Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zinc nanoparticles raised grain yield by 4.5% over potassium silicate.

A claim from Silicon and Zinc Improves Grain Yield and Nutrient Status in Rice When Supplied During the Different Growth Stages · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc nanoparticles raised grain yield by 4.5% over potassium silicate.

Treatment
Zn nanoparticlese0t0
Outcome
grain yielde0t0
Direction
increasede0t0
Value
4.5%e0t0
Comparator
potassium silicatee0t0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Si and Zn nanoparticles increased the grain yield by 7.4 and 4.5%, respectively, above the potassium silicate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1161
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65

Title

Silicon and Zinc Improves Grain Yield and Nutrient Status in Rice When Supplied During the Different Growth Stages

Mehrdad Sheykhzadeh; Hamidreza Mobasser; Elyas Rahimi Petrodi; et al. Romanian Agricultural Research 2022. doi:10.59665/rar3934

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-d850bc7b4ddbb55cc786a23301f7e226fae04ea0ae1c7dcbe67e4eee1101ebc6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

419 papers: 389 positive, 30 negative or no effect

388 papers in the same direction as this claim · 28 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

410 papers more in this group

See all 419 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 189 positive, 13 negative or no effect

188 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

193 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.