View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry fodder yield had high correlation, 0.953, with green fodder yield .
Taxonmulticut fodder sorghum t0 Outcomegreen fodder yield per plant e0 Qualifierdry fodder yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “dry fodder yield exhibited high correlation (0.953) coefficient with green fodder yield per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–525 t0 “multicut fodder sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–56 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry fodder yield had a high correlation of 0.953 with green fodder yield per plant.
TaxonMulticut Fodder Sorghum t0 Outcomedry fodder yield e1 Qualifierhigh correlation e1 Verbatim
e1 “dry fodder yield exhibited high correlation (0.953) coefficient ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–488 t0 “Multicut Fodder Sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–56 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry matter yield was positively correlated with green fodder yield .
OutcomeDry matter yield e0 Comparatorgreen fodder yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “Dry matter yield was significantly correlated with green fodder yield (P< 0.01) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–416 t0 “fodder barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–77 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Green fodder yield correlated positively with dry yield and daily productivity.
Outcomegreen fodder yield e0 Comparatordry fodder yield, green and dry fodder yield per day e0 Verbatim
e0 “The green fodder yield showed positive and significant correlation with dry fodder yield , green and dry fodder yield per day ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–628 t0 “Single Cut Sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–66 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Green fodder yield had a high direct effect on dry matter yield .
Outcomedry matter yield e0 Directionhigh direct effect e0 Comparatorgreen fodder yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “Only green fodder yield had high direct effect on dry matter yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1059 t0 “fodder barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–77 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Most traits had negative indirect effects on green fodder yield , except leaf width and dry fodder yield .
Outcomegreen fodder yield e0 Qualifierexcept leaf width and dry fodder yield e0 Verbatim
t0 “maize hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–27 e0 “most traits showed negative indirect effects on green fodder yield except leaf width and dry fodder yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1266 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Plant height had a high indirect effect on green fodder yield through dry fodder yield .
TaxonMulticut Fodder Sorghum t0 Outcomeindirect effect through dry fodder yield e6 Verbatim
e6 “indirect effect through dry fodder yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1031 e5 “should be given for plant height because of its significant correlation and high direct effect ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–970 t0 “Multicut Fodder Sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–56 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each day of sowing delay reduced dry fodder yield by 1.2%.
Outcomedry fodder yield e0 Not reported Organ / stage Treatment
Verbatim
t0 “fodder oat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–50 e0 “1.2% decrease in dry fodder yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–983 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Pearl millet showed dry fodder yield and green fodder yield variation as reported.
Outcomedry fodder yield and green fodder yield e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “pearl millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–53 e0 “Significant differences were observed among the genotypes for days to 50 % flowering, days to maturity, plant height, dry fodder yield and green fodder yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–408 Other claims from this paper (17) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Hybrid ICSA 693 x PKB 291 was high for green fodder yield and dry fodder yield .
MaterialICSA 693 x PKB 291 e2 Outcomegreen fodder yield and dry fodder yield e2 Verbatim
e0 “improved fodder yield in sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–125 e2 “ICSA 693 x PKB 291(L4 x T1) was high for four traits viz., plant height, leaf breadth, green fodder yield and dry fodder yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–803 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.