View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: tomato ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sesame produced the greatest significant reduction in broomrape density .
InteractorBroomrape e0 parasite OutcomeBroomrape density e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Results showed that sesame had most significant decrease in Broomrape density . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–967 e1 “damage reduction to tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–246 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Nutsedge density decrease d rapidly at 570 L·ha –1 Propozone.
Outcomenutsedge density e0 Directionrapid decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Examined data in dicated that there was a rapid decrease in nutsedge density with 570 L·ha –1 . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–740 t0 “TOMATO NUTRIENT ABSORPTION AND NUTSEDGE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Pretransplant S-metolachlor did not reduce purple nutsedge density .
TreatmentS -metolachlor e0 Interactorpurple nutsedge e0 weed Outcomepurple nutsedge density e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Comparatornontreated control e0 Verbatim
e0 “Pre-T treatment of sulfentrazone or S -metolachlor alone were in effective and did not decrease purple nutsedge density compared with the nontreated control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–514 t0 “tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Fallow before tomato reduced P. penetrans soil population density by 37%.
OutcomeP. penetrans soil population densitye2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e2 “Weedy fallow preceding potato resulted in an average decline in P. penetrans soil population density of 38%, and a similar decrease (37%) was seen when fallow preceded tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1065 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Pretransplant sulfentrazone did not reduce purple nutsedge density relative to untreated plots.
Interactorpurple nutsedge e0 weed Outcomepurple nutsedge density e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Comparatornontreated control e0 Verbatim
e0 “Pre-T treatment of sulfentrazone or S -metolachlor alone were in effective and did not decrease purple nutsedge density compared with the nontreated control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–514 t0 “tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Resistant tomato reduced nematode density sharply at the end of the sequence.
Materialresistant tomato e0 Treatmentresistant tomato crop e0 Outcomenematode density e0 Directionsharp decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The resistant tomato crop showed a sharp decrease in the nematode density at the end of the crop sequence ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1062 e1 “Meloidogyne in cognita juveniles (J2) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–63 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
AMF presence in roots was associated with lower EPF root colonization density .
Second interactorAMF e0 symbiont OutcomeEPF root colonization densities e0 Verbatim
e0 “the presence of AMF in the roots was associated with a decrease of EPF root colonization densities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1661 e1 “Seedlings of tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–779 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Plant growth decrease d as nematode density in creased in treated and untreated plants.
Qualifierboth in bacteria-treated and untreated plants e0 Verbatim
e0 “A progressive decrease in plant growth was observed with an in crease in nematode density both in bacteria-treated and untreated plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1296 e1 “the growth of tomato plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–556 e2 “Meloidogyne javanica ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–126 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease d at 62500 plants/ha.
Treatment62500 plants/ha e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “further in crease in plant density up to 62500 plants/ha resulted in the decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1671 t0 “tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Fungal density in soil fell rapidly below acceptable control levels, which limits use of the fungus as a biocontrol agent.
Outcomefungal density in soil e7 Qualifierlimit the use of this fungus e7 Verbatim
t0 “Relationship between in oculum density of the nematophagous fungus Paeeilomyces Zilacinus and control of Meloidogyne arenaria on tomato (l) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–138 e7 “a rapid decrease in fungal density in soil below the acceptable control levels, limit the use of this fungus as a bioIogical control agent ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1236 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.