Observationmodel-written summary

W. hortensis flowers persisted with unchanged color and reduced nectar only when pollinators were scarce.

A claim from How does a floral colour‐changing species differ from its non‐colour‐changing congener? – a comparison of trait combinations and their effects on pollination · 2013

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W. hortensis flowers persisted with unchanged color and reduced nectar only when pollinators were scarce.

Taxon
W . hortensise1
Interactor
pollinatorse0pollinator
Outcome
same colour and reduced amounts of nectare0
Qualifier
only when pollinators were scarcee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue

Verbatim

e0

“They persisted for a few more days with the same colour and reduced amounts of nectar, but did so only when pollinators were scarce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1321
e1

“Flowers of W . hortensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1146

Title

How does a floral colour‐changing species differ from its non‐colour‐changing congener? – a comparison of trait combinations and their effects on pollination

Miki F. Suzuki; Kazuharu Ohashi Functional Ecology 2013. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12209

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-880fc80ad966b40bc3d9ae94043458c1881f07fdaa19c13940ae8965c0eab5e7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer