Search claims · PlantClaims

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged this practice economically feasible for weed control.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Outcome: efficient weed management and economically feasiblee0

Verbatim

e0
“this practice is both efficient weed management and economically feasible for effective controlof weeds in direct seeded rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1917

Title

Combined effect of new generation herbicides on weed population, soil microbial population and yield in direct seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.)

R Suganya; D J Sanjay; K S M Suresh; et al. Plant Science Today 2025. doi:10.14719/pst.9292

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Drum seeding gave the highest rice yield, comparable with manual wet seeding.
Intervention effect Drum seeding had the highest benefit-cost ratio, 2.22, versus 1.95 for manual wet seeding.
Intervention effect Low-dose new-generation herbicides did not detrimentally affect soil microbial population.
Intervention effect The sequential herbicide and hand-weeding practice produced the lowest weed population.
Intervention effect The sequential practice produced the highest weed control efficiency.
Intervention effect The sequential practice produced superior rice yield.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that this herbicide and hand-weeding sequence is efficient and economically feasible for drum-seeded rice.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Outcome: efficient weed management practicee0
Qualifier: economically feasible methode0

Verbatim

e0
“it is an efficient weed management practice and an economically feasible method for achieving the maximum growth, yield and economics of drum seeded rice.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1528

Title

Effect of chemical weed management on growth, yield and economics of drum seeded rice (Oryza sativa)

R. SUGANYA Indian Journal of Agronomy 2024. doi:10.59797/ija.v69i3.5517

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined practice had the lowest weed management cost, Rupees 6075.0.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae2
Treatment: combined practice of pre-emergence weedicide application followed by manual weedinge1
Outcome: cost of weed managemente0
Direction: loweste0
Value: Rupees 6075.0e0

Verbatim

e0
“lowest cost of weed management (Rupees 6075.0)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1253

e1
“combined practice of pre-emergence weedicide application followed by manual weeding”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1057

e2
“aerobic rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–97

Title

Developing efficient weed management practices for higher productivity and profitability in aerobic rice (Oryza sativa) cultivation

A GHOSH; R K SINGH; O N SINGH; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2018. doi:10.56093/ijas.v88i10.84215

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Intensive weed management had the highest weed control efficiency, around 60%.
Intervention effect Intensive weed management had the lowest weed index, around 15%.
Observation Intensive weed management was uneconomical because of higher management costs.
Observation Butachlor followed by manual weeding was the most economically viable practice.
Intervention effect The combined practice produced around 35% weed control efficiency.
Intervention effect The combined practice produced a 22.12% weed index.
Intervention effect Intensive weed management had significantly higher grain yield of 3.70 - 3.89 t/ha.
Observation Twice manual weeding yielded 3.61 - 3.62 t/ha.
Intervention effect The combined practice produced comparatively less grain yield of 3.47 - 3.50 t/ha.
Observation The combined practice gave higher net return of Rupees 15250.0.
Observation The combined practice had a B:C ratio of 1.48.
Recommendation The authors recommend pre-emergence weedicide plus one manual weeding for weed control.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify the integrated treatment as the most profitable weed management practice for vegetable pea.

Taxon: vegetable peat0
Outcome: most profitable integrated weed management practicee0

Verbatim

t0
“vegetable pea (Pisum sativum var. hortense)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–135

e0
“pendimethalin @0.75 kg a.i./ha(pre-emergence) + one hand weeding at 40 DAS proved to be most profitable integrated weed management practice for vegetable pea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1533

Title

Efficient integrated weed management practices for higher productivity and profitability in vegetable pea (Pisum sativum var. hortense)

D P SINGH; RAJIV RAJIV; MEENAKSHI KUMARI; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2019. doi:10.56093/ijas.v89i11.95347

Other claims from this paper (9)

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified ready-mix herbicide followed by hand weeding as an efficient, economical practice.

Taxon: groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment: Pendimethalin 30 EC + Imazethapyr 2 EC (ready mix) @ 1.0 kg a.i//ha on 3 DAS as pre-emergence followed by one hand weeding at 25-30 DASe0
Outcome: efficient and economical weed management practicee0

Verbatim

t0
“Groundnut”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–65

e0
“application of Pendimethalin 30 EC + Imazethapyr 2 EC (ready mix) @ 1.0 kg a.i//ha on 3 DAS as pre-emergence followed by one hand weeding at 25-30 DAS was identified as efficient and economical weed management practice for groundnut.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1688

Title

Weed Management Strategies for Enhanced Productivity in Groundnut

T. Parthipan Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology 2020. doi:10.9734/cjast/2020/v39i2930952

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Ready-mix herbicide followed by hand weeding yielded weed density of 33.3 No/m2.
Intervention effect That strategy yielded weed dry weight of 113 g/m2.
Intervention effect That strategy yielded 2400 kg/ha of pods.
Observation That strategy returned Rs. 62851/- per ha.
Observation That strategy had a benefit-cost ratio of 1.91.
Intervention effect Pendimethalin followed by Imazethapyr yielded 1600 kg/ha of pods.
Observation That sequence had a benefit-cost ratio of 1.38.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Training rice farmers in efficient weed control, water management and land preparation is recommended for DSR.

