Araceae 163 claims

family · order Alismatales · 25 taxa · NCBI Taxonomy ↗

25 entries

Lemna minor37 claims · 21 papers Lemnaduckweed · also duckweeds30 claims · 12 papers Colocasia esculentataro · also cocoyam27 claims · 9 papers Pistia stratioteswater lettuce · also water lettuces20 claims · 9 papers Pistia9 claims · 1 paper Lemna aequinoctialisalso Lemna paucicostata · also L. paucicostata6 claims · 5 papers Alocasia3 claims · 1 paper Amorphophallus konjackonjac3 claims · 1 paper Anthurium3 claims · 1 paper Epipremnum giganteum3 claims · 1 paper Landoltia punctataalso S. punctata3 claims · 2 papers Philodendron meridionale3 claims · 1 paper Spirodela polyrhizagreater duckweed3 claims · 3 papers Wolffia arrhiza3 claims · 1 paper Lemna perpusilla2 claims · 2 papers Amorphophallus paeoniifolius var. campanulatusalso Amorphophallus campanulatus1 claim · 1 paper Anthurium andraeanumoilcloth-flower1 claim · 1 paper Araceaearum family1 claim · 1 paper Cercestis1 claim · 1 paper Homalomena cordata1 claim · 1 paper Lemna gibbaswollen duckweed1 claim · 1 paper Lemna turionifera1 claim · 1 paper Peltandra virginicaarrow arum1 claim · 1 paper Syngonium podophyllum1 claim · 1 paper Zantedeschia aethiopicacalla lily · also Calla lily latent virus1 claim · 1 paper

163 claims

Open in search (filters, sorting) →

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azolla had stronger stoichiometric homeostasis and conservative growth.

Taxon: AzollaAzollae0
Interactor: LemnaLemnat0other
Outcome: stronger stoichiometric homeostasis and a more conservative growth profilee0

Verbatim

e0
“Azolla exhibited stronger stoichiometric homeostasis and a more conservative growth profile”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–528

t0
“Azolla and Lemna”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–107

Title

Root Plasticity and Elemental Stoichiometry Are Associated with Competitive Shifts Between Azolla and Lemna Under Different Nitrogen Levels

Si Liu; Xiaoyue Liang; Yingcan Chen; et al. Plants 2026. doi:10.3390/plants15121853

Other claims from this paper (8)

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azolla retained a competitive advantage under limited nitrogen.

Taxon: AzollaAzollae0
Treatment: N-limiting conditionse0
Interactor: LemnaLemnat0other
Outcome: competitive advantagee0
Direction: advantagee0

Verbatim

e0
“Azolla exhibited stronger stoichiometric homeostasis and a more conservative growth profile, retaining a competitive advantage under N-limiting conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–591

t0
“Azolla and Lemna”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–107

Title

Root Plasticity and Elemental Stoichiometry Are Associated with Competitive Shifts Between Azolla and Lemna Under Different Nitrogen Levels

Si Liu; Xiaoyue Liang; Yingcan Chen; et al. Plants 2026. doi:10.3390/plants15121853

Other claims from this paper (8)

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root traits and stoichiometric flexibility were associated with the shift in competitive balance.

Taxon: Azolla and LemnaLemnaAzollat0
Organ / stage: root traitse0
Interactor: Azolla and LemnaLemnaAzollat0other
Outcome: shift in competitive balancee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“This nitrogen-driven shift in competitive balance was associated with differences in root traits and stoichiometric flexibility”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–903

t0
“Azolla and Lemna”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–107

Title

Root Plasticity and Elemental Stoichiometry Are Associated with Competitive Shifts Between Azolla and Lemna Under Different Nitrogen Levels

Si Liu; Xiaoyue Liang; Yingcan Chen; et al. Plants 2026. doi:10.3390/plants15121853

