Notodontidae 295 claims

family · order Lepidoptera · 25 taxa · NCBI Taxonomy ↗

25 entries

Thaumetopoea pityocampapine processionary moth · also pine processionary caterpillar · also pine processionary caterpillars52 claims · 16 papers Clostera anastomosispoplar tip moth · also C.anastomosis42 claims · 8 papers Clostera anachoretaalso C.anachoreta37 claims · 14 papers Micromelalopha troglodytaalso M.troglodyta29 claims · 9 papers Clostera restituraalso C. cupreata · also Clostera cupreata28 claims · 6 papers Thaumetopoea wilkinsoniCyprus processionary caterpillar22 claims · 2 papers Thaumetopoea solitaria20 claims · 2 papers Fentonia ocypetealso F.ocypete10 claims · 1 paper Notodontidaeprominent moths6 claims · 2 papers Phalera assimilis6 claims · 1 paper Tecmessa elegans6 claims · 1 paper Theroa zethus6 claims · 2 papers Micromelalopha sieversi5 claims · 2 papers Closteraalso Pygaera anastomosis4 claims · 1 paper Ochrogaster luniferBogong moth4 claims · 1 paper Cecrita guttivittasaddled prominent · also Heterocampa guttivitta Walker3 claims · 1 paper Cerura erminea3 claims · 1 paper Psorocampa denticulata2 claims · 1 paper Ptilophora plumigera2 claims · 1 paper Symmerista2 claims · 2 papers Symmerista albifrons2 claims · 2 papers Symmerista leucitys2 claims · 2 papers Thaumetopoea processionea2 claims · 2 papers Phalera bucephala1 claim · 1 paper Phalera flavescensJapanese buff-tip moth1 claim · 1 paper

295 claims

Open in search (filters, sorting) →

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Period significantly affected pine PAL content.

Taxon: Pinus brutia Ten.Pinus brutiat0
Interactor: Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams)Thaumetopoea wilkinsonit1herbivore
Outcome: PALe0

Verbatim

e0
“The study showed that the period factor had a statistically significant effect for PAL, tannin, gallic acid, catechin and rutin trihydrate contents.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–724

t0
“Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–57

t1
“pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams))”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–152

Title

Antioxidant Responses of Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) Clones to Damage Stress Caused by The pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams)) - Türkiye

YILMAZ, Ergin; AYAN, Sezgin PRSM 2026. doi:10.34874/imist.prsm/ted-v5i1.66564

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Period significantly affected pine tannin content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine gallic acid content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine catechin content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine rutin trihydrate content.
Observation Larval bag number, period and clone significantly affected pine PPO.
Observation Larval bag number, period, clone and their interaction significantly affected pine cinnamic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine caffeic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine chrysin.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine ferulic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine myricetin.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine naringenin.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine PPO increased.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine cinnamic acid increased.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine ferulic acid decreased.
Observation Pine PAL increased from February to August.
Observation Pine tannin increased from February to August.
Observation Pine caffeic acid increased from February to August.
Observation Pine ferulic acid increased from February to August.
Observation Pine rutin trihydrate increased from February to August.

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Period significantly affected pine tannin content.

Taxon: Pinus brutia Ten.Pinus brutiat0
Interactor: Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams)Thaumetopoea wilkinsonit1herbivore
Outcome: tannine0

Verbatim

e0
“The study showed that the period factor had a statistically significant effect for PAL, tannin, gallic acid, catechin and rutin trihydrate contents.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–724

t0
“Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–57

t1
“pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams))”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–152

Title

Antioxidant Responses of Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) Clones to Damage Stress Caused by The pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams)) - Türkiye

YILMAZ, Ergin; AYAN, Sezgin PRSM 2026. doi:10.34874/imist.prsm/ted-v5i1.66564

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Period significantly affected pine PAL content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine gallic acid content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine catechin content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine rutin trihydrate content.
Observation Larval bag number, period and clone significantly affected pine PPO.
Observation Larval bag number, period, clone and their interaction significantly affected pine cinnamic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine caffeic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine chrysin.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine ferulic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine myricetin.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine naringenin.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine PPO increased.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine cinnamic acid increased.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine ferulic acid decreased.
Observation Pine PAL increased from February to August.
Observation Pine tannin increased from February to August.
Observation Pine caffeic acid increased from February to August.
Observation Pine ferulic acid increased from February to August.
Observation Pine rutin trihydrate increased from February to August.

