Intervention effectmodel-written summary

40 kg P2O5/ha significantly increased uptake of N, P and K of urdbean.

A claim from Integrated phosphorus management on yield and nutrient uptake of urdbean under rainfed conditions of southern Rajasthan · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

40 kg P2O5/ha significantly increased uptake of N, P and K of urdbean.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungoe0
Treatment
40 kg P2O5/hae0
Outcome
uptake of N, P and Ke0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of FYM @ 5 t/ha, 40 kg P2O5/ha and dual seed inoculation with PSB + VAM significantly increased the seed and stover yield and uptake of N, P and K by urdbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–423

Title

Integrated phosphorus management on yield and nutrient uptake of urdbean under rainfed conditions of southern Rajasthan

D. S. Rathore; H. S. Purohit; B. L. Yadav Journal of Food Legumes 2010

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-05015bfa8b5cd90d89556dd5f351ed5fe9a524b8a572f2ca361939a90ae2388b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Phosphorus dosing did not significantly affect soil sulphur.

    Effect of phosphorus and sulphur application on their dynamics and nodulation in soil under black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] crop · 2019

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    At 60 kg P2O5 ha-1, phosphorus reached 0.356 %.

    Growth, yield and nutrient content of blackgram (Vigna mungo) as influenced by levels of phosphorus, sulphur and Phosphorus Solubilizing Bacteria · 2014 · compared with lower levels

    Same direction

  3. positive
    Phosphorus up to 40 kg/ha significantly increased N, P and K concentration in grain and straw.

    Effect of Phosphorus and Bio-fertilizers on Yield, Nutrient Content and Uptake of Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper] · 2017 · compared with preceding levels

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Bacterial seed inoculation increased nitrogen and phosphorus uptake relative to no inoculation.

    Effect of biofertilizer and phosphorus levels on yield attributes, yield and quality of urdbean (Vigna mungo) · 2001 · compared with uninoculated treatment

    Same direction

  5. positive
    N and P content and uptake in grain and straw increased significantly up to 60 kg P2O5/ha of phosphorus.

    EFFECT OF PHOSPHORUS AND BIOFERTILIZERS ON YIELD, NUTRIENT CONTENT AND UPTAKE BY BLACK GRAM [VIGNA MUNGO (L.) HEPPER] · 2003

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Nutrient treatment with Rhizobium, PSB and manure increased soil potassium, sulfur and zinc.

    Effect of integrated nutrient management on productivity, soil fertility and economics of blackgram (Vigna mungo) varieties under rainfed condition · 2015 · compared with rest of the treatments

    Same direction

  7. positive
    VBN8 with 150% N, full P and K and nipping at 25 DAS showed higher N, P and K uptake.

    Response of Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) Cultivars for Nipping and Graded Levels of Nitrogen for Higher Productivity under Irrigated Conditions · 2024

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Applying 40 kg P2O5 per hectare increased N concentration of blackgram plants by 0.35 g kg-1 over 20 kg P2O5 per hectare.

    Synergism Among VA Mycorrhiza,Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria and Rhizobium for Symbiosis with Blackgram（Vigna mungo L.） Under Field Conditions · 2001 · compared with 20 kg P2O5 ha-1

    Same direction

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.