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observation Azolla had stronger stoichiometric homeostasis and conservative growth.
Association Azolla retained a competitive advantage under limited nitrogen.
Association Lemna gained a competitive advantage in nitrogen rich environments.
Observation Lemna showed greater morphological plasticity and luxury nutrient uptake.
Observation Lemna had greater flexibility in nutrient balance and higher phosphorus accumulation under nitrogen rich conditions.
Association Trait expression differed between experimental periods.
Recommendation The authors suggest low nitrogen inputs to maintain Azolla dominated communities.
Recommendation The authors suggest high nitrogen may favor Lemna and rapid nutrient uptake.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carfentrazone-ethyl suppressed Pistia with 80 % drying or bleaching by 6 DASP.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: carfentrazone-ethyle0
Interactor: PistiaPistiae0weed
Outcome: Pistiae0
Direction: suppressinge0
Value: 80 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“carfentrazone-ethyl, glufosinate ammonium and a combination of carfentrazone-ethyl with chlorimuron + metsulfuron were effective in suppressing Pistia with 80 % drying or bleaching by 6 DASP”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1170

t0
“rice ecosystem”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–56

Title

Management of Pistia stratiotes L. in the rice ecosystem

T Deepa; P Prameela; J Nimmy; et al. Plant Science Today 2026. doi:10.14719/pst.13517

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Glufosinate ammonium suppressed Pistia with 80 % drying or bleaching by 6 DASP.
Intervention effect The carfentrazone-ethyl combination with chlorimuron and metsulfuron suppressed Pistia with 80 % drying or bleaching by 6 DASP.
Observation No Pistia regrowth was observed by 20 DASP in the effective herbicide treated pots.
Intervention effect Acetic acid produced complete Pistia bleaching on the application day.
Intervention effect Sodium chloride did not suppress Pistia growth effectively.
Intervention effect Lime did not suppress Pistia growth effectively.
Intervention effect Gypsum did not suppress Pistia growth effectively.
Intervention effect Acetic acid caused significant injury to rice.
Intervention effect Glufosinate ammonium caused significant injury to rice.
Intervention effect Carfentrazone-ethyl controlled Pistia without adverse effects on rice.
Intervention effect Carfentrazone-ethyl had no adverse effects on rice.
Recommendation The authors identify carfentrazone-ethyl at 0.02 kg ha-1 as a selective option to manage Pistia in lowland rice.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glufosinate ammonium suppressed Pistia with 80 % drying or bleaching by 6 DASP.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: glufosinate ammoniume0
Interactor: PistiaPistiae0weed
Outcome: Pistiae0
Direction: suppressinge0
Value: 80 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“carfentrazone-ethyl, glufosinate ammonium and a combination of carfentrazone-ethyl with chlorimuron + metsulfuron were effective in suppressing Pistia with 80 % drying or bleaching by 6 DASP”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1170

t0
“rice ecosystem”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–56

Title

Management of Pistia stratiotes L. in the rice ecosystem

T Deepa; P Prameela; J Nimmy; et al. Plant Science Today 2026. doi:10.14719/pst.13517

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Carfentrazone-ethyl suppressed Pistia with 80 % drying or bleaching by 6 DASP.
Intervention effect The carfentrazone-ethyl combination with chlorimuron and metsulfuron suppressed Pistia with 80 % drying or bleaching by 6 DASP.
Observation No Pistia regrowth was observed by 20 DASP in the effective herbicide treated pots.
Intervention effect Acetic acid produced complete Pistia bleaching on the application day.
Intervention effect Sodium chloride did not suppress Pistia growth effectively.
Intervention effect Lime did not suppress Pistia growth effectively.
Intervention effect Gypsum did not suppress Pistia growth effectively.
Intervention effect Acetic acid caused significant injury to rice.
Intervention effect Glufosinate ammonium caused significant injury to rice.
Intervention effect Carfentrazone-ethyl controlled Pistia without adverse effects on rice.
Intervention effect Carfentrazone-ethyl had no adverse effects on rice.
Recommendation The authors identify carfentrazone-ethyl at 0.02 kg ha-1 as a selective option to manage Pistia in lowland rice.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The carfentrazone-ethyl combination with chlorimuron and metsulfuron suppressed Pistia with 80 % drying or bleaching by 6 DASP.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: a combination of carfentrazone-ethyl with chlorimuron + metsulfurone0
Interactor: PistiaPistiae0weed
Outcome: Pistiae0
Direction: suppressinge0
Value: 80 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“a combination of carfentrazone-ethyl with chlorimuron + metsulfuron were effective in suppressing Pistia with 80 % drying or bleaching by 6 DASP”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1170

