Refine

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSR polymorphism information content was 80%.

Outcome
polymorphism information content (PIC)e0
Value
80%e0

Verbatim

e0

“polymorphism information content (PIC) was 80%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–577
t0

“apple cultivars/rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–54

Title

Molecular identification of apple cultivars/rootstocks using SSR markers

Romina Jahromi Shirazi; Mansoure keshavarzi; Mohammad Reza Naqavi DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2010. doi:10.22103/jab.2010.1155

Other claims from this paper (4)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polymorphism information content averaged 0.678.

Taxon
Lycium ruthenicumLycium ruthenicumt0
Outcome
polymorphism information content (PIC)e0
Value
0.678e0

Verbatim

e0

“polymorphism information content (PIC) (0.678)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1376
t0

“Lycium ruthenicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–90

Title

SSR information in transcriptome and development of molecular markers in Lycium ruthenicum

Yin Yue; An Wei; Zhao Jian-hua; et al. 浙江农林大学学报 2019. doi:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.02.025

Other claims from this paper (19)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polymorphism information content varied among cultivars.

Outcome
polymorphism information content(PIC)e0
Direction
diversitye0

Verbatim

e0

“the polymorphism information content(PIC) was diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–668
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–57

Title

Evaluation for adaptability of cultivars of exotic potato in Yunnan conditions.

Qiongfen Yang; Li XianPing; Lili Lu; et al. Xi'nan nongye xuebao 2009

Other claims from this paper (7)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average polymorphism information content was 0.5.

Outcome
polymorphism information contente0
Value
0.5e0

Verbatim

e0

“average polymorphism information content of 0.5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–678
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51

Title

Genetic diversity analysis of North Africa’s barley using SSR markers

Amani Ben Naceur; Ramzi Chaabane; Mouldi El-Faleh; et al. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 2012. doi:10.1016/j.jgeb.2011.12.003

Other claims from this paper (7)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average polymorphism information content was 0.595.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
polymorphism information content (PIC)e0
Value
0.595e0

Verbatim

e0

“average polymorphism information content (PIC) was 0.595”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–596
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28

Title

Genetic Diversity of Soybean Germplasm in Russia and China

PU Guo-feng 2008

Other claims from this paper (6)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polymorphism information content was 0.37.

Outcome
polymorphism information content(PIC)e0
Value
0.37e0

Verbatim

e0

“The value of polymorphism information content(PIC)was 0.37”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–663
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–66

Title

Polymorphism Analysis for Four Mainly Restore Lines of Hybrid Rice with SSR Markers

Chen Jin-we; R China Fujian nongye xuebao 2014

Other claims from this paper (6)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polymorphism information content was 0.664.

Outcome
polymorphism information contente0
Value
0.664e0

Verbatim

t0

“safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–34
e0

“polymorphism information content (0.664)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–573

Title

The genetic diversity of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) genotypes developed by hybridization using SSR markers

Emrullah Culpan; Burhan Arslan Genetika 2022. doi:10.2298/gensr2203193c

Other claims from this paper (9)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean polymorphism information content was 0.52.

Outcome
Polymorphism Information Content (PIC)e0
Value
0.52e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The average Polymorphism Information Content (PIC) was 0.52.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–892

Title

Genetic variability in maize and teosinte populations estimated by microsatellites markers

Tatiana de Freitas Terra; Paula Wiethölter; Cícero Carlos de Souza Almeida; et al. Ciência Rural 2011. doi:10.1590/s0103-84782011005000005

Other claims from this paper (6)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average polymorphism information content was 0.4663.

Taxon
Soft Wheatt0
Outcome
polymorphism information contente0
Value
0.4663e0

Verbatim

e0

“The average polymorphism information content was 0.4663.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–697
t0

“Soft Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64

Title

Association Analysis of Solvent Retention Capacity in Soft Wheat

Zhang Yon 2015

Other claims from this paper (14)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean polymorphism information content was 0.55.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
Mean polymorphism information contente0
Value
0.55e0

Verbatim

e0

“Mean polymorphism information content was 0.55.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–385
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43

Title

Heterotic Grouping of Quality Protein Maize Inbreds Divided by SSR Markers

Fan Xing ACTA AGRONOMICA SINICA 2003

Other claims from this paper (8)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.