View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Two neotypes are designated.
Verbatim
e0 “one lectotype and two neotypes are designated here ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–730 t0 “juno irises ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–49 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The revision designated two neotypes .
Verbatim
e0 “Ten lectotypes and two neotypes were designated here ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–913 t0 “Ficus sect. Pharmacosycea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–51 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors propose two neotypes for Nototriche -related names.
Verbatim
e0 “two neotypes are here proposed for twenty-eightnames related to the genusNototriche ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–267 Other claims from this paper (1) Observation observed original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Two neotypes were designated for Manettia names.
Verbatim
e0 “As a result five lectotypes and two neotypes are here designated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–294 t0 “Manettia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–35 Other claims from this paper (1) Observation observed original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Two neotypes are designated in Amaranthaceae.
Outcomeneotypes are designated e2 Verbatim
t0 “Amaranthaceae ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–75 e2 “Two neotypes are designated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1297 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Neotypes were designated for two names.
Outcomeneotypes are designated e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “neotypes are designated for two names ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2623–2660 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The checklist designated two neotypes .
Outcomedesignation of 54 lectotypes and two neotypes e0 Verbatim
e0 “including the designation of 54 lectotypes and two neotypes . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–566 t0 “Carpinus and Ostrya ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–77 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The revision designated two Sonchus neotypes .
Verbatim
t0 “Canarian Sonchus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–54 e0 “two neotypes and two epitypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–641 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Two neotypes were superseded by lectotypes.
Outcomeneotypes proposed by them are superseded by lectotypes e0 Verbatim
e0 “two neotypes proposed by them are superseded by lectotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–311 t0 “Helichrysum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–36 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors designated two neotypes .
Verbatim
t0 “grass names ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–61 e0 “In addition, 13 second-step lectotypes (one by JFV), and two neotypes are designated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–311 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.