Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Weed Management Studies in Zero-Till Wheat in Rice-Wheat Cropping System

Ravi Gopal Singh; V. P. Singh; Govindra Singh; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted during winter seasons of 1995–96 and 1996–97 to evaluate efficacy of herbicides in zero-till wheat in rice-wheat cropping system. More weed emergence was recorded in conventional tillage (146 m−2) and reduced tillage (141 m−2) than in zero tillage system (103 m−2, at 30 days stage. P. minor was the dominant weed constituting 73, 57 and 58% of total weed density at 30 days stage in weedy conditions under conventional, reduced and zero tillage system, respectively. The maximum reduction in weed density and dry matter was obtained with application of diclofop methyl+isoproturon (0.84+0.75 kg ha−1) as tank mixture under zero tillage system. The highest average grain yield (3872 kg ha−1) was achieved under zero-till weed-free which was at par with conventional tillage weed-free situation. Tillage systems did not affect performance of isoproturon. Isoproturon alone or with 2, 4-D or diclofop methyl as tank mixture or diclofop methyl alone or tralkoxydim being at par with weed-free resulted in higher grain yield than the paraquat and weedy check under zero tillage system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed emergence was higher under conventional than zero tillage.

Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed emergencee0
Direction
Moree0
Value
146 m−2e0
Qualifier
103 m−2e0
Comparator
zero tillage systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More weed emergence was recorded in conventional tillage (146 m−2) and reduced tillage (141 m−2) than in zero tillage system (103 m−2, at 30 days stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–313 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zero-Till Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed emergence was higher under reduced than zero tillage.

Treatment
reduced tillagee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed emergencee0
Direction
Moree0
Value
141 m−2e0
Qualifier
103 m−2e0
Comparator
zero tillage systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More weed emergence was recorded in conventional tillage (146 m−2) and reduced tillage (141 m−2) than in zero tillage system (103 m−2, at 30 days stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–313 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zero-Till Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. minor constituted 73% of weed density under conventional tillage.

Interactor
P. minore0weed
Outcome
P. minor was the dominant weede0
Value
73e0
Setting
conventionale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. minor was the dominant weed constituting 73, 57 and 58% of total weed density at 30 days stage in weedy conditions under conventional, reduced and zero tillage system, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–498 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zero-Till Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. minor constituted 57% of weed density under reduced tillage.

Interactor
P. minore0weed
Outcome
total weed densitye0
Value
57e0
Setting
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. minor was the dominant weed constituting 73, 57 and 58% of total weed density at 30 days stage in weedy conditions under conventional, reduced and zero tillage system, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–498 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zero-Till Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. minor constituted 58% of weed density under zero tillage.

Interactor
P. minore0weed
Outcome
total weed densitye0
Value
58%e0
Setting
zero tillage systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. minor was the dominant weed constituting 73, 57 and 58% of total weed density at 30 days stage in weedy conditions under conventional, reduced and zero tillage system, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–498 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zero-Till Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diclofop methyl plus isoproturon gave maximum weed-density reduction under zero tillage.

Treatment
diclofop methyl+isoproturon (0.84+0.75 kg ha−1)e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
maximum reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum reduction in weed density and dry matter was obtained with application of diclofop methyl+isoproturon (0.84+0.75 kg ha−1) as tank mixture under zero tillage system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zero-Till Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diclofop methyl plus isoproturon gave maximum weed dry matter reduction under zero tillage.

Treatment
diclofop methyl+isoproturon (0.84+0.75 kg ha−1)e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
maximum reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum reduction in weed density and dry matter was obtained with application of diclofop methyl+isoproturon (0.84+0.75 kg ha−1) as tank mixture under zero tillage system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zero-Till Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero-till weed-free wheat had the highest average grain yield, at par with conventional weed-free.

Treatment
zero-till weed-freee0
Outcome
average grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3872 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
conventional tillage weed-freee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest average grain yield (3872 kg ha−1) was achieved under zero-till weed-free which was at par with conventional tillage weed-free situation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–825 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zero-Till Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage systems did not affect isoproturon performance.

Treatment
Tillage systemse0
Outcome
performance of isoproturone0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tillage systems did not affect performance of isoproturon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–884 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zero-Till Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon-based and other listed herbicide treatments gave higher wheat yield than paraquat and weedy check under zero tillage.

Treatment
Isoproturon alone or with 2, 4-D or diclofop methyl as tank mixture or diclofop methyl alone or tralkoxydime0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
paraquat and weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isoproturon alone or with 2, 4-D or diclofop methyl as tank mixture or diclofop methyl alone or tralkoxydim being at par with weed-free resulted in higher grain yield than the paraquat and weedy check under zero tillage system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zero-Till Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–42 · show in text ↑

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

diclofop · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

tralkoxydim · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 12 positive, 4 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

diclofop-methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 11 positive, 8 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

tillage · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

183 papers: 126 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 126 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

179 papers more in this group

See all 183 papers →

tillage · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 48 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.