soil

Fengmin Shen; Changwei Zhu; Guiying Jiang; et al.

10
claims
12
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Nitrogen is a vital element for soil fertility and crop productivity. The transformation of nitrogen is directly affected by tillage practices for the disturbing soil. The characteristics of different nitrogen forms under different tillage modes are still unclear. A 3-year cycle tillage experiment was carried out to assess the combination of rotary tillage (RT), deep tillage (DT), and shallow rotary tillage (SRT) on nitrogen transformation and distribution, wheat yield and nitrogen balance in fluvo-aquic soil from Huang-Huai-Hai Plain in China. The results showed the rotation tillage cycle with deep tillage in the first year increased the total nitrogen (TN), and the main nitrogen form content in 0–30 cm compared with continued rotary tillage (RT-RT-RT). Moreover, the nitrate (NO3−-N) and ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N) content were improved in 20–40 cm by deep tillage practice with the highest value as 39.88 mg kg−1 under DT-SRT-RT. The time, tillage, and depth significantly affected the different nitrogen forms, but there was no effect on dissolved organic carbon (DON) and soil microbial biomass nitrogen (SMBN) by the interaction of time and tillage. Moreover, compared with RT-RT-RT, the rotation tillage promoted the spike number and kernels per spike of wheat, further increasing the wheat yield and nitrogen partial productivity, and with a better effect under DT-SRT-RT. The NO3−-N and NH4+-N trended closer and positively correlated with wheat yield in 0–40 cm in 2019. The rotation tillage with deep tillage improved the different forms of nitrogen in 0–30 cm, wheat yield, and nitrogen partial productivity, and decreased the apparent nitrogen loss. It was suggested as the efficiency tillage practice to improve nitrogen use efficiency and crop yield in this area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation tillage beginning with deep tillage increased total nitrogen and main nitrogen form content at 0–30 cm relative to continued rotary tillage.

Treatment
rotation tillage cycle with deep tillage in the first yeare0
Outcome
total nitrogen (TN), and the main nitrogen form contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
0–30 cme0
Comparator
continued rotary tillage (RT-RT-RT)e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed the rotation tillage cycle with deep tillage in the first year increased the total nitrogen (TN), and the main nitrogen form content in 0–30 cm compared with continued rotary tillage (RT-RT-RT).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage improved nitrate content at 20–40 cm.

Treatment
deep tillage practicee0
Outcome
nitrate (NO3−-N)e0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
20–40 cme0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover, the nitrate (NO3−-N) and ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N) content were improved in 20–40 cm by deep tillage practice with the highest value as 39.88 mg kg−1 under DT-SRT-RT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–942 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage improved ammonium nitrogen content at 20–40 cm, with the reported highest value of 39.88 mg kg−1 under DT-SRT-RT.

Treatment
deep tillage practicee0
Outcome
ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N) contente0
Direction
improvede0
Value
39.88 mg kg−1e0
Qualifier
20–40 cme0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Schema note from the model: The abstract does not clearly assign the highest value to nitrate or ammonium.

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover, the nitrate (NO3−-N) and ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N) content were improved in 20–40 cm by deep tillage practice with the highest value as 39.88 mg kg−1 under DT-SRT-RT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–942 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Time, tillage and depth significantly affected nitrogen forms.

Treatment
tillagee0
Outcome
different nitrogen formse0
Qualifier
time, tillage, and depthe0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The time, tillage, and depth significantly affected the different nitrogen forms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1023 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Time-by-tillage interaction had no effect on DON or soil microbial biomass nitrogen.

Treatment
interaction of time and tillagee0
Outcome
dissolved organic carbon (DON) and soil microbial biomass nitrogen (SMBN)e0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“there was no effect on dissolved organic carbon (DON) and soil microbial biomass nitrogen (SMBN) by the interaction of time and tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation tillage increased wheat spike number and kernels per spike relative to RT-RT-RT.

Treatment
rotation tillagee0
Outcome
spike number and kernels per spikee0
Direction
promotede0
Qualifier
better effect under DT-SRT-RTe0
Comparator
RT-RT-RTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover, compared with RT-RT-RT, the rotation tillage promoted the spike number and kernels per spike of wheat, further increasing the wheat yield and nitrogen partial productivity, and with a better effect under DT-SRT-RT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation tillage increased wheat yield and nitrogen partial productivity, with better effects under DT-SRT-RT.

Treatment
rotation tillagee0
Outcome
wheat yield and nitrogen partial productivitye0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
better effect under DT-SRT-RTe0
Comparator
RT-RT-RTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover, compared with RT-RT-RT, the rotation tillage promoted the spike number and kernels per spike of wheat, further increasing the wheat yield and nitrogen partial productivity, and with a better effect under DT-SRT-RT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1390 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate and ammonium nitrogen were positively correlated with wheat yield at 0–40 cm in 2019.

Compound
NO3−-N and NH4+-Ne0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Qualifier
0–40 cm in 2019e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The NO3−-N and NH4+-N trended closer and positively correlated with wheat yield in 0–40 cm in 2019.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep rotation tillage decreased apparent nitrogen loss.

Treatment
rotation tillage with deep tillagee0
Outcome
apparent nitrogen losse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The rotation tillage with deep tillage improved the different forms of nitrogen in 0–30 cm, wheat yield, and nitrogen partial productivity, and decreased the apparent nitrogen loss.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1491–1672 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend deep rotation tillage to improve nitrogen use efficiency and crop yield in the area.

Treatment
rotation tillage with deep tillagee1
Outcome
improve nitrogen use efficiency and crop yielde0
Setting
Huang-Huai-Hai Plain in Chinae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was suggested as the efficiency tillage practice to improve nitrogen use efficiency and crop yield in this area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1788 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rotation tillage with deep tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1491–1529 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat yield and nitrogen balance in fluvo-aquic soil from Huang-Huai-Hai Plain in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–549 · show in text ↑

rotation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 25 positive, 10 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

tillage · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 50 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

tillage · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 48 positive, 9 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

tillage · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 119 positive, 26 negative or no effect

118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

rotation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 253 positive, 92 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.