By claim type › Recommendation

Recommendationobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

autumn sowing was more suitable for Aydın, Tekirdağ, Tokat and Şanlıurfa locations.

Taxon: mustardt0
Outcome: autumn sowinge0

Verbatim

e0
“autumn sowing was more suitable for Aydın, Tekirdağ, Tokat and Şanlıurfa locations.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1167

t0
“mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.)”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 90–119

Title

Effect of Row Spacing on Yield, Yield Components and Crude Oil of Autumn and Spring Sowed Mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) in Eight Locations of Turkey

Kayaçetin, Fatma; Central Research Institute for Field Crops, Ankara, TURKEY; Önemli, Fadul; Namik Kemal University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, Tekirdağ, TURKEY; Yılmaz, Güngör; Gaziosmanpasa University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, Tokat, TURKEY; et al. DergiPark (Istanbul University)

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Sowing season and row spacing significantly affected yield, yield components and crude oil yield across locations.
Intervention effect Increasing row spacing reduced mustard seed yield.
Intervention effect Increasing row spacing reduced mustard crude oil percentage.
Intervention effect Autumn sowing increased mustard crude oil yield versus spring sowing.
Intervention effect The maximum mustard seed yield occurred at Tokat under autumn sowing and 50 cm row spacing.
Intervention effect The maximum mustard crude oil yield occurred at Tokat under autumn sowing and 50 cm row spacing.
Recommendation Autumn sowing could also be possible at Ankara, Eskişehir and Isparta locations if plants enter to winter at the right time (8-10 leaves rosette stage).
Recommendation Agronomic performances of mustard at Erzurum was not promising.
Recommendation For autumn and spring sowing, the most suitable row spacing must be 20-30 cm in Ankara, Aydın, Erzurum, Eskişehir, Isparta, Tekirdağ and Şanlıurfa; 50 cm in Tokat in autumn sowing.

Recommendationobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn sowing could also be possible at Ankara, Eskişehir and Isparta locations if plants enter to winter at the right time (8-10 leaves rosette stage).

Taxon: mustardt0
Outcome: Autumn sowinge0

Verbatim

e0
“Autumn sowing could also be possible at Ankara, Eskişehir and Isparta locations if plants enter to winter at the right time (8-10 leaves rosette stage).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1320

t0
“mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.)”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 90–119

Title

Effect of Row Spacing on Yield, Yield Components and Crude Oil of Autumn and Spring Sowed Mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) in Eight Locations of Turkey

Kayaçetin, Fatma; Central Research Institute for Field Crops, Ankara, TURKEY; Önemli, Fadul; Namik Kemal University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, Tekirdağ, TURKEY; Yılmaz, Güngör; Gaziosmanpasa University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, Tokat, TURKEY; et al. DergiPark (Istanbul University)

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Sowing season and row spacing significantly affected yield, yield components and crude oil yield across locations.
Intervention effect Increasing row spacing reduced mustard seed yield.
Intervention effect Increasing row spacing reduced mustard crude oil percentage.
Intervention effect Autumn sowing increased mustard crude oil yield versus spring sowing.
Intervention effect The maximum mustard seed yield occurred at Tokat under autumn sowing and 50 cm row spacing.
Intervention effect The maximum mustard crude oil yield occurred at Tokat under autumn sowing and 50 cm row spacing.
Recommendation autumn sowing was more suitable for Aydın, Tekirdağ, Tokat and Şanlıurfa locations.
Recommendation Agronomic performances of mustard at Erzurum was not promising.
Recommendation For autumn and spring sowing, the most suitable row spacing must be 20-30 cm in Ankara, Aydın, Erzurum, Eskişehir, Isparta, Tekirdağ and Şanlıurfa; 50 cm in Tokat in autumn sowing.

Recommendationobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic performances of mustard at Erzurum was not promising.

Taxon: mustardt0
Outcome: Agronomic performancese0

Verbatim

e0
“Agronomic performances of mustard at Erzurum was not promising.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1384

t0
“mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.)”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 90–119

Title

Effect of Row Spacing on Yield, Yield Components and Crude Oil of Autumn and Spring Sowed Mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) in Eight Locations of Turkey

Kayaçetin, Fatma; Central Research Institute for Field Crops, Ankara, TURKEY; Önemli, Fadul; Namik Kemal University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, Tekirdağ, TURKEY; Yılmaz, Güngör; Gaziosmanpasa University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, Tokat, TURKEY; et al. DergiPark (Istanbul University)

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Sowing season and row spacing significantly affected yield, yield components and crude oil yield across locations.
Intervention effect Increasing row spacing reduced mustard seed yield.
Intervention effect Increasing row spacing reduced mustard crude oil percentage.
Intervention effect Autumn sowing increased mustard crude oil yield versus spring sowing.
Intervention effect The maximum mustard seed yield occurred at Tokat under autumn sowing and 50 cm row spacing.
Intervention effect The maximum mustard crude oil yield occurred at Tokat under autumn sowing and 50 cm row spacing.
Recommendation autumn sowing was more suitable for Aydın, Tekirdağ, Tokat and Şanlıurfa locations.
Recommendation Autumn sowing could also be possible at Ankara, Eskişehir and Isparta locations if plants enter to winter at the right time (8-10 leaves rosette stage).
Recommendation For autumn and spring sowing, the most suitable row spacing must be 20-30 cm in Ankara, Aydın, Erzurum, Eskişehir, Isparta, Tekirdağ and Şanlıurfa; 50 cm in Tokat in autumn sowing.

Recommendationobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

For autumn and spring sowing, the most suitable row spacing must be 20-30 cm in Ankara, Aydın, Erzurum, Eskişehir, Isparta, Tekirdağ and Şanlıurfa; 50 cm in Tokat in autumn sowing.

Taxon: mustardt0
Outcome: most suitable row spacinge0

Verbatim

e0
“For autumn and spring sowing, the most suitable row spacing must be 20-30 cm in Ankara, Aydın, Erzurum, Eskişehir, Isparta, Tekirdağ and Şanlıurfa; 50 cm in Tokat in autumn sowing.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1565

t0
“mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.)”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 90–119

Title

Effect of Row Spacing on Yield, Yield Components and Crude Oil of Autumn and Spring Sowed Mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) in Eight Locations of Turkey

Kayaçetin, Fatma; Central Research Institute for Field Crops, Ankara, TURKEY; Önemli, Fadul; Namik Kemal University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, Tekirdağ, TURKEY; Yılmaz, Güngör; Gaziosmanpasa University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, Tokat, TURKEY; et al. DergiPark (Istanbul University)

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Sowing season and row spacing significantly affected yield, yield components and crude oil yield across locations.
Intervention effect Increasing row spacing reduced mustard seed yield.
Intervention effect Increasing row spacing reduced mustard crude oil percentage.
Intervention effect Autumn sowing increased mustard crude oil yield versus spring sowing.
Intervention effect The maximum mustard seed yield occurred at Tokat under autumn sowing and 50 cm row spacing.
Intervention effect The maximum mustard crude oil yield occurred at Tokat under autumn sowing and 50 cm row spacing.
Recommendation autumn sowing was more suitable for Aydın, Tekirdağ, Tokat and Şanlıurfa locations.
Recommendation Autumn sowing could also be possible at Ankara, Eskişehir and Isparta locations if plants enter to winter at the right time (8-10 leaves rosette stage).
Recommendation Agronomic performances of mustard at Erzurum was not promising.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Manure at 80 kg N/ha and urea at 40 kg N/ha were identified as optimal for quality amaranth production.

Taxon: AmaranthusAmaranthuse1
Outcome: optimum level for the production of quality Amaranthuse1

Verbatim

e1
“This levels (80 kg N/ha for PM and 40 kg N/ha for UF) correspond to the optimum level for the production of quality Amaranthus”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1896–2022

Title

Response of quality, yield and growth of amaranth (Amaranthushybridus) and soil chemical properties on application of organicand inorganic nutrients

Adekiya, A.O; Aremu, C. O.; Olayanju, T.M.A.; et al. Landmark University Repository (Landmark University)

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Poultry manure improved amaranth yield and growth relative to the control.
Intervention effect Urea and manure integration improved amaranth leaf mineral and quality measures relative to the control.
Intervention effect Urea and manure treatments reduced fat content of amaranth leaves relative to control.
Observation Manure produced amaranth yields of 280 kg in 2016 and 310 kg in 2017 at 120 kg N/ha.
Observation Urea produced amaranth yields of 250 kg in 2016 and 247 kg in 2017.
Recommendation The authors recommend integrating urea at 40 kg N/ha with manure at 80 kg N/ha to improve overall quality.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend integrating urea at 40 kg N/ha with manure at 80 kg N/ha to improve overall quality.

Taxon: amaranthAmaranthus caudatust0
Outcome: integrating UF at 40 kg N/ha with PM at 80 kg N/hae1

Verbatim

e1
“For improving the overall quality, integrating UF at 40 kg N/ha with PM at 80 kg N/ha is recommended.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2078–2179

t0
“amaranth (Amaranthushybridus)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–70

Title

Response of quality, yield and growth of amaranth (Amaranthushybridus) and soil chemical properties on application of organicand inorganic nutrients

Adekiya, A.O; Aremu, C. O.; Olayanju, T.M.A.; et al. Landmark University Repository (Landmark University)

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Poultry manure improved amaranth yield and growth relative to the control.
Intervention effect Urea and manure integration improved amaranth leaf mineral and quality measures relative to the control.
Intervention effect Urea and manure treatments reduced fat content of amaranth leaves relative to control.
Observation Manure produced amaranth yields of 280 kg in 2016 and 310 kg in 2017 at 120 kg N/ha.
Observation Urea produced amaranth yields of 250 kg in 2016 and 247 kg in 2017.
Recommendation Manure at 80 kg N/ha and urea at 40 kg N/ha were identified as optimal for quality amaranth production.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend local research into plant nutrition, breeding, variety adaptation and crop rotation.

Outcome: Research in plant nutrition, plant breeding, variety adaptation and crop rotatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“Research in plant nutrition, plant breeding, variety adaptation and crop rotation is urgently needed.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1488

Title

琉球列島における園芸の将来性

Carlson, R.F.; Tomoyose, Choju; R.F, カールスン; et al. Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)

Other claims from this paper (3)

Recommendation 463,767 claims

463,767 claims