By interacting organism › Bacteria › Pasteuriaceae

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Paecilomyces lilacinus and Pasteuria penetrans controlled Meloidogyne incognita more effectively than either alone.

Taxon: winter vetche1
Treatment: Paecilomyces lilacinus and Pasteuria penetrans were applied togethere0
Interactor: Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Second interactor: Paecilomyces lilacinus and Pasteuria penetransPurpureocillium lilacinumPasteuria penetranse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome: Meloidogyne incognita was controllede0
Direction: more effectivelye0
Comparator: either was applied alonee0

Verbatim

e0
“The root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita was controlled more effectively and yields of host plants were greater when Paecilomyces lilacinus and Pasteuria penetrans were applied together in field microplots than when either was applied alone.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–245

e1
“Yields of winter vetch from microplots inoculated with the nematode”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–313

Title

Biological Control of Meloidogyne incognita by Paecilomyces lilacinus and Pasteuria penetrans.

B Dube; G C Smart PubMed 1987

Other claims from this paper (2)

Intervention effect Combined biocontrol organisms increased host plant yields compared with either alone.
Intervention effect Winter vetch yield under nematode and combined organism inoculation was not statistically different from uninoculated controls.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined biocontrol organisms increased host plant yields compared with either alone.

Taxon: winter vetche1
Treatment: Paecilomyces lilacinus and Pasteuria penetrans were applied togethere0
Interactor: Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Second interactor: Paecilomyces lilacinus and Pasteuria penetransPurpureocillium lilacinumPasteuria penetranse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome: yields of host plantse0
Direction: greatere0
Comparator: either was applied alonee0

Verbatim

e0
“The root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita was controlled more effectively and yields of host plants were greater when Paecilomyces lilacinus and Pasteuria penetrans were applied together in field microplots than when either was applied alone.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–245

e1
“Yields of winter vetch from microplots inoculated with the nematode”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–313

Title

Biological Control of Meloidogyne incognita by Paecilomyces lilacinus and Pasteuria penetrans.

B Dube; G C Smart PubMed 1987

Other claims from this paper (2)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pasteuria did not influence the morphology of nematode-induced giant cells in host roots.

Taxon: hostse0
Treatment: Pasteuriae0
Interactor: MeloidogyneMeloidogynee0pest
Second interactor: PasteuriaPasteuriae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome: morphology of the giant cells induced by these nematodes in their hosts' rootse0
Direction: did note0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Pasteuria did not invade or inactivate the anterior oesophageal region of the female Meloidogyne or influence the morphology of the giant cells induced by these nematodes in their hosts' roots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–807

Title

The influence of the actionmycete,Pasteuria penetrans, on the host–parasite relationship of the plant-parasitic nematode,Meloidogyne javanica

A. F. Bird Parasitology 1986. doi:10.1017/s0031182000081270

Other claims from this paper (1)

Observation Pasteuria parasitism did not change nematode feeding and stimulation of the plant host.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus penetrans inhibited Meloidogyne incognita juvenile penetration into tomato roots.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment: Bacillus penetranse0
Interactor: Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Second interactor: Bacillus penetransPasteuria penetranse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome: penetration by Meloidogyne incognita second-stage juveniles (J2) into tomato rootse0
Direction: inhibitede0
Setting: laboratory and greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Bacillus penetrans inhibited penetration by Meloidogyne incognita second-stage juveniles (J2) into tomato roots in the laboratory and greenhouse.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145

Title

Root Penetration by Meloidogyne incognita Juveniles Infected with Bacillus Penetrans.

S M Brown; G C Smart PubMed 1985

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observation B. penetrans spores attached to M. javanica juveniles.
Observation B. penetrans spores attached to M. incognita juveniles.
Observation B. penetrans spores attached to M. arenaria juveniles.
Observation More M. javanica juveniles were infected than M. incognita juveniles.
Observation More M. javanica juveniles were infected than M. arenaria juveniles.
Observation More spores attached to M. incognita than to M. arenaria.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. penetrans spores attached to M. javanica juveniles.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
Interactor: M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pest
Second interactor: B. penetransPasteuria penetranse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome: attached to J2 of M. javanicae0
Setting: Floridae0

Verbatim

e0
“Spores from this Florida population of B. penetrans attached to J2 of M. javanica, M. incognita, and M. arenaria.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–259

t0
“Root Penetration by Meloidogyne incognita Juveniles Infected with Bacillus Penetrans.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–85

e1
“tomato roots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–111

Title

Root Penetration by Meloidogyne incognita Juveniles Infected with Bacillus Penetrans.

