W . coraeensis 7 claims

Literal values, not normalised. 437,395 distinct spellings cover 11,236,429 claims; only letter case and spacing are merged, so “maize”, “corn” and “Zea mays L.” are three separate entries here. The By organism view merges spellings of one organism through NCBI Taxonomy.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W. coraeensis flowers secreted nectar for 2–3 days while white, then persisted red purple with reduced nectar.

Taxon
W . coraeensise0
Organ / stage
Flowerse0
Outcome
discoloured, red purple petals and reduced nectar levelse0
Value
2–3 dayse0

Verbatim

e0

“Flowers of W . coraeensis secreted nectar for initial 2–3 days and remained white, after which they persisted for a few more days with discoloured, red purple petals and reduced nectar levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1120

Title

How does a floral colour‐changing species differ from its non‐colour‐changing congener? – a comparison of trait combinations and their effects on pollination

Miki F. Suzuki; Kazuharu Ohashi Functional Ecology 2013. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12209

Other claims from this paper (11)
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bees strongly preferred to visit W. coraeensis.

Taxon
W . coraeensise0
Interactor
BeesAnthophilae0pollinator
Outcome
Bees strongly preferred to visite0

Verbatim

e0

“Bees strongly preferred to visit W . coraeensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1497

Title

How does a floral colour‐changing species differ from its non‐colour‐changing congener? – a comparison of trait combinations and their effects on pollination

Miki F. Suzuki; Kazuharu Ohashi Functional Ecology 2013. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12209

Other claims from this paper (11)
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W. coraeensis had a greater proportion of seed set than W. hortensis.

Taxon
W . coraeensise1
Interactor
BeesAnthophilae1pollinator
Outcome
proportion of seed sete0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
W . hortensise0

Verbatim

e0

“leading to a greater proportion of seed set than in W . hortensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1565
e1

“Bees strongly preferred to visit W . coraeensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1497

Title

How does a floral colour‐changing species differ from its non‐colour‐changing congener? – a comparison of trait combinations and their effects on pollination

Miki F. Suzuki; Kazuharu Ohashi Functional Ecology 2013. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12209

Other claims from this paper (11)
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W. coraeensis had higher nectar productivity than W. hortensis.

Taxon
W . coraeensise0
Outcome
nectar productivitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
W . hortensise1

Verbatim

e0

“their higher nectar productivity, only W . coraeensis plants offered bees colour difference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1674
e1

“than in W . hortensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1565

Title

How does a floral colour‐changing species differ from its non‐colour‐changing congener? – a comparison of trait combinations and their effects on pollination

Miki F. Suzuki; Kazuharu Ohashi Functional Ecology 2013. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12209

Other claims from this paper (11)
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W. coraeensis alone offered bees a color cue to choose rewarding flowers and improve nectar intake rates.

Taxon
W . coraeensise0
Interactor
beesAnthophilae0pollinator
Outcome
long‐term and short‐term rates of nectar intakee0
Qualifier
colour difference as a visual cuee0

Verbatim

e0

“only W . coraeensis plants offered bees colour difference as a visual cue to choose rewarding flowers and improve both long‐term and short‐term rates of nectar intake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1617–1783

Title

How does a floral colour‐changing species differ from its non‐colour‐changing congener? – a comparison of trait combinations and their effects on pollination

Miki F. Suzuki; Kazuharu Ohashi Functional Ecology 2013. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12209

Other claims from this paper (11)
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bees apparently learned where to return in response to resource exploitability differences.

Taxon
W . coraeensise1
Interactor
beesAnthophilae0pollinator
Outcome
bees apparently responded to the difference in resource exploitabilitye0
Qualifier
By learning where to returne0

Verbatim

e0

“By learning where to return, bees apparently responded to the difference in resource exploitability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1785–1884
e1

“W . coraeensis plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1622–1643

Title

How does a floral colour‐changing species differ from its non‐colour‐changing congener? – a comparison of trait combinations and their effects on pollination

Miki F. Suzuki; Kazuharu Ohashi Functional Ecology 2013. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12209

Other claims from this paper (11)
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that floral color change attracts bee-like pollinators that return to more easily exploitable plants.

Taxon
W . coraeensise1
Interactor
bee‐like pollinatorse0pollinator
Outcome
attracting bee‐like pollinatorse0
Qualifier
floral colour changee0

Verbatim

e0

“floral colour change yields an additional benefit of attracting bee‐like pollinators that return preferentially to more easily exploitable plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1908–2053
e1

“W . coraeensis plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1622–1643

Title

How does a floral colour‐changing species differ from its non‐colour‐changing congener? – a comparison of trait combinations and their effects on pollination

Miki F. Suzuki; Kazuharu Ohashi Functional Ecology 2013. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12209

Other claims from this paper (11)