By interacting organism › Plants › Schisandraceae

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. arguta leaf proline reached 19.44 ± 0.91 mg/g dry weight at S. chinensis:A. arguta 2:1.

Taxon: A. argutaActinidia argutae0
Organ / stage: leavese0
Interactor: S. chinensisSchisandra chinensise0other
Outcome: proline contente0
Direction: maximume0
Value: 19.44 ± 0.91 mg/g of dry weight (DW)e0

Verbatim

e0
“The maximum proline content, 19.44 ± 0.91 mg/g of dry weight (DW), was observed in the leaves of A. arguta in the experiment combination with a prevailing number of schisandra plants at a ratio of S. chinensis and A. arguta plants of 2:1.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1123

Title

Diagnostic significance of the synthesis of phenolic compounds and proline in the leaves of Schisandra chinensis and Actinidia arguta for the indication of the stress levels of plants under conditions of mixed plantings

Tetyana Venediktova; Natalia Zaimenko; Nadiia Skrypchenko Plant Introduction 2022. doi:10.46341/pi2021016

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Mixed planting increased leaf proline over monoculture.
Intervention effect Mixed planting increased leaf phenolic substances over monoculture.
Observation Actinidia leaf phenolic compounds peaked at 36.87 ± 2.22 mg/g DW in that combination.
Intervention effect Root exudates reduced A. arguta root growth 12.0 % versus control.
Intervention effect Root exudates reduced S. chinensis root growth 30.0 % versus control.
Mechanism Schisandra allelochemicals were interpreted to inhibit actinidia development.
Recommendation An A. arguta:S. chinensis ratio of 2 : 1 was recommended as optimal.
Association Greater schisandra concentration was associated with more actinidia stress and leaf phenols and prolines.
Method / resource Leaf proline and phenolic compound comparison was proposed as an indicator of mixed planting stress.

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Schisandra allelochemicals were interpreted to inhibit actinidia development.

Taxon: actinidiaActinidiae0
Interactor: schisandraSchisandrae0other
Compound: allelochemicalse0
Outcome: developmente0

Verbatim

e0
“the high activity of schisandra’s allelochemicals, which negatively affect the development of actinidia plants.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1578–1689

Title

Diagnostic significance of the synthesis of phenolic compounds and proline in the leaves of Schisandra chinensis and Actinidia arguta for the indication of the stress levels of plants under conditions of mixed plantings

Tetyana Venediktova; Natalia Zaimenko; Nadiia Skrypchenko Plant Introduction 2022. doi:10.46341/pi2021016

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Mixed planting increased leaf proline over monoculture.
Intervention effect Mixed planting increased leaf phenolic substances over monoculture.
Observation A. arguta leaf proline reached 19.44 ± 0.91 mg/g dry weight at S. chinensis:A. arguta 2:1.
Observation Actinidia leaf phenolic compounds peaked at 36.87 ± 2.22 mg/g DW in that combination.
Intervention effect Root exudates reduced A. arguta root growth 12.0 % versus control.
Intervention effect Root exudates reduced S. chinensis root growth 30.0 % versus control.
Recommendation An A. arguta:S. chinensis ratio of 2 : 1 was recommended as optimal.
Association Greater schisandra concentration was associated with more actinidia stress and leaf phenols and prolines.
Method / resource Leaf proline and phenolic compound comparison was proposed as an indicator of mixed planting stress.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

An A. arguta:S. chinensis ratio of 2 : 1 was recommended as optimal.

Taxon: A. argutaActinidia argutae0
Interactor: S. chinensisSchisandra chinensise0other
Outcome: optimal ratioe0
Value: 2 : 1e0

Verbatim

e0
“The optimal ratio of plants A. arguta and S. chinensis when grown together is 2 : 1”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1773

Title

Diagnostic significance of the synthesis of phenolic compounds and proline in the leaves of Schisandra chinensis and Actinidia arguta for the indication of the stress levels of plants under conditions of mixed plantings

Tetyana Venediktova; Natalia Zaimenko; Nadiia Skrypchenko Plant Introduction 2022. doi:10.46341/pi2021016

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Mixed planting increased leaf proline over monoculture.
Intervention effect Mixed planting increased leaf phenolic substances over monoculture.
Observation A. arguta leaf proline reached 19.44 ± 0.91 mg/g dry weight at S. chinensis:A. arguta 2:1.
Observation Actinidia leaf phenolic compounds peaked at 36.87 ± 2.22 mg/g DW in that combination.
Intervention effect Root exudates reduced A. arguta root growth 12.0 % versus control.
Intervention effect Root exudates reduced S. chinensis root growth 30.0 % versus control.
Mechanism Schisandra allelochemicals were interpreted to inhibit actinidia development.
Association Greater schisandra concentration was associated with more actinidia stress and leaf phenols and prolines.
Method / resource Leaf proline and phenolic compound comparison was proposed as an indicator of mixed planting stress.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater schisandra concentration was associated with more actinidia stress and leaf phenols and prolines.

Taxon: actinidiaActinidiae0
Interactor: schisandraSchisandrae0other
Outcome: stress in actinidia plantse0
Direction: moree0
Qualifier: increased accumulation of phenols and prolinese0

Verbatim

e0
“a higher concentration of schisandra plants in a container more stress in actinidia plants, expressed as an increased accumulation of phenols and prolines in its leaves.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–1950

Title

Diagnostic significance of the synthesis of phenolic compounds and proline in the leaves of Schisandra chinensis and Actinidia arguta for the indication of the stress levels of plants under conditions of mixed plantings

Tetyana Venediktova; Natalia Zaimenko; Nadiia Skrypchenko Plant Introduction 2022. doi:10.46341/pi2021016

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Mixed planting increased leaf proline over monoculture.
Intervention effect Mixed planting increased leaf phenolic substances over monoculture.
Observation A. arguta leaf proline reached 19.44 ± 0.91 mg/g dry weight at S. chinensis:A. arguta 2:1.
Observation Actinidia leaf phenolic compounds peaked at 36.87 ± 2.22 mg/g DW in that combination.
Intervention effect Root exudates reduced A. arguta root growth 12.0 % versus control.
Intervention effect Root exudates reduced S. chinensis root growth 30.0 % versus control.
Mechanism Schisandra allelochemicals were interpreted to inhibit actinidia development.
Recommendation An A. arguta:S. chinensis ratio of 2 : 1 was recommended as optimal.
Method / resource Leaf proline and phenolic compound comparison was proposed as an indicator of mixed planting stress.

Schisandraceae 4 claims

4 claims