S M Brown; G C Smart PubMed 1985

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Bacillus penetrans inhibited Meloidogyne incognita juvenile penetration into tomato roots.
Observation B. penetrans spores attached to M. incognita juveniles.
Observation B. penetrans spores attached to M. arenaria juveniles.
Observation More M. javanica juveniles were infected than M. incognita juveniles.
Observation More M. javanica juveniles were infected than M. arenaria juveniles.
Observation More spores attached to M. incognita than to M. arenaria.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. penetrans spores attached to M. incognita juveniles.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
Interactor: M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Second interactor: B. penetransPasteuria penetranse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome: attached to J2 of M. javanica, M. incognitae0

Verbatim

e0
“Spores from this Florida population of B. penetrans attached to J2 of M. javanica, M. incognita, and M. arenaria.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–259

t0
“Root Penetration by Meloidogyne incognita Juveniles Infected with Bacillus Penetrans.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–85

e1
“tomato roots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–111

Title

Root Penetration by Meloidogyne incognita Juveniles Infected with Bacillus Penetrans.

S M Brown; G C Smart PubMed 1985

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Bacillus penetrans inhibited Meloidogyne incognita juvenile penetration into tomato roots.
Observation B. penetrans spores attached to M. javanica juveniles.
Observation B. penetrans spores attached to M. arenaria juveniles.
Observation More M. javanica juveniles were infected than M. incognita juveniles.
Observation More M. javanica juveniles were infected than M. arenaria juveniles.
Observation More spores attached to M. incognita than to M. arenaria.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. penetrans spores attached to M. arenaria juveniles.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
Interactor: M. arenariaMeloidogyne arenariae0pest
Second interactor: B. penetransPasteuria penetranse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome: attached to J2 of M. javanica, M. incognita, and M. arenariae0

Verbatim

e0
“Spores from this Florida population of B. penetrans attached to J2 of M. javanica, M. incognita, and M. arenaria.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–259

t0
“Root Penetration by Meloidogyne incognita Juveniles Infected with Bacillus Penetrans.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–85

e1
“tomato roots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–111

Title

Root Penetration by Meloidogyne incognita Juveniles Infected with Bacillus Penetrans.

S M Brown; G C Smart PubMed 1985

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Bacillus penetrans inhibited Meloidogyne incognita juvenile penetration into tomato roots.
Observation B. penetrans spores attached to M. javanica juveniles.
Observation B. penetrans spores attached to M. incognita juveniles.
Observation More M. javanica juveniles were infected than M. incognita juveniles.
Observation More M. javanica juveniles were infected than M. arenaria juveniles.
Observation More spores attached to M. incognita than to M. arenaria.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infected female Meloidogyne were found in 34 % of 73 sugarcane fields in South Africa.

Taxon: sugarcanet0
Interactor: MeloidogyneMeloidogynet0pest
Second interactor: Bacillus penetransPasteuria penetranst0biocontrol_agent
Outcome: Infected female Meloidogynee1
Value: 34 %e1
Setting: South Africat0

Verbatim

e1
“Infected female Meloidogyne were found in 34 % of 73 fields”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–224

t0
“Observations on Bacillus penetrans infecting Meloidogyne in sugarcane fields in South Africa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92

Title

Observations on Bacillus penetrans infecting Meloidogyne in sugarcane fields in South Africa

Vaughan W. Spaull http://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/exl-doc/pleins_textes/pleins_textes_5/pt5/nemato/17437.pdf 1984

Other claims from this paper (7)

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The level of Meloidogyne parasitism by B. penetrans was greater at higher densities of the host in sugarcane fields.

Taxon: sugarcanet0
Treatment: higher densities of the hoste5
Interactor: MeloidogyneMeloidogynet0pest
Second interactor: Bacillus penetransPasteuria penetranst0biocontrol_agent
Outcome: level of parasitisme5
Direction: greatere5

Verbatim

e5
“the level of parasitism was greater at higher densities of the host”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–598

t0
“Observations on Bacillus penetrans infecting Meloidogyne in sugarcane fields in South Africa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92

Title

Observations on Bacillus penetrans infecting Meloidogyne in sugarcane fields in South Africa

Vaughan W. Spaull http://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/exl-doc/pleins_textes/pleins_textes_5/pt5/nemato/17437.pdf 1984

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spores of B. penetrans derived from M. javanica infected a much larger proportion of M. javanica larvae than larvae of M. incognita.

Taxon: sugarcanet0
Treatment: spores derived from M. jauanicae6
Interactor: M. jauanicae6pest
Second interactor: B. penetransPasteuria penetranse6biocontrol_agent
Outcome: proportion of the larvaee6
Direction: much largere6
Comparator: larvae of M. incognitae6

Verbatim

e6
“B. penetrans spores derived from M. jauanica infected a much larger proportion of the larvae of this species than larvae of M. incognita”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–736

t0
“Observations on Bacillus penetrans infecting Meloidogyne in sugarcane fields in South Africa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92

Title

Observations on Bacillus penetrans infecting Meloidogyne in sugarcane fields in South Africa

Vaughan W. Spaull http://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/exl-doc/pleins_textes/pleins_textes_5/pt5/nemato/17437.pdf 1984

Other claims from this paper (7)

Pasteuriaceae 411 claims

411 claims