Refine

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean relative model errors were below 7%.

Outcome
mean relative errorse0
Direction
less thane0
Value
less than 7%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“mean relative errors less than 7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–904

Title

Factor de la reflectancia bi-cónica en especies vegetales contrastantes: modelación global

Fernando Paz Pellat; Alejandro Cano; Martín Bolaños; et al. Terra Latinoamericana 2018. doi:10.28940/terra.v36i1.222

Other claims from this paper (2)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Models had mean relative errors close to 10%.

Outcome
mean relative errorse0
Value
close to 10%e0

Verbatim

e0

“mean relative errors close to 10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1505
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–26

Title

Novel estimation of tomato soluble solids content using linearly transformed reflectance-based spectral indices

Naisen Liu; Yuan Fang; Yongzhen Zhao; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2026. doi:10.3389/fpls.2026.1729375

Other claims from this paper (6)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The coupled predictive equation achieved relative errors below 5%.

Taxon
Chimonobambusa utilisChimonobambusa utilist0
Outcome
relative errorse7
Value
below 5%e7

Verbatim

t0

“Chimonobambusa utilis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–111
e7

“achieving relative errors below 5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1345

Title

Effect of Specimen Dimensions and Strain Rate on the Longitudinal Compressive Strength of Chimonobambusa utilis

Xudan Wang; Meng Zhang; Chunnan Liu; et al. Materials 2025. doi:10.3390/ma18174013

Other claims from this paper (5)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Validation relative errors for the cotton water content models were below 18%.

Outcome
relative errors (RE)e0
Direction
less thane0
Value
18%e0

Verbatim

e0

“relative errors (RE) were less than 18%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1416
t0

“cotton plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–25

Title

Retrieval of cotton plant water content by UAV-based vegetation supply water index (VSWI)

Shuobo Chen; Yinwen Chen; Junying Chen; et al. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2020. doi:10.1080/01431161.2020.1718234

Other claims from this paper (7)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eighty-three percent of sample points had relative errors below 18.5%.

Outcome
relative errorse0
Direction
belowe0
Value
83%e0
Qualifier
below 18.5%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“83% of sample points had relative errors below 18.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–844

Title

A Monitoring Method for Agricultural Soil Moisture Using Wireless Sensors and the Biswas Model

Yuanzhen Zhang; Guofang Wang; Lingzhi Li; et al. Agriculture 2025. doi:10.3390/agriculture15030344

Other claims from this paper (4)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most species biomass average relative errors were less than 10%.

Taxon
alpine meadowt0
Outcome
average relative errorse4
Direction
less thane4
Value
10%e4

Verbatim

t0

“Alpine Meadow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–53
e4

“most species biomass' average relative errors were less than 10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1256

Title

Estimation of Aboveground Biomass in an Alpine Meadow on the Eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau

Zhang Diany Mountain Research 2014

Other claims from this paper (7)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated wheat LAI had relative errors below ten percent.

Outcome
relative errors of predicted LAIe0
Direction
less thane0
Value
less than ten percente0

Verbatim

e0

“The simulation results showed that the relative errors of predicted LAI were less than ten percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–406
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38

Title

Simulation on leaf area index in wheat

Tiemei Liu; Weixing Cao; Weihong Luo; et al. Mailei zuowu xuebao 2001

Other claims from this paper (1)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only 13.8% of test images had relative errors below 2%.

Taxon
Helianthus annuusHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
relative errors below 2%e2
Value
13.8%e2

Verbatim

t0

“Helianthus annuus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–101
e2

“Only 13.8% of test images had relative errors below 2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1149

Title

Rapid Classification and Deep Learning-Based Development Estimation of the Seeds of Helianthus annuus

Fami A. Mume; Daniil S. Ulyanov; Temur R. Muratov; et al. Plants 2026. doi:10.3390/plants15131930

Other claims from this paper (5)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maize soil-water model had average relative errors of 5.26% to 7.85%.

Outcome
average relative errorse0
Value
5.26% to 7.85%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the average relative errors are 5.26% to 7.85%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–352

Title

A Dynamic Simulation of Soil Water Transport Under Controlled Alternative Irrigation of Maize

Peng Xu 2010

Other claims from this paper (3)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

APSIM yield predictions were sensitive to water balance carryover errors, sometimes causing large relative yield errors.

Outcome
predicted relative yieldse1
Qualifier
in some seasons large errorse1
Comparator
water balancee1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“growth of a wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–946
e1

“Yield predictions with APSIM were sensitive to carry-over errors in the water balance from one season to the next, so that in some seasons large errors occurred in the predicted relative yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1860–2054

Title

Modelling water, nitrogen, and crop yield for a long-term fallow management experiment

ME Probert; BA Keating; JP Thompson; et al. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 1995. doi:10.1071/ea9950941

Other claims from this paper (7)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.