Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nano-efficiency fertilizer increased spring maize yield by 10.93%-16.74 % relative to common fertilizer.

A claim from Application Study on Nano-biotechnology in Increasing Yield Benefit of Rice,Maize and Soybean · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-efficiency fertilizer increased spring maize yield by 10.93%-16.74 % relative to common fertilizer.

Taxon
spring maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
nano-efficiency fertilizere0
Outcome
spring maizee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.93%-16.74 %e0
Comparator
common fertilizere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared to common fertilizer,the nano-efficiency fertilizer increased the rice yield of 10.29%,the spring maize of 10.93%-16.74 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–498

Title

Application Study on Nano-biotechnology in Increasing Yield Benefit of Rice,Maize and Soybean

Liu Jian Anhui nongye kexue 2008

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-024b0fc1fd4d5e1c79a00693a2035fd6cf598a4b163c92204a50d13a2c2b9623 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

162 papers: 137 positive, 25 negative or no effect

136 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

153 papers more in this group

See all 162 papers →

nanoparticle · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.