Literal values, not normalised. 183,098 distinct spellings cover 1,706,259 claims; only letter case and spacing are merged, so “maize”, “corn” and “Zea mays L.” are three separate entries here. The By interacting organism view merges spellings of one organism through NCBI Taxonomy.
Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Savoy cabbage Alcosa had the lowest infestation by all forms of A. proletella .
Outcomeinfestation by all forms of A. proletella e0 Verbatim
e0 “The lowest infestation by all forms of A. proletella was observed on savoy cabbage cultivar “Alcosa” and kale cultivar “Starbor” ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–927 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Kale Starbor had the lowest infestation by all forms of A. proletella .
Outcomeinfestation by all forms of A. proletella e0 Verbatim
e0 “The lowest infestation by all forms of A. proletella was observed on savoy cabbage cultivar “Alcosa” and kale cultivar “Starbor” ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–927 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The authors identified promising resistance sources to A. proletella among savoy cabbage and kale cultivars.
Taxonsavoy cabbage and kale e0 Outcomepromising sources of resistance to A. proletella e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “This study identified promising sources of resistance to A. proletella among cultivars of savoy cabbage and kale ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1572 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Both banker plants increased A. proletella parasitism rates 1.5 fold.
Treatmentboth banker plants e0 OutcomeA. proletella parasitism ratese0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “both banker plants led to an 1.5‐fold increase in A. proletella parasitism rates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–691 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Only the pumpkin system reduced A. proletella populations by 4.4%–25.8%.
Treatmentpumpkin system e0 OutcomeA. proletella populationse0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “only the pumpkin system increased the abundance of syrphid larvae on cabbage by 61.5% and reduced A. proletella populations on average by 4.4%–25.8% depending on the respective assessment date ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–894 Other claims from this paper (4) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors considered the pumpkin system a promising supplementary control against A. proletella .
Outcomepromising (supplementary) control measure e0 Verbatim
e0 “the pumpkin system revealed to be a promising (supplementary) control measure against A. proletella ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1010 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The resistance trait affects whitefly probing behaviour at the phloem level.
Outcomeprobing behaviour e4 Qualifierat the phloem level e4 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “is becoming a serious pest in Brassica oleracea L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–132 e4 “Analysis of probing behaviour revealed that the resistance trait affects A. proletella at the phloem level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1252 Other claims from this paper (5)