Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Skipping the third irrigation did not significantly affect chlorophyll a or chlorophyll b.

A claim from Physiological, Biochemical and Agronomic Response of Some Flax Cultivars to Water Deficit under Clay Soil Conditions in North Delta · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Skipping the third irrigation did not significantly affect chlorophyll a or chlorophyll b.

Treatment
two irrigations after sowing irrigation (irrig1 treatment)e0
Outcome
chlorophyll a , chlorophyll be0
Comparator
three irrigations after sowing irrigation (control treatment)e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–62
e0

“chlorophyll a , chlorophyll b , relative water content and proline, were not significalty affected with decreasing number of irrigations to two irrigations after sowing irrigation (irrig1 treatment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–845
e1

“three irrigations after sowing irrigation (control treatment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–397

Title

Physiological, Biochemical and Agronomic Response of Some Flax Cultivars to Water Deficit under Clay Soil Conditions in North Delta

Amal El-Borhamy; Rania Khedr; Mona El-Mansoury Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches/Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches 2022. doi:10.21608/jalexu.2022.139346.1065

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-034141fcac143f2ee244578246900a960595eab8b9cecbaa18d5c9ec47c4b38f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer