Literal values, not normalised. 437,395 distinct spellings cover 11,236,429 claims; only letter case and spacing are merged, so “maize”, “corn” and “Zea mays L.” are three separate entries here. The By organism view merges spellings of one organism through NCBI Taxonomy.
Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
W. coraeensis flowers secreted nectar for 2–3 days while white, then persisted red purple with reduced nectar.
Outcomediscoloured, red purple petals and reduced nectar levels e0 Verbatim
e0 “Flowers of W . coraeensis secreted nectar for initial 2–3 days and remained white, after which they persisted for a few more days with discoloured, red purple petals and reduced nectar levels ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1120 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Bees strongly preferred to visit W. coraeensis.
OutcomeBees strongly preferred to visit e0 Verbatim
e0 “Bees strongly preferred to visit W . coraeensis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1497 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
W. coraeensis had a greater proportion of seed set than W. hortensis.
Outcomeproportion of seed set e0 ComparatorW . hortensis e0 Verbatim
e0 “leading to a greater proportion of seed set than in W . hortensis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1565 e1 “Bees strongly preferred to visit W . coraeensis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1497 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
W. coraeensis had higher nectar productivity than W. hortensis.
Outcomenectar productivity e0 ComparatorW . hortensis e1 Verbatim
e0 “their higher nectar productivity, only W . coraeensis plants offered bees colour difference ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1674 e1 “than in W . hortensis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1565 Other claims from this paper (11) Mechanism author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
W. coraeensis alone offered bees a color cue to choose rewarding flowers and improve nectar intake rates.
Outcomelong‐term and short‐term rates of nectar intake e0 Qualifiercolour difference as a visual cue e0 Verbatim
e0 “only W . coraeensis plants offered bees colour difference as a visual cue to choose rewarding flowers and improve both long‐term and short‐term rates of nectar intake ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1617–1783 Other claims from this paper (11) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Bees apparently learned where to return in response to resource exploitability differences.
Outcomebees apparently responded to the difference in resource exploitability e0 QualifierBy learning where to return e0 Verbatim
e0 “By learning where to return, bees apparently responded to the difference in resource exploitability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1785–1884 e1 “W . coraeensis plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1622–1643 Other claims from this paper (11) Mechanism author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude that floral color change attracts bee-like pollinators that return to more easily exploitable plants.
Interactorbee‐like pollinators e0 pollinator Outcomeattracting bee‐like pollinators e0 Qualifierfloral colour change e0 Verbatim
e0 “floral colour change yields an additional benefit of attracting bee‐like pollinators that return preferentially to more easily exploitable plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1908–2053 e1 “W . coraeensis plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1622–1643 Other claims from this paper (11)