Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation significantly increased plant dry weight by 15.59, 14.25 and 1.90 per cent at 45, 75 and 120 DAS.

A claim from Effectiveness of micronutrient application and Rhizobium inoculation on growth and yield of Chickpea · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation significantly increased plant dry weight by 15.59, 14.25 and 1.90 per cent at 45, 75 and 120 DAS.

Treatment
Rhizobium sp. inoculatione0
Interactor
Rhizobium sp.Rhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
plant dry weighte0
Direction
increasese0
Value
15.59, 14.25 and 1.90 per cente0

Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizobium sp. inoculation gave significant increases of 33.72, 26.11 and 4.56 per cent in nodule dry weight and 15.59, 14.25 and 1.90 per cent in plant dry weight at 45, 75 and 120 DAS, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–712

Title

Effectiveness of micronutrient application and Rhizobium inoculation on growth and yield of Chickpea

Shrila Das; Navneet Pareek; K.P. Raverkar; et al. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Biotechnology 2012

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-00f83fbc4c3e022e09c0f1cd71948ca5c41c5944f714a2e85289a75fad19a917 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 45 positive, 1 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

inoculation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 135 positive, 17 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

143 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.