Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems

Interplay between nano zinc oxide-coated urea and summer green manuring in basmati rice under basmati rice-wheat cropping system: implications on yield response, nutrient acquisition and grain fortification

Kirttiranjan Baral; Yashbir Singh Shivay; Radha Prasanna; et al.

13
claims
30
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Identifying appropriate nutrient management options is crucial for reversing the yield plateau and enhancing the nutritional status of basmati rice under the basmati rice-wheat cropping system of the Indo Gangetic Plain (IGP). Alternative to the conventional chemical fertilizer, ZnO nanoparticles as carrier material for the micronutrient Zn has shown promise in reducing the bulkiness of fertilizer use in the soil–plant environment. But whether its integration and interaction with an organic source such as green manuring could enrich basmati rice grain with micronutrients and promote protein nutrition is not well investigated. Therefore, we conducted a field experiment during the summer and rainy seasons (April–October) of 2020 and 2021 at the research farm of the ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi in a split-plot design with two summer green manuring (SGM) options ( Sesbania and cowpea, along with fallow) as main plots and six fertilization strategies as subplots: 5 kg Zn ha −1 as bulk ZnO, N at 120 kg N ha −1 as prilled urea (PU), N at 120 kg N ha −1 as PU + 5 kg Zn ha −1 as bulk ZnO, 1% bulk ZnO-coated PU, 0.1% nano ZnO coated PU and 0.2% nano ZnO coated PU replicated thrice. On average, SGM increased basmati rice grain yield by 13.2 and 12.3% during 2020 and 2021, respectively compared to fallow. Integrated application of zinc with urea significantly ( p < 0.05) increased the grain yield of basmati rice by 9.56% and by 10.5% relative to urea without zinc and by 33.7 and 33.8% than the sole application of 5 kg Zn ha −1 through ZnO, respectively during 2020 and 2021. On average, SGM boosted Zn, Cu, Mn, and Fe content in milled rice by 25, 22.38, 20.0, and 18.85% during 2020 and 23.75, 21.4, 19.6, and 13.3% during 2021, respectively compared to fallow. Relative to sole urea application, zinc, and urea together improved the Zn and Fe content in milled rice by 2.99 mg kg −1 and 2.62 mg kg –1, respectively during the first year and by 2.83 mg kg −1 and 2.6 mg kg −1 , respectively during the second year of study. The highest protein content in basmati rice grain was observed when it was grown after Sesbania aculeata residue incorporated plot during both the years and it decreased in the order: Sesbania aculeata > Vigna unguiculata > summer fallow. Our findings revealed that with the application of 1% bulk ZnO coated PU with Sesbania ; the yield response, micronutrient acquisition, and protein accumulation in milled rice was higher than in other plant fertilization methods. However, in plots treated with Sesbania , along with 0.2% nano ZnO-coated PU exhibited statistically equivalent yield and micronutrient loading in edible tissues. Hence, this study unveils the critical role of nano ZnO-coated urea and summer green manuring in elevating micronutrient and protein bioavailability in basmati rice and concurrently reducing Zn dose by 20%, making it a profitable option for farmers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer green manuring (SGM) increased basmati rice grain yield by 13.2% in 2020 and 12.3% in 2021 compared with fallow.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
SGMe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.2 and 12.3%e0
Qualifier
during 2020 and 2021, respectivelye0
Comparator
fallowe0
Setting
field experimente1

Verbatim

e0

“On average, SGM increased basmati rice grain yield by 13.2 and 12.3% during 2020 and 2021, respectively compared to fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1339 · show in text ↑
e1

“we conducted a field experiment during the summer and rainy seasons (April–October) of 2020 and 2021 at the research farm of the ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc with urea increased basmati rice grain yield by 9.56% and 10.5% relative to urea without zinc, significant at p < 0.05.

Taxon
basmati ricee2
Treatment
Integrated application of zinc with ureae2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
9.56% and by 10.5%e2
Qualifier
p < 0.05e2
Comparator
urea without zince2
Setting
field experimente1

Verbatim

e2

“Integrated application of zinc with urea significantly ( p < 0.05) increased the grain yield of basmati rice by 9.56% and by 10.5% relative to urea without zinc and by 33.7 and 33.8% than the sole application of 5 kg Zn ha −1 through ZnO, respectively during 2020 and 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1613 · show in text ↑
e1

“we conducted a field experiment during the summer and rainy seasons (April–October) of 2020 and 2021 at the research farm of the ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc with urea increased basmati rice grain yield by 33.7% and 33.8% relative to the sole application of 5 kg Zn ha-1 as ZnO, significant at p < 0.05.