t0
“rice ecosystem”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–56

Title

Management of Pistia stratiotes L. in the rice ecosystem

T Deepa; P Prameela; J Nimmy; et al. Plant Science Today 2026. doi:10.14719/pst.13517

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Carfentrazone-ethyl suppressed Pistia with 80 % drying or bleaching by 6 DASP.
Intervention effect Glufosinate ammonium suppressed Pistia with 80 % drying or bleaching by 6 DASP.
Observation No Pistia regrowth was observed by 20 DASP in the effective herbicide treated pots.
Intervention effect Acetic acid produced complete Pistia bleaching on the application day.
Intervention effect Sodium chloride did not suppress Pistia growth effectively.
Intervention effect Lime did not suppress Pistia growth effectively.
Intervention effect Gypsum did not suppress Pistia growth effectively.
Intervention effect Acetic acid caused significant injury to rice.
Intervention effect Glufosinate ammonium caused significant injury to rice.
Intervention effect Carfentrazone-ethyl controlled Pistia without adverse effects on rice.
Intervention effect Carfentrazone-ethyl had no adverse effects on rice.
Recommendation The authors identify carfentrazone-ethyl at 0.02 kg ha-1 as a selective option to manage Pistia in lowland rice.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No Pistia regrowth was observed by 20 DASP in the effective herbicide treated pots.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Interactor: PistiaPistiae0weed
Outcome: No regrowth of Pistiae0
Qualifier: by 20 DASPe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“No regrowth of Pistia was observed by 20 DASP in these herbicides treated pots”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1250

t0
“rice ecosystem”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–56

Title

Management of Pistia stratiotes L. in the rice ecosystem

T Deepa; P Prameela; J Nimmy; et al. Plant Science Today 2026. doi:10.14719/pst.13517

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Carfentrazone-ethyl suppressed Pistia with 80 % drying or bleaching by 6 DASP.
Intervention effect Glufosinate ammonium suppressed Pistia with 80 % drying or bleaching by 6 DASP.
Intervention effect The carfentrazone-ethyl combination with chlorimuron and metsulfuron suppressed Pistia with 80 % drying or bleaching by 6 DASP.
Intervention effect Acetic acid produced complete Pistia bleaching on the application day.
Intervention effect Sodium chloride did not suppress Pistia growth effectively.
Intervention effect Lime did not suppress Pistia growth effectively.
Intervention effect Gypsum did not suppress Pistia growth effectively.
Intervention effect Acetic acid caused significant injury to rice.
Intervention effect Glufosinate ammonium caused significant injury to rice.
Intervention effect Carfentrazone-ethyl controlled Pistia without adverse effects on rice.
Intervention effect Carfentrazone-ethyl had no adverse effects on rice.
Recommendation The authors identify carfentrazone-ethyl at 0.02 kg ha-1 as a selective option to manage Pistia in lowland rice.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetic acid produced complete Pistia bleaching on the application day.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: Acetic acide0
Interactor: Pistia stratiotes L.Pistia stratiotest0weed
Outcome: complete bleachinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Acetic acid induced rapid phytotoxicity, resulting in complete bleaching on the day of application”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1350

t0
“Pistia stratiotes L. in the rice ecosystem”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–56

Title

Management of Pistia stratiotes L. in the rice ecosystem

T Deepa; P Prameela; J Nimmy; et al. Plant Science Today 2026. doi:10.14719/pst.13517

