Abstract
[Objective] The research aimed to study the application effects of nano-biotechnology in increasing yield benefit of maize,rice and soybean,provide the basis for the promotion of the nano-efficiency fertilizer.[Method] The increasing yield benefit tests of maize,rice and soybean were made with different test design in different area.[Result] The results showed that compared to common fertilizer,the nano-efficiency fertilizer increased the rice yield of 10.29%,the spring maize of 10.93%-16.74 %,the soybean of 28.81%,and increased the soybean oil content of 13.19%.So the nano-efficiency fertilizer had the function of promoting the maize precocity,and had important significance of cultivating non-genetically modified soybeans.[Conclusion] The study is the new exploration based on multi-crossed disciplines,exploits the new field of nano materials applying in fertilizer.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Nano-efficiency fertilizer increased rice yield by 10.29% relative to common fertilizer.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Treatment
- nano-efficiency fertilizere0
- Outcome
- rice yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 10.29%e0
- Comparator
- common fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“compared to common fertilizer,the nano-efficiency fertilizer increased the rice yield of 10.29%”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano-efficiency fertilizer increased spring maize yield by 10.93%-16.74 % relative to common fertilizer.
- Treatment
- nano-efficiency fertilizere0
- Outcome
- spring maizee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 10.93%-16.74 %e0
- Comparator
- common fertilizere0
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“compared to common fertilizer,the nano-efficiency fertilizer increased the rice yield of 10.29%,the spring maize of 10.93%-16.74 %”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano-efficiency fertilizer increased soybean yield by 28.81% relative to common fertilizer.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- nano-efficiency fertilizere0
- Outcome
- soybeane0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 28.81%e0
- Comparator
- common fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“compared to common fertilizer,the nano-efficiency fertilizer increased the rice yield of 10.29%,the spring maize of 10.93%-16.74 %,the soybean of 28.81%”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano-efficiency fertilizer increased soybean oil content by 13.19%.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- nano-efficiency fertilizere0
- Outcome
- soybean oil contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 13.19%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the nano-efficiency fertilizer increased the rice yield of 10.29%,the spring maize of 10.93%-16.74 %,the soybean of 28.81%,and increased the soybean oil content of 13.19%”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano-efficiency fertilizer promoted maize precocity.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the nano-efficiency fertilizer had the function of promoting the maize precocity”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: oil · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
76 papers more in this group
See all 80 papers →fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
136 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
158 papers more in this group
See all 162 papers →nanoparticle · quality: oil · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →fertilization · organism · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →nanoparticle · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
188 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
198 papers more in this group
See all 202 papers →fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
3,451 papers more in this group
See all 3,455 papers →nanoparticle · organism · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
nanoparticle · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.