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Period significantly affected pine gallic acid content.

Taxon: Pinus brutia Ten.Pinus brutiat0
Interactor: Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams)Thaumetopoea wilkinsonit1herbivore
Outcome: gallic acide0

Verbatim

e0
“The study showed that the period factor had a statistically significant effect for PAL, tannin, gallic acid, catechin and rutin trihydrate contents.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–724

t0
“Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–57

t1
“pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams))”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–152

Title

Antioxidant Responses of Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) Clones to Damage Stress Caused by The pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams)) - Türkiye

YILMAZ, Ergin; AYAN, Sezgin PRSM 2026. doi:10.34874/imist.prsm/ted-v5i1.66564

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Period significantly affected pine PAL content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine tannin content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine catechin content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine rutin trihydrate content.
Observation Larval bag number, period and clone significantly affected pine PPO.
Observation Larval bag number, period, clone and their interaction significantly affected pine cinnamic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine caffeic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine chrysin.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine ferulic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine myricetin.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine naringenin.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine PPO increased.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine cinnamic acid increased.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine ferulic acid decreased.
Observation Pine PAL increased from February to August.
Observation Pine tannin increased from February to August.
Observation Pine caffeic acid increased from February to August.
Observation Pine ferulic acid increased from February to August.
Observation Pine rutin trihydrate increased from February to August.

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Period significantly affected pine catechin content.

Taxon: Pinus brutia Ten.Pinus brutiat0
Interactor: Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams)Thaumetopoea wilkinsonit1herbivore
Outcome: catechine0

Verbatim

e0
“The study showed that the period factor had a statistically significant effect for PAL, tannin, gallic acid, catechin and rutin trihydrate contents.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–724

t0
“Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–57

t1
“pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams))”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–152

Title

Antioxidant Responses of Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) Clones to Damage Stress Caused by The pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams)) - Türkiye

YILMAZ, Ergin; AYAN, Sezgin PRSM 2026. doi:10.34874/imist.prsm/ted-v5i1.66564

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Period significantly affected pine PAL content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine tannin content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine gallic acid content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine rutin trihydrate content.
Observation Larval bag number, period and clone significantly affected pine PPO.
Observation Larval bag number, period, clone and their interaction significantly affected pine cinnamic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine caffeic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine chrysin.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine ferulic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine myricetin.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine naringenin.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine PPO increased.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine cinnamic acid increased.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine ferulic acid decreased.
Observation Pine PAL increased from February to August.
Observation Pine tannin increased from February to August.
Observation Pine caffeic acid increased from February to August.
Observation Pine ferulic acid increased from February to August.
Observation Pine rutin trihydrate increased from February to August.

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Period significantly affected pine rutin trihydrate content.

Taxon: Pinus brutia Ten.Pinus brutiat0
Interactor: Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams)Thaumetopoea wilkinsonit1herbivore
Outcome: rutin trihydratee0

Verbatim

e0
“The study showed that the period factor had a statistically significant effect for PAL, tannin, gallic acid, catechin and rutin trihydrate contents.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–724

t0
“Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–57

t1
“pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams))”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–152

Title

Antioxidant Responses of Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) Clones to Damage Stress Caused by The pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams)) - Türkiye

YILMAZ, Ergin; AYAN, Sezgin PRSM 2026. doi:10.34874/imist.prsm/ted-v5i1.66564

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Period significantly affected pine PAL content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine tannin content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine gallic acid content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine catechin content.
Observation Larval bag number, period and clone significantly affected pine PPO.
Observation Larval bag number, period, clone and their interaction significantly affected pine cinnamic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine caffeic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine chrysin.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine ferulic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine myricetin.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine naringenin.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine PPO increased.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine cinnamic acid increased.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine ferulic acid decreased.
Observation Pine PAL increased from February to August.
Observation Pine tannin increased from February to August.
Observation Pine caffeic acid increased from February to August.
Observation Pine ferulic acid increased from February to August.
Observation Pine rutin trihydrate increased from February to August.