Taxon: Direct-seeded Rice (DSR) Technology in the Philippinest0
Outcome: efficient weed control techniquese1

Verbatim

t0
“Direct-seeded Rice (DSR) Technology in the Philippines”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–82

e1
“training and encouraging rice farmers to practice efficient weed control techniques including proper water management and land preparation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1720

Title

Adoption and Performance of Direct-seeded Rice (DSR) Technology in the Philippines

Aerone Philippe Bautista; Alice Mataia; Chona Austria; et al. The Philippine journal of science 2023. doi:10.56899/152.01.37

Other claims from this paper (11)

Observation The proportion of DSR farmer-adopters rose from 27% in 1996/1997 to 33–42% in 2016/2017.
Intervention effect Adoption of DSR lowered labour use and cost in crop establishment relative to transplanted rice.
Intervention effect Adoption of DSR raised labour productivity relative to transplanted rice.
Intervention effect DSR yield was lower than that of transplanted rice (TPR).
Intervention effect DSR seed and herbicide costs were higher than those of transplanted rice (TPR).
Intervention effect Shifting to DSR gave incremental income, especially in rainfed areas and during the dry season.
Association Area, seed and pesticide use and labour use significantly affected farmer adoption of DSR.
Association Tenurial status, irrigation and power cost significantly affected farmer adoption of DSR.
Recommendation Promoting DSR as a viable alternative to transplanted rice in suitable areas is recommended.
Recommendation Drum seeders and similar technologies are recommended to save seeds and labour in DSR.
Recommendation Developing rice varieties and technologies ideal for DSR is recommended.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Male workers were more efficient than female workers operating the weeder.

Taxon: Rice cropOryza sativat0
Outcome: more efficiente0
Direction: more efficiente0
Comparator: female workere0

Verbatim

t0
“Rice crop”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–65

e0
“male workers were more efficient than female worker”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1400

Title

Weed Management practice by Single Row Power Weeder for Rice crop

Shubham Pandey; AK Verma; Animesh Chandravanshi International Journal of Chemical Studies 2019

Other claims from this paper (8)

Method / resource The single row power weeder reduced time and significantly improved weeding efficiency and quality.
Method / resource Field capacity was 0.05 ha/h for male operators.
Method / resource Field capacity was 0.047 ha/h for female operators.
Method / resource Weeding efficiency was 80.95% for male operators.
Method / resource Weeding efficiency was 80.5% for female operators.
Method / resource Male operators had greater operational speed than female operators, 0.7 versus 0.64 m/s.
Intervention effect Three power weeding operations produced significantly higher grain yield than chemical, two or single weeding, at 48.74 qt/ha.
Recommendation The authors recommend three weeding operations at 15, 25 and 35 DAT as economical for production.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxidiazon plus one hand weeding was among the most effective and economic weed management practices.

Taxon: onionAllium cepat0
Treatment: Oxidiazon 0.75 kglhae0
Outcome: most effective, efficient and economice0
Direction: most effectivee0
Comparator: conventional practice of 2 hand weddingse0

Verbatim

e0
“Oxidiazon 0.75 kglha or Oxyfluorfen 0.24 kglha as pre emergence application along with 1 hand weeding 40 days after transplanting (DAT) days after sowing (DAS) as well as conventional practice of 2 hand weddings (at 20 and 40 DATJDAS) proved most effective, efficient and economic”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–577

t0
“onion”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30

Title

Response of rainy season onion (Allium cepa) to sowing methods and weed management practices

N.M. SUKHADIA; B.B. RAMANI; M.G. DUDHATRA Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v47i2.3159

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effect Transplanting performed better than broadcast sowing.
Intervention effect Oxyfluorfen plus one hand weeding was among the most effective and economic weed management practices.
Intervention effect Two hand weedings were among the most effective and economic practices.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxyfluorfen plus one hand weeding was among the most effective and economic weed management practices.

Taxon: onionAllium cepat0
Treatment: Oxyfluorfen 0.24 kglhae0
Outcome: most effective, efficient and economice0
Direction: most effectivee0
Comparator: conventional practice of 2 hand weddingse0

Verbatim

e0
“Oxidiazon 0.75 kglha or Oxyfluorfen 0.24 kglha as pre emergence application along with 1 hand weeding 40 days after transplanting (DAT) days after sowing (DAS) as well as conventional practice of 2 hand weddings (at 20 and 40 DATJDAS) proved most effective, efficient and economic”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–577

t0
“onion”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30

Title

Response of rainy season onion (Allium cepa) to sowing methods and weed management practices

N.M. SUKHADIA; B.B. RAMANI; M.G. DUDHATRA Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v47i2.3159

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effect Transplanting performed better than broadcast sowing.
Intervention effect Oxidiazon plus one hand weeding was among the most effective and economic weed management practices.
Intervention effect Two hand weedings were among the most effective and economic practices.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicides were as efficient as the weed-free condition during the first year.

Taxon: blackgramVigna mungoe0
Treatment: herbicidese2
Outcome: efficiente2
Direction: no_changeinferrede2
Qualifier: during the first yeare2
Comparator: weed-free conditione2

Verbatim

e0
“Field investigations were conducted for two consecutive kharif seasons in 1982 and 1983 at the Directorate of Pulses Research (ICAR), Kanpur, to determine an efficient weed management practice for blackgram (cv. PS 1) under rainfed conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–242

e2
“These herbicides were as efficient as weed-free condition during the first year”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–520

Title

Integrated Weed Managemet in Blackgram1

Masood Ali Indian Journal of Weed Science 1984

Other claims from this paper (2)

Intervention effect Oxadiazon and fluchloralin reduced weed growth in blackgram compared with the unweeded check.
Intervention effect Oxadiazon and fluchloralin enhanced blackgram yield by 31% over the unweeded check.

“efficient weed management practice”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics