Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Wheat yield and net returns were greatest for half-rate split imazamethabenz applications in both years.

A claim from Low-Rate Split-Applied Herbicide Treatments for Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Control in Wheat (Triticum aestivum)1 · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield and net returns were greatest for half-rate split imazamethabenz applications in both years.

Treatment
half-rate split applications of imazamethabenze0
Outcome
Wheat yield and net returnse0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
in both yearse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat yield and net returns were greatest for half-rate split applications of imazamethabenz and ICIA 0604 in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–918

Title

Low-Rate Split-Applied Herbicide Treatments for Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Control in Wheat (Triticum aestivum)1

BRADFORD K. RAMSDALE; CALVIN G. MESSERSMITH Weed Technology 2002. doi:10.1614/0890-037x(2002)016[0149:lrsaht]2.0.co;2

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-0594058e10d997185c50ba398a737e4756b19a44851a70346bf2783dc56c69de · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

imazamethabenz · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.