Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Row inter-cropping gave greater green fodder and dry-matter yields of cowpea.

A claim from Pest management in fodder cowpea(Vigna unguiculataL. Walp.) through mixed‐and inter‐cropping in India · 1989

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row inter-cropping gave greater green fodder and dry-matter yields of cowpea.

Treatment
inter‐crop between rowse2
Outcome
green fodder and dry‐matter yieldse2
Direction
Greatere2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pest management in fodder cowpea(Vigna unguiculataL. Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–59
e2

“Greater green fodder and dry‐matter yields of cowpea were obtained in inter‐crop between rows and in mixed‐crop, within row farming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–435

Title

Pest management in fodder cowpea(Vigna unguiculataL. Walp.) through mixed‐and inter‐cropping in India

Shri Ram; M. P. Gupta; B. D. Patil Tropical Pest Management 1989. doi:10.1080/09670878909371399

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-03dfd58c81d4ebcc055fbc74a9026e5e057c0f5a7dcb2fc52ec1ff069abe2036 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

103 papers: 63 positive, 40 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this claim · 33 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

94 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.