View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result negative significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Temperature data errors influenced both crop models significantly more than precipitation errors .
influence on both models e0 errors in precipitation e0 Verbatim
e0 “errors in temperature data have a significantly stronger influence on both models than errors in precipitation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–631 t0 “a process-based crop model and a statistical crop model ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–506 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The approach significantly reduced inspection time and errors .
inspection time and errors e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “This approach significantly reduces inspection time and errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1409 t0 “Apple ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 Other claims from this paper (1) Method / resource observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Prediction errors were significantly smaller for all risk categories.
prediction errors e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “prediction errors for all risk categories were significantly smaller ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–770 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Fagus model prediction errors reached 13.0 days and were significantly below benchmark errors .
Errors associated with the modelled predictions e0 overall mean (null model) e0 Verbatim
e0 “Errors associated with the modelled predictions are up to 13.0 days in Fagus and 10.3 days in Quercus , which are significantly lower than errors associated with (1) the overall mean (null model) or (2) previously published modelling frameworks ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–1118 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Quercus model prediction errors reached 10.3 days and were significantly below benchmark errors .
Errors associated with the modelled predictions e0 previously published modelling frameworks e0 Verbatim
e0 “Errors associated with the modelled predictions are up to 13.0 days in Fagus and 10.3 days in Quercus , which are significantly lower than errors associated with (1) the overall mean (null model) or (2) previously published modelling frameworks ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–1118 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Representativeness errors differed significantly across levels.
representativeness errors e0 different levels e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “results show significant differences of representativeness errors at different levels. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1045 t0 “Leaf Area Index ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–97 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Evaluator errors varied significantly.
errors made by evaluators e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was significant ( P ≤ 0·001) variability amongst the errors made by evaluators ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1028 t0 “tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
DroneZaic techniques significantly reduced mosaic errors .
errors in the output mosaics e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Together, these techniques significantly reduce errors in the output mosaics. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1115 e1 “maize lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1260 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Standard errors for all independent-variable subsets were reported significant.
Horticultural Plants t0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “standard errors for all subsets of the independent variables were found to be significant at the p ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1750 t0 “Horticultural Plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–74 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Optimized stereo matching significantly reduced disparity errors .
disparity errors e0 census stereo matching algorithm e0 Verbatim
e0 “the census stereo matching algorithm was optimized, significantly reducing disparity errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–811 t0 “tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 Other claims from this paper (2) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Malus domestica
Triticum aestivum_in_Humlamaden_1516.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Fagus
Quercus
Solanum lycopersicum
Zea mays