View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Biological yield per plot was positively correlated with grain yield per plot at 0.932.
grain yield per plot e0 biological yield per plot e0 Verbatim
e0 “positive associations of number of tillers per meter (0.487), harvest index (0.499) and biological yield per plot (0.932) with grain yield per plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1482 e1 “Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Biological yield per plot and grain yield per plot had high heritability and genetic advance.
biological yield per plot, and grain yield per plot e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “biological yield per plot , and grain yield per plot have high heritability coupled with high genetic advance as a per cent of mean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1064 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield per hectare was significantly and positively correlated with grain yield per plot and straw yield per plot .
grain yield per plot and straw yield per plot e1 Verbatim
t0 “finger millet (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–84 e1 “The genotypic and phenotypic correlation of grain yield /ha was significant and positive with number of tillers per plant, length of finger, harvest index, grain yield per plot and straw yield per plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–362 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
T5 yield per plot was 5.15 kg plot −1.
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “yield per plot (5.15 kg plot −1) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1115 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Testers differed significantly for green fodder yield per plot and grain yield per plot .
green fodder yield per plot and grain yield per plot e3 Verbatim
e0 “Four inbred lines of teosinte ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–250 e3 “While testers were varied significantly for green fodder yield per plot and grain yield per plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–833 Other claims from this paper (19) Observation Significant differences among crosses were found for all studied traits. Observation Lines differed significantly for 100-grain weight and grain yield per plot. Observation Cross × year and L × T × year interactions were significant for all studied traits, except number of tillers per plant (cross × year) and crude protein (L × T × year). Association Parent of inbred line-1 had the highest positive and significant GCA effect for TDN, 100-grain weight and grain yield per plot. Association Parent of inbred line-1 showed desirable GCA for number of tassling date (toward earliness). Association Line-3 had positive and significant GCA for green fodder yield per plot and 100-grain weight. Association The 30k8 (T1) tester was a good general combiner for 100-grain weight, crude protein and grain yield per plot. Association T2 and T3 testers were good general combiners for green fodder yield per plot and TDN. Association Top cross L1 × T3 had the highest SCA effects for TDN, number of tillers per plant and tassling date (toward earliness). Association Top cross L1 × T3 had the highest SCA effects for crude protein and grain yield per plot. Association General combining ability variance (σ²GCA) was larger than specific combining ability variance (σ²SCA) for green fodder yield per plot, 100-grain weight and grain yield per plot. Association σ²SCA was larger than σ²GCA for TDN, number of tillers per plant and plant height. Association σ²SCA was larger than σ²GCA for tassling date and crude protein percentage. Association All topcrosses were superior to their parents of teosinte for green fodder yield per plot and tassling date (toward earliness), except (L2 × T2) and (L2 × T3). Association All topcrosses were superior to their parents of teosinte for grain yield per plot and 100-grain weight, except (L2 × T2) and (L2 × T3). Association All topcrosses were superior to their parents of teosinte for crude protein, except (L2 × T3). Observation Top crosses for crude protein were L2 × T1, L3 × T1 and L4 × T1; for grain yield per plot they were L1 × T3, L1 × T2, L4 × T1, L2 × T1 and L3 × T1. Recommendation Top crosses can be used for improvement in green fodder yield and grain yield, for silage in the dough stage. Recommendation Inbred lines L1 and L3 could be recommended for advanced stage of evaluation through the breeding program. Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Biological yield per plot , seed yield per plot and days to 50 per cent flowering contributed most to genetic diversity in chickpea.
genetic diversity e4 biological yield per plot, seed yield per plot and days to 50 per cent flowering contributed maximum e4 Verbatim
e1 “among the 64 genotypes of chickpea that included 60 interspecific derivatives ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–389 e4 “Characters like biological yield per plot , seed yield per plot and days to 50 per cent flowering contributed maximum towards the genetic diversity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1040 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield per plot positively correlated with biological yield per plot under moisture stress, r = 0.93.
Grain yield per plot e0 positively correlated e0 biological yield per plot e0 Verbatim
e0 “Grain yield per plot was positively correlated (r = 0.93) with biological yield per plot in MS conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1218 t0 “Evaluation of Bread Wheat Genotypes for Water Stress Tolerance Using Agronomic Traits ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–85 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Moderate genotypic coefficients of variation were recorded for seed yield per hectare, seed yield per plot and oil yield per plot in Brassica carinata .
genotypic coefficients of variation e3 Verbatim
t0 “Ethiopian Mustard (Brassica Carinata A Braun) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–103 e3 “moderate genotypic coefficients of variation recorded by seed yield per hectare, seed yield per plot and oil yield per plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1252 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Biological yield per plot showed the largest direct positive path effect on grain yield per plot and harvest index.
grain yield per plot and harvest index e0 maximum direct positive effect e0 biological yield per plot e0 Not reported Material Organ / stage
Verbatim
e0 “biological yield per plot had the maximum direct positive effect on grain yield per plot and harvest index ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1117 e1 “The wheat genotypes were sown ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–161 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
With straw mulch, total tomato yield per plot was 3.70 kg / plot .
total yield per plot e0 Verbatim
e0 “the total yield per plot was 3.70 kg / plot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1366 t0 “TANAMAN TOMAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–35 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect Mulch type significantly affected tomato growth and yield. Intervention effect Straw mulch at 10 t / ha gave better tomato growth rates. Intervention effect Straw mulch at 10 t / ha gave better tomato yields. Observation With straw mulch, tomato height was 34.37 cm at 3 MST. Observation With straw mulch, tomato height was 70.27 cm at 6 MST. Observation With straw mulch, tomato stem diameter was 2.31 mm at 3 weeks. Observation With straw mulch, tomato stem diameter was 2.41 mm at 6 weeks. Observation With straw mulch, the number of tomato branches was 0.60 at 3 MST. Observation With straw mulch, the number of tomato branches was 5.80 pieces at 6 MST. Observation With straw mulch, tomato yield I was 0.93 kg / plot. Observation With straw mulch, tomato yield II was 0.99 kg / plot. Observation With straw mulch, tomato yield III was 1.79 kg / plot. Observation With straw mulch, tomato harvest yield per hectare was 6.17 t / ha. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivum
Eleusine coracana
Cicer arietinum
Brassica carinata