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Larval bag number, period and clone significantly affected pine PPO.

Taxon: Pinus brutia Ten.Pinus brutiat0
Interactor: Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams)Thaumetopoea wilkinsonit1herbivore
Outcome: PPOe0

Verbatim

e0
“The numbers of larval bag, period and clone had a statistically significant effect for PPO along with that the number of larval bag, period, clone and the numbers of larval bag * clone interaction had a statistically significant effect for cinnamic acid.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–979

t0
“Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–57

t1
“pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams))”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–152

Title

Antioxidant Responses of Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) Clones to Damage Stress Caused by The pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams)) - Türkiye

YILMAZ, Ergin; AYAN, Sezgin PRSM 2026. doi:10.34874/imist.prsm/ted-v5i1.66564

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Period significantly affected pine PAL content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine tannin content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine gallic acid content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine catechin content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine rutin trihydrate content.
Observation Larval bag number, period, clone and their interaction significantly affected pine cinnamic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine caffeic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine chrysin.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine ferulic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine myricetin.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine naringenin.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine PPO increased.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine cinnamic acid increased.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine ferulic acid decreased.
Observation Pine PAL increased from February to August.
Observation Pine tannin increased from February to August.
Observation Pine caffeic acid increased from February to August.
Observation Pine ferulic acid increased from February to August.
Observation Pine rutin trihydrate increased from February to August.

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Larval bag number, period, clone and their interaction significantly affected pine cinnamic acid.

Taxon: Pinus brutia Ten.Pinus brutiat0
Interactor: Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams)Thaumetopoea wilkinsonit1herbivore
Outcome: cinnamic acide0

Verbatim

e0
“The numbers of larval bag, period and clone had a statistically significant effect for PPO along with that the number of larval bag, period, clone and the numbers of larval bag * clone interaction had a statistically significant effect for cinnamic acid.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–979

t0
“Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–57

t1
“pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams))”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–152

Title

Antioxidant Responses of Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) Clones to Damage Stress Caused by The pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams)) - Türkiye

YILMAZ, Ergin; AYAN, Sezgin PRSM 2026. doi:10.34874/imist.prsm/ted-v5i1.66564

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Period significantly affected pine PAL content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine tannin content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine gallic acid content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine catechin content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine rutin trihydrate content.
Observation Larval bag number, period and clone significantly affected pine PPO.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine caffeic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine chrysin.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine ferulic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine myricetin.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine naringenin.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine PPO increased.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine cinnamic acid increased.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine ferulic acid decreased.
Observation Pine PAL increased from February to August.
Observation Pine tannin increased from February to August.
Observation Pine caffeic acid increased from February to August.
Observation Pine ferulic acid increased from February to August.
Observation Pine rutin trihydrate increased from February to August.

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine caffeic acid.