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Carfentrazone-ethyl suppressed Pistia with 80 % drying or bleaching by 6 DASP.
Intervention effect Glufosinate ammonium suppressed Pistia with 80 % drying or bleaching by 6 DASP.
Intervention effect The carfentrazone-ethyl combination with chlorimuron and metsulfuron suppressed Pistia with 80 % drying or bleaching by 6 DASP.
Observation No Pistia regrowth was observed by 20 DASP in the effective herbicide treated pots.
Intervention effect Sodium chloride did not suppress Pistia growth effectively.
Intervention effect Lime did not suppress Pistia growth effectively.
Intervention effect Gypsum did not suppress Pistia growth effectively.
Intervention effect Acetic acid caused significant injury to rice.
Intervention effect Glufosinate ammonium caused significant injury to rice.
Intervention effect Carfentrazone-ethyl controlled Pistia without adverse effects on rice.
Intervention effect Carfentrazone-ethyl had no adverse effects on rice.
Recommendation The authors identify carfentrazone-ethyl at 0.02 kg ha-1 as a selective option to manage Pistia in lowland rice.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium chloride did not suppress Pistia growth effectively.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: sodium chloridee0
Interactor: PistiaPistiae0weed
Outcome: growth of Pistiae0
Direction: ineffectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“sodium chloride, lime and gypsum were ineffective in suppressing growth of Pistia”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1442

t0
“rice ecosystem”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–56

Title

Management of Pistia stratiotes L. in the rice ecosystem

T Deepa; P Prameela; J Nimmy; et al. Plant Science Today 2026. doi:10.14719/pst.13517

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Carfentrazone-ethyl suppressed Pistia with 80 % drying or bleaching by 6 DASP.
Intervention effect Glufosinate ammonium suppressed Pistia with 80 % drying or bleaching by 6 DASP.
Intervention effect The carfentrazone-ethyl combination with chlorimuron and metsulfuron suppressed Pistia with 80 % drying or bleaching by 6 DASP.
Observation No Pistia regrowth was observed by 20 DASP in the effective herbicide treated pots.
Intervention effect Acetic acid produced complete Pistia bleaching on the application day.
Intervention effect Lime did not suppress Pistia growth effectively.
Intervention effect Gypsum did not suppress Pistia growth effectively.
Intervention effect Acetic acid caused significant injury to rice.
Intervention effect Glufosinate ammonium caused significant injury to rice.
Intervention effect Carfentrazone-ethyl controlled Pistia without adverse effects on rice.
Intervention effect Carfentrazone-ethyl had no adverse effects on rice.
Recommendation The authors identify carfentrazone-ethyl at 0.02 kg ha-1 as a selective option to manage Pistia in lowland rice.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime did not suppress Pistia growth effectively.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: limee0
Interactor: PistiaPistiae0weed
Outcome: growth of Pistiae0
Direction: ineffectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“sodium chloride, lime and gypsum were ineffective in suppressing growth of Pistia”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1442

t0
“rice ecosystem”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–56

Title

Management of Pistia stratiotes L. in the rice ecosystem

T Deepa; P Prameela; J Nimmy; et al. Plant Science Today 2026. doi:10.14719/pst.13517

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Carfentrazone-ethyl suppressed Pistia with 80 % drying or bleaching by 6 DASP.
Intervention effect Glufosinate ammonium suppressed Pistia with 80 % drying or bleaching by 6 DASP.
Intervention effect The carfentrazone-ethyl combination with chlorimuron and metsulfuron suppressed Pistia with 80 % drying or bleaching by 6 DASP.
Observation No Pistia regrowth was observed by 20 DASP in the effective herbicide treated pots.
Intervention effect Acetic acid produced complete Pistia bleaching on the application day.
Intervention effect Sodium chloride did not suppress Pistia growth effectively.
Intervention effect Gypsum did not suppress Pistia growth effectively.
Intervention effect Acetic acid caused significant injury to rice.
Intervention effect Glufosinate ammonium caused significant injury to rice.
Intervention effect Carfentrazone-ethyl controlled Pistia without adverse effects on rice.
Intervention effect Carfentrazone-ethyl had no adverse effects on rice.
Recommendation The authors identify carfentrazone-ethyl at 0.02 kg ha-1 as a selective option to manage Pistia in lowland rice.