By interacting organism as written › I. hederacea

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Below-ground competition from I. hederacea acted as a selection agent on root traits of I. purpurea.

Taxon: I. purpureaIpomoea purpureae1
Interactor: I. hederaceaIpomoea hederaceae2other
Outcome: selection on these traitse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“below-ground competition acts as an agent of selection on these traits”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–827

e1
“I. purpurea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–508

e2
“I. hederacea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–570

Title

Below‐ground competition favors character convergence but not character displacement in root traits

Sara M. Colom; Regina S. Baucom New Phytologist 2020. doi:10.1111/nph.17100

Other claims from this paper (2)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Competition was associated with convergence rather than displacement in root architecture of I. purpurea.

Taxon: I. purpureaIpomoea purpureae1
Interactor: I. hederaceaIpomoea hederaceae2other
Outcome: character convergence on our measure of root architecture rather than displacemente0

Verbatim

e0
“showed evidence of character convergence on our measure of root architecture rather than displacement”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–975

e1
“I. purpurea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–508

e2
“I. hederacea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–570

Title

Below‐ground competition favors character convergence but not character displacement in root traits

Sara M. Colom; Regina S. Baucom New Phytologist 2020. doi:10.1111/nph.17100

Other claims from this paper (2)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfentrazone treatments controlled I. hederacea above 80% in 1998.

Taxon: Glycine maxGlycine maxt0
Treatment: sulfentrazone-based treatmentse0
Interactor: I. hederaceaIpomoea hederaceae0weed
Outcome: control of I. hederaceae0
Direction: greater thane0
Value: 80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“All sulfentrazone-based treatments provided greater than 80% control of I. hederacea in 1998”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1216

t0
“Glycine max”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–85

Title

Use of preplant sulfentrazone in no-till, narrow-row, glyphosate-resistantGlycine max

Jeremy T. Dirks; William G. Johnson; Reid J. Smeda; et al. Weed Science 2000. doi:10.1614/0043-1745(2000)048[0628:uopsin]2.0.co;2

Other claims from this paper (18)

Observation No significant soybean crop injury was observed.
Intervention effect Early preplant sulfentrazone generally controlled Setaria faberi more than application at planting.
Intervention effect Early preplant sulfentrazone generally controlled Polygonum pensylvanicum more than application at planting.
Intervention effect At planting, glyphosate plus sulfentrazone controlled S. faberi more than sulfentrazone alone.
Observation Control of three weeds was greater in 1998 than 1999 with more timely precipitation.
Intervention effect Sulfentrazone programs controlled A. rudis by 80 to 100% in 1998.
Observation A. rudis control in 1999 ranged from 72 to 95% at Columbia.
Observation A. rudis control in 1999 ranged from 46 to 83% at Novelty.
Intervention effect Cloransulam alone was the only treatment above 80% A. artemisiifolia control in every site-year.
Observation I. hederacea control was lower in 1999, ranging from 54 to 91%.
Intervention effect Sulfentrazone alone controlled Xanthium strumarium from 5 to 94%.
Intervention effect Adding cloransulam or chlorimuron controlled X. strumarium by 75 to 99%.
Intervention effect After blanket glyphosate, sulfentrazone programs controlled weeds above 79%.
Intervention effect Sulfentrazone combinations with glyphosate generally provided the greatest weed control.
Intervention effect Residual herbicides generally improved weed control over glyphosate alone.
Intervention effect Yield and net returns were not always greater with residual herbicides.
Intervention effect At 30 C, sulfentrazone applied 20 days before planting injured three crops less than at planting.
Intervention effect At 5 C, sulfentrazone timing produced equivalent injury in all indicator species.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I. hederacea control was lower in 1999, ranging from 54 to 91%.

Taxon: Glycine maxGlycine maxt0
Interactor: I. hederaceaIpomoea hederaceae1weed
Outcome: controle0
Direction: lesse0
Value: 54 to 91%e0

Verbatim

e0
“control was less in 1999 and ranged from 54 to 91%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1272

e1
“I. hederacea in 1998”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1216

t0
“Glycine max”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–85

Title

Use of preplant sulfentrazone in no-till, narrow-row, glyphosate-resistantGlycine max

Jeremy T. Dirks; William G. Johnson; Reid J. Smeda; et al. Weed Science 2000. doi:10.1614/0043-1745(2000)048[0628:uopsin]2.0.co;2

Other claims from this paper (18)