Taxon
basmati ricee2
Treatment
Integrated application of zinc with ureae2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
33.7 and 33.8%e2
Qualifier
p < 0.05e2
Comparator
sole application of 5 kg Zn ha −1 through ZnOe2
Setting
field experimente1

Verbatim

e2

“Integrated application of zinc with urea significantly ( p < 0.05) increased the grain yield of basmati rice by 9.56% and by 10.5% relative to urea without zinc and by 33.7 and 33.8% than the sole application of 5 kg Zn ha −1 through ZnO, respectively during 2020 and 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1613 · show in text ↑
e1

“we conducted a field experiment during the summer and rainy seasons (April–October) of 2020 and 2021 at the research farm of the ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SGM boosted Zn content in milled basmati rice by 25% in 2020 and 23.75% in 2021 compared with fallow.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
SGMe3
Outcome
content in milled ricee3
Direction
boostede3
Value
25e3
Qualifier
Zne3
Comparator
fallowe3
Setting
field experimente1

Verbatim

e0

“On average, SGM increased basmati rice grain yield by 13.2 and 12.3% during 2020 and 2021, respectively compared to fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1339 · show in text ↑
e3

“On average, SGM boosted Zn, Cu, Mn, and Fe content in milled rice by 25, 22.38, 20.0, and 18.85% during 2020 and 23.75, 21.4, 19.6, and 13.3% during 2021, respectively compared to fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1801 · show in text ↑
e1

“we conducted a field experiment during the summer and rainy seasons (April–October) of 2020 and 2021 at the research farm of the ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SGM boosted Cu content in milled basmati rice by 22.38% in 2020 and 21.4% in 2021 compared with fallow.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
SGMe3
Outcome
content in milled ricee3
Direction
boostede3
Value
22.38e3
Qualifier
Cue3
Comparator
fallowe3
Setting
field experimente1

Verbatim

e0

“On average, SGM increased basmati rice grain yield by 13.2 and 12.3% during 2020 and 2021, respectively compared to fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1339 · show in text ↑
e3

“On average, SGM boosted Zn, Cu, Mn, and Fe content in milled rice by 25, 22.38, 20.0, and 18.85% during 2020 and 23.75, 21.4, 19.6, and 13.3% during 2021, respectively compared to fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1801 · show in text ↑
e1

“we conducted a field experiment during the summer and rainy seasons (April–October) of 2020 and 2021 at the research farm of the ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SGM boosted Mn content in milled basmati rice by 20.0% in 2020 and 19.6% in 2021 compared with fallow.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
SGMe3
Outcome
content in milled ricee3
Direction
boostede3
Value
20.0e3
Qualifier
Mne3
Comparator
fallowe3
Setting
field experimente1

Verbatim

e0

“On average, SGM increased basmati rice grain yield by 13.2 and 12.3% during 2020 and 2021, respectively compared to fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1339 · show in text ↑
e3

“On average, SGM boosted Zn, Cu, Mn, and Fe content in milled rice by 25, 22.38, 20.0, and 18.85% during 2020 and 23.75, 21.4, 19.6, and 13.3% during 2021, respectively compared to fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1801 · show in text ↑
e1

“we conducted a field experiment during the summer and rainy seasons (April–October) of 2020 and 2021 at the research farm of the ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SGM boosted Fe content in milled basmati rice by 18.85% in 2020 and 13.3% in 2021 compared with fallow.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
SGMe3
Outcome
content in milled ricee3
Direction
boostede3
Value
18.85e3
Qualifier
Fee3
Comparator
fallowe3
Setting
field experimente1

Verbatim

e0

“On average, SGM increased basmati rice grain yield by 13.2 and 12.3% during 2020 and 2021, respectively compared to fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1339 · show in text ↑
e3

“On average, SGM boosted Zn, Cu, Mn, and Fe content in milled rice by 25, 22.38, 20.0, and 18.85% during 2020 and 23.75, 21.4, 19.6, and 13.3% during 2021, respectively compared to fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1801 · show in text ↑
e1

“we conducted a field experiment during the summer and rainy seasons (April–October) of 2020 and 2021 at the research farm of the ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc and urea together improved Zn content in milled basmati rice by 2.99 mg kg-1 in the first year and 2.83 mg kg-1 in the second year relative to sole urea.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
zinc, and urea togethere4
Outcome
content in milled ricee4
Direction
improvede4
Value
2.99 mg kg −1e4
Qualifier
Zne4
Comparator
sole urea applicatione4
Setting
field experimente1

