Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Higher Fe concentration inhibited concentrations and contents of almost all macro and micronutrients.

A claim from Tolerance of rice cultivars to iron toxicity · 1987

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher Fe concentration inhibited concentrations and contents of almost all macro and micronutrients.

Treatment
Higher concentration of Fe in the nutrient solutione1
Outcome
concentrations and contents of almost all macro and micronutrientse1
Direction
inhibitinge1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tolerance of rice cultivars to iron toxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–44
e1

“Higher concentration of Fe in the nutrient solution exerted an inhibiting effect on the concentrations and contents of almost all macro and micronutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1071

Title

Tolerance of rice cultivars to iron toxicity

N.K. Fageria; N. A. Rabelo Journal of Plant Nutrition 1987. doi:10.1080/01904168709363598

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-26b0eb7f940ff4de8b8eb119b1d4b9375894e3289c861abf30ee2ab21799d368 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

iron atom · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 18 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

219 papers: 199 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this claim · 199 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

210 papers more in this group

See all 219 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.