Observation No significant soybean crop injury was observed.
Intervention effect Early preplant sulfentrazone generally controlled Setaria faberi more than application at planting.
Intervention effect Early preplant sulfentrazone generally controlled Polygonum pensylvanicum more than application at planting.
Intervention effect At planting, glyphosate plus sulfentrazone controlled S. faberi more than sulfentrazone alone.
Observation Control of three weeds was greater in 1998 than 1999 with more timely precipitation.
Intervention effect Sulfentrazone programs controlled A. rudis by 80 to 100% in 1998.
Observation A. rudis control in 1999 ranged from 72 to 95% at Columbia.
Observation A. rudis control in 1999 ranged from 46 to 83% at Novelty.
Intervention effect Cloransulam alone was the only treatment above 80% A. artemisiifolia control in every site-year.
Intervention effect Sulfentrazone treatments controlled I. hederacea above 80% in 1998.
Intervention effect Sulfentrazone alone controlled Xanthium strumarium from 5 to 94%.
Intervention effect Adding cloransulam or chlorimuron controlled X. strumarium by 75 to 99%.
Intervention effect After blanket glyphosate, sulfentrazone programs controlled weeds above 79%.
Intervention effect Sulfentrazone combinations with glyphosate generally provided the greatest weed control.
Intervention effect Residual herbicides generally improved weed control over glyphosate alone.
Intervention effect Yield and net returns were not always greater with residual herbicides.
Intervention effect At 30 C, sulfentrazone applied 20 days before planting injured three crops less than at planting.
Intervention effect At 5 C, sulfentrazone timing produced equivalent injury in all indicator species.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metolachlor plus flumioxazin preemergence controlled ivyleaf morningglory (I. hederacea) better than metolachlor plus norflurazon preemergence.

Taxon: Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment: Metolachlor plus flumioxazin PRE at 0.07 or 0.11 kg ai/ hae1
Interactor: I. hederaceaIpomoea hederaceae4weed
Outcome: controle1
Direction: bettere2
Comparator: metolachlor plus norflurazon PRE at 1.34 kg ai/hae2

Verbatim

t0
“Weed Management in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–44

e1
“Metolachlor plus flumioxazin PRE at 0.07 or 0.11 kg ai/ ha controlled common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–523

e2
“better than metolachlor plus norflurazon PRE at 1.34 kg ai/ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–734

e4
“ivyleaf (I. hederacea)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–600

Title

Weed Management in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with Flumioxazin Preemergencel

Shawn D. Askew; John W. Wilcut; John R. Cranmer 1999

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethalfluralin plus diclosulam controlled ivyleaf morningglory at least as well as commercial standards.

Taxon: peanutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment: Ethalfluralin plus diclosulame0
Interactor: I. hederaceaIpomoea hederaceae0weed
Outcome: ivyleaf morningglorye0
Direction: bettere0
Comparator: imazapic POSTe0

Verbatim

e0
“Ethalfluralin plus diclosulam controlled entireleaf morningglory ( Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula ), ivyleaf morningglory ( I. hederacea ), pitted morningglory ( I. lacunosa ), common lambsquarters ( Chenopodium album ), eclipta ( Eclipta prostrata ), and prickly sida ( Sida spinosa ) as well as and frequently better than ethalfluralin PPI followed by (fb) acifluorfen plus bentazon postemergence (POST), paraqua…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–856

t0
“Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–37

Title

Response of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) and Selected Weeds to Diclosulam

William A. Bailey; John W. Wilcut; David L. Jordan; et al. Weed Technology 1999. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00042214

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Ethalfluralin plus diclosulam controlled entireleaf morningglory at least as well as commercial standards.
Intervention effect Ethalfluralin plus diclosulam controlled pitted morningglory at least as well as commercial standards.
Intervention effect Ethalfluralin plus diclosulam controlled common lambsquarters at least as well as commercial standards.
Intervention effect Ethalfluralin plus diclosulam controlled eclipta at least as well as commercial standards.
Intervention effect Ethalfluralin plus diclosulam controlled prickly sida at least as well as commercial standards.
Intervention effect A diclosulam system controlled a broader weed spectrum than comparison systems.
Intervention effect A diclosulam system yielded greater than comparison systems.
Observation Peanut showed excellent tolerance to diclosulam PPI at 17 g/ha.
Observation Peanut showed excellent tolerance to diclosulam PPI at 26 g/ha.
Observation Peanut showed excellent tolerance to diclosulam PPI at 35 g/ha.

I. hederacea 6 claims

6 claims