Verbatim

e0

“On average, SGM increased basmati rice grain yield by 13.2 and 12.3% during 2020 and 2021, respectively compared to fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1339 · show in text ↑
e4

“Relative to sole urea application, zinc, and urea together improved the Zn and Fe content in milled rice by 2.99 mg kg −1 and 2.62 mg kg –1, respectively during the first year and by 2.83 mg kg −1 and 2.6 mg kg −1 , respectively during the second year of study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1803–2063 · show in text ↑
e1

“we conducted a field experiment during the summer and rainy seasons (April–October) of 2020 and 2021 at the research farm of the ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc and urea together improved Fe content in milled basmati rice by 2.62 mg kg-1 in the first year and 2.6 mg kg-1 in the second year relative to sole urea.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
zinc, and urea togethere4
Outcome
content in milled ricee4
Direction
improvede4
Value
2.62 mg kg –1e4
Qualifier
Fee4
Comparator
sole urea applicatione4
Setting
field experimente1

Verbatim

e0

“On average, SGM increased basmati rice grain yield by 13.2 and 12.3% during 2020 and 2021, respectively compared to fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1339 · show in text ↑
e4

“Relative to sole urea application, zinc, and urea together improved the Zn and Fe content in milled rice by 2.99 mg kg −1 and 2.62 mg kg –1, respectively during the first year and by 2.83 mg kg −1 and 2.6 mg kg −1 , respectively during the second year of study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1803–2063 · show in text ↑
e1

“we conducted a field experiment during the summer and rainy seasons (April–October) of 2020 and 2021 at the research farm of the ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesbania aculeata residue incorporation gave the highest protein content in basmati rice grain, above Vigna unguiculata and summer fallow, in both years.

Taxon
basmati ricee5
Treatment
Sesbania aculeata residue incorporated plote5
Outcome
protein contente5
Direction
higheste5
Qualifier
decreased in the order: Sesbania aculeata > Vigna unguiculata > summer fallowe5
Comparator
summer fallowe5

Verbatim

e5

“The highest protein content in basmati rice grain was observed when it was grown after Sesbania aculeata residue incorporated plot during both the years and it decreased in the order: Sesbania aculeata > Vigna unguiculata > summer fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2065–2302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulk ZnO-coated urea with Sesbania gave higher yield response, micronutrient acquisition and protein accumulation in milled rice than other fertilization methods.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
1% bulk ZnO coated PU with Sesbaniae6
Outcome
yield response, micronutrient acquisition, and protein accumulation in milled ricee6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
other plant fertilization methodse6

Verbatim

e6

“Our findings revealed that with the application of 1% bulk ZnO coated PU with Sesbania ; the yield response, micronutrient acquisition, and protein accumulation in milled rice was higher than in other plant fertilization methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2304–2532 · show in text ↑
e0

“On average, SGM increased basmati rice grain yield by 13.2 and 12.3% during 2020 and 2021, respectively compared to fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1339 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

With Sesbania, 0.2% nano ZnO-coated urea gave statistically equivalent yield and micronutrient loading in edible tissues.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
0.2% nano ZnO-coated PUe7
Outcome
yield and micronutrient loading in edible tissuese7
Direction
statistically equivalente7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e7

“However, in plots treated with Sesbania , along with 0.2% nano ZnO-coated PU exhibited statistically equivalent yield and micronutrient loading in edible tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2534–2695 · show in text ↑
e0

“On average, SGM increased basmati rice grain yield by 13.2 and 12.3% during 2020 and 2021, respectively compared to fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1339 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Nano ZnO-coated urea with summer green manuring is recommended for basmati rice because it allows reducing Zn dose by 20%.

Taxon
basmati ricee0
Treatment
nano ZnO-coated urea and summer green manuringe0
Outcome
reducing Zn dose by 20%e0
Value
20%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Hence, this study unveils the critical role of nano ZnO-coated urea and summer green manuring in elevating micronutrient and protein bioavailability in basmati rice and concurrently reducing Zn dose by 20%, making it a profitable option for farmers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2697–2945 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

419 papers: 389 positive, 30 negative or no effect

388 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

415 papers more in this group

See all 419 papers →

zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 45 positive, 8 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Sesbania bispinosa · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

zinc oxide · molecular: expression · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: expression · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 29 positive, 16 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 86 positive, 35 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 189 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 189 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

219 papers: 199 positive, 20 negative or no effect

198 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

215 papers more in this group

See all 219 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.