View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mean relative model errors were below 7%.
Outcomemean relative errors e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “mean relative errors less than 7% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–904 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Models had mean relative errors close to 10%.
Outcomemean relative errors e0 Verbatim
e0 “mean relative errors close to 10% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1505 t0 “tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The coupled predictive equation achieved relative errors below 5%.
Verbatim
t0 “Chimonobambusa utilis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–111 e7 “achieving relative errors below 5% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1345 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Validation relative errors for the cotton water content models were below 18%.
Outcomerelative errors (RE) e0 Verbatim
e0 “relative errors (RE) were less than 18% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1416 t0 “cotton plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–25 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Eighty-three percent of sample points had relative errors below 18.5%.
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “83% of sample points had relative errors below 18.5% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–844 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Most species biomass average relative errors were less than 10%.
Outcomeaverage relative errors e4 Verbatim
t0 “Alpine Meadow ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–53 e4 “most species biomass' average relative errors were less than 10% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1256 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Simulated wheat LAI had relative errors below ten percent.
Outcomerelative errors of predicted LAI e0 Valueless than ten percent e0 Verbatim
e0 “The simulation results showed that the relative errors of predicted LAI were less than ten percent ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–406 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 Other claims from this paper (1) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Only 13.8% of test images had relative errors below 2%.
Outcomerelative errors below 2% e2 Verbatim
t0 “Helianthus annuus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–101 e2 “Only 13.8% of test images had relative errors below 2% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1149 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The maize soil-water model had average relative errors of 5.26% to 7.85%.
Outcomeaverage relative errors e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “the average relative errors are 5.26% to 7.85% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–352 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
APSIM yield predictions were sensitive to water balance carryover errors , sometimes causing large relative yield errors .
Outcomepredicted relative yields e1 Qualifierin some seasons large errors e1 Comparatorwater balance e1 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “growth of a wheat crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–946 e1 “Yield predictions with APSIM were sensitive to carry-over errors in the water balance from one season to the next, so that in some seasons large errors occurred in the predicted relative yields. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1860–2054 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.