Claim · model-written summary
Plant growth, chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b of tomato were similarly affected by the symbiotic treatments under drought.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume4 - Treatment
- symbiotic (An) plantse2
- Interactor
- Curvularia protuberataCurvularia protuberatae3symbiont
- Second interactor
- CThTVCurvularia orthocurvulavirus 1e3symbiont
- Outcome
- Plant growth, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll be5
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede5
- Comparator
- non-symbiotic (NS), virus-free (VF)e2
- Setting
- greenhouse experimente1
Verbatim
e1“in this greenhouse experiment”
e2“The treatments included non-symbiotic (NS), virus-free (VF), and symbiotic (An) plants”
e3“fungus (Curvularia protuberata), virus (CThTV)”
e4“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”
e5“Plant growth, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, photosynthetic rate, stomata conductance, water potential, and soluble sugar content were similarly affected by the various treatments”
Title
Safaa Al-Hamdani; Austen Stoelting; Mustafa Morsy American Journal of Plant Sciences 2015. doi:10.4236/ajps.2015.610163
Other claims from this paper (4)
- Intervention effect Photosynthetic rate, stomata conductance and water potential of tomato were similarly affected by the symbiotic treatments under drought.
- Intervention effect Soluble sugar content of tomato was similarly affected by the symbiotic treatments under drought.
- Intervention effect Carotenoids were significantly higher at pre-anthesis in symbiotic tomato plants than in other treatments.
- Association Photosynthesis was higher at anthesis than at pre-anthesis for all tomato treatments.