By research area › Plant interactions & biotic stress › Recommendation

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Effective spraying should target very young leaf-folders or eggs.

Taxon: appleMalus domesticat0
Interactor: leaf-folderse0pest
Outcome: spraying must be done when the leaf-folders are very young, or when they are still in the egg stagee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“To be effective, spraying must be done when the leaf-folders are very young, or when they are still in the egg stage.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–689

t0
“apple”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16

Title

The lesser apple leaf-folder

R. L. Webster Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) 1908

Other claims from this paper (5)

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The recommended spray times are leaf emergence, the first week of June and the first week of August.

Taxon: appleMalus domesticat0
Outcome: proper times to spraye0
Qualifier: as soon as the leaves appear; second, the first week in June; third, the first week in Auguste0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“The proper times to spray, as determined by the experimental work in this state, are as follow s: First, as soon as the leaves appear; second, the first week in June; third, the first week in August.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–889

t0
“apple”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16

Title

The lesser apple leaf-folder

R. L. Webster Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) 1908

Other claims from this paper (5)

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advocated cultivation for hardier growth and scale resistance, even at a cost to growth.

Taxon: appleMalus domesticae1
Outcome: greater hardiness even at the expense of mere growthe0

Verbatim

e0
“try to secure one that would give greater hardiness even at the expense of mere growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1798–1884

e1
“old orchards, chiefly apple”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–308

Title

Cultivation and Susceptibility to Insect Attack

John B. Smith Journal of Economic Entomology 1908. doi:10.1093/jee/1.1.15

Other claims from this paper (7)

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The report recommends insecticide and fungicide spraying to prevent apple disease and codling moth damage in the Ozarks.

Taxon: applesMalus domesticae0
Treatment: spraying of apples with insecticides and fungicidese0
Interactor: codling mothCydia pomonellae0pest
Outcome: prevent damage from bitter-rot, apple blotch, leaf-spot diseases, apple scab, and the codling mothe0
Setting: Ozarkse0

Verbatim

e0
“Report promoting the spraying of apples with insecticides and fungicides in the Ozarks in order to prevent damage from bitter-rot, apple blotch, leaf-spot diseases, apple scab, and the codling moth.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–198

Title

Spraying for Apple Diseases and the Codling Moth in the Ozarks

A. L. Quaintance University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) 1907

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Hot-water treatment was advised to prevent oats smut and wheat bunt.

Taxon: oatsAvena sativae0
Treatment: hot watere0
Outcome: prevent oats smute0

Verbatim

e0
“there is no longer any doubt as to the advisability of treating to prevent oats smut and bunt of wheat with hot water.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–249

Title

Prevention of corn oats smut

L. H. Pammel; F. C. Stewart Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) 1888

Other claims from this paper (4)

Recommendation Hot-water treatment was advised to prevent wheat bunt.
Intervention effect Seed treatment could not prevent loose smut of wheat.
Intervention effect Treated corn contained as much smut as the check.
Observation Smut of corn can enter any growing tissue.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Hot-water treatment was advised to prevent wheat bunt.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: hot watere0
Outcome: bunt of wheate0

Verbatim

e0
“there is no longer any doubt as to the advisability of treating to prevent oats smut and bunt of wheat with hot water.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 131–249

Title

Prevention of corn oats smut

L. H. Pammel; F. C. Stewart Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) 1888

Other claims from this paper (4)

Recommendation Hot-water treatment was advised to prevent oats smut and wheat bunt.
Intervention effect Seed treatment could not prevent loose smut of wheat.
Intervention effect Treated corn contained as much smut as the check.
Observation Smut of corn can enter any growing tissue.

Recommendationauthor interpretationreview summarypositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting remaining potatoes after some plants show rot may save part of the crop.

Taxon: PotatoSolanum tuberosumt0
Outcome: by harvesting the rest, save a portion of the crope0

Verbatim

t0
“Potato Rot”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 4–14

e0
“having seen that some plants are rotting, he can then, by harvesting the rest, save a portion of the crop.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2951–3057

Title

The Potato Rot

W. G. Farlow Bulletin of the Bussey Institution 1874. doi:10.5962/p.355230

Other claims from this paper (6)

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend at least 40 m for clear-cutting eradication.

Taxon: PinePinust0
Outcome: clear-cutting eradicatione0
Value: at least 40 me0

Verbatim

e0
“a longer radius of at least 40 m is recommended for clear-cutting eradication”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1170

t0
“Pine Wilt Disease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–28

Title

Simulating Pine Wilt Disease Dispersal With an Individual-Based Model Incorporating Individual Movement Patterns of Vector Beetles

Xia Chunlei; Chon Tae-Soo; Takasu Fugo; et al. Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)

Other claims from this paper (8)

Method / resource Long- and middle-distance beetle movements established symptomatic and asymptomatic trees in the model.
Method / resource Pair correlations and pairwise distances were suitable for short- and long-scale evaluation.
Method / resource Model and field data agreed at infestation rates of 0.08 and 0.09.
Method / resource Model and field data agreed at asymptomatic rates of 0.16–0.17.
Intervention effect Eradication radii over 20 m effectively controlled symptomatic transmission.
Intervention effect Eradication radii of 20–40 m effectively controlled asymptomatic transmission.
Association Longer eradication radii controlled pine wilt disease more effectively.
Method / resource The IBM provided practical information for forest pest monitoring and management.

Recommendation 98,818 claims

98,818 claims