Claim · model-written summary
Model and field data agreed at asymptomatic rates of 0.16–0.17.
PinusNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The accordance between model and field data was observed in infestation rates at 0.08 and 0.09 and asymptomatic rates at 0.16–0.17 for disease dispersal.”
t0“Pine Wilt Disease”
Title
Xia Chunlei; Chon Tae-Soo; Takasu Fugo; et al. Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Method / resource Long- and middle-distance beetle movements established symptomatic and asymptomatic trees in the model.
- Method / resource Pair correlations and pairwise distances were suitable for short- and long-scale evaluation.
- Method / resource Model and field data agreed at infestation rates of 0.08 and 0.09.
- Intervention effect Eradication radii over 20 m effectively controlled symptomatic transmission.
- Intervention effect Eradication radii of 20–40 m effectively controlled asymptomatic transmission.
- Association Longer eradication radii controlled pine wilt disease more effectively.
- Recommendation The authors recommend at least 40 m for clear-cutting eradication.
- Method / resource The IBM provided practical information for forest pest monitoring and management.