Taxon: Pinus brutia Ten.Pinus brutiat0
Interactor: Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams)Thaumetopoea wilkinsonit1herbivore
Outcome: caffeic acide0

Verbatim

e0
“Similarly, the period, clone, the numbers of larval bag * clone interaction had a statistically significant effect for caffeic acid and chrysin while the numbers of larval bag and period had a statistically significant effect for ferulic acid, and the period and clone had a statistically significant effect for myricetin and naringenin (P<0.05).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1326

t0
“Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–57

t1
“pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams))”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–152

Title

Antioxidant Responses of Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) Clones to Damage Stress Caused by The pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams)) - Türkiye

YILMAZ, Ergin; AYAN, Sezgin PRSM 2026. doi:10.34874/imist.prsm/ted-v5i1.66564

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Period significantly affected pine PAL content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine tannin content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine gallic acid content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine catechin content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine rutin trihydrate content.
Observation Larval bag number, period and clone significantly affected pine PPO.
Observation Larval bag number, period, clone and their interaction significantly affected pine cinnamic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine chrysin.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine ferulic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine myricetin.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine naringenin.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine PPO increased.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine cinnamic acid increased.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine ferulic acid decreased.
Observation Pine PAL increased from February to August.
Observation Pine tannin increased from February to August.
Observation Pine caffeic acid increased from February to August.
Observation Pine ferulic acid increased from February to August.
Observation Pine rutin trihydrate increased from February to August.

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine chrysin.

Taxon: Pinus brutia Ten.Pinus brutiat0
Interactor: Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams)Thaumetopoea wilkinsonit1herbivore
Outcome: chrysine0

Verbatim

e0
“Similarly, the period, clone, the numbers of larval bag * clone interaction had a statistically significant effect for caffeic acid and chrysin while the numbers of larval bag and period had a statistically significant effect for ferulic acid, and the period and clone had a statistically significant effect for myricetin and naringenin (P<0.05).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1326

t0
“Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–57

t1
“pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams))”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–152

Title

Antioxidant Responses of Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) Clones to Damage Stress Caused by The pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams)) - Türkiye

YILMAZ, Ergin; AYAN, Sezgin PRSM 2026. doi:10.34874/imist.prsm/ted-v5i1.66564

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Period significantly affected pine PAL content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine tannin content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine gallic acid content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine catechin content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine rutin trihydrate content.
Observation Larval bag number, period and clone significantly affected pine PPO.
Observation Larval bag number, period, clone and their interaction significantly affected pine cinnamic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine caffeic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine ferulic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine myricetin.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine naringenin.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine PPO increased.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine cinnamic acid increased.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine ferulic acid decreased.
Observation Pine PAL increased from February to August.
Observation Pine tannin increased from February to August.
Observation Pine caffeic acid increased from February to August.
Observation Pine ferulic acid increased from February to August.
Observation Pine rutin trihydrate increased from February to August.

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine ferulic acid.

Taxon: Pinus brutia Ten.Pinus brutiat0
Interactor: Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams)Thaumetopoea wilkinsonit1herbivore
Outcome: ferulic acide0

Verbatim

e0
“Similarly, the period, clone, the numbers of larval bag * clone interaction had a statistically significant effect for caffeic acid and chrysin while the numbers of larval bag and period had a statistically significant effect for ferulic acid, and the period and clone had a statistically significant effect for myricetin and naringenin (P<0.05).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1326

t0
“Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–57

t1
“pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams))”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–152

Title

Antioxidant Responses of Brutian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) Clones to Damage Stress Caused by The pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni (Tams)) - Türkiye

YILMAZ, Ergin; AYAN, Sezgin PRSM 2026. doi:10.34874/imist.prsm/ted-v5i1.66564

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Period significantly affected pine PAL content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine tannin content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine gallic acid content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine catechin content.
Observation Period significantly affected pine rutin trihydrate content.
Observation Larval bag number, period and clone significantly affected pine PPO.
Observation Larval bag number, period, clone and their interaction significantly affected pine cinnamic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine caffeic acid.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine chrysin.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine myricetin.
Observation Period and other listed factors significantly affected pine naringenin.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine PPO increased.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine cinnamic acid increased.
Observation With more larval bags from period I to II, pine ferulic acid decreased.
Observation Pine PAL increased from February to August.
Observation Pine tannin increased from February to August.
Observation Pine caffeic acid increased from February to August.
Observation Pine ferulic acid increased from February to August.
Observation Pine rutin trihydrate increased from February to August.