Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cutting once gave the highest dry forage yield of 20.20 t ha-1.

A claim from Effect of row spacing and cutting times on forage yiel in some sorghum varieties (sorghum bicolor L. Moench) · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting once gave the highest dry forage yield of 20.20 t ha-1.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
Cutting oncee0
Outcome
dry forage yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
20.20e0
Comparator
cutting twicee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cutting once gave highest green and dry forage yield (86.71, 20.20) and (65.07, 14.35) t ha-1 except Rabih variety which showed highest green forage yield at cutting twice (136.66)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1520
e1

“sorghum varieties (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–101

Title

Effect of row spacing and cutting times on forage yiel in some sorghum varieties (sorghum bicolor L. Moench)

Mustafa. ,B.S; Sadalla .,H.A ZANCO Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences 2021. doi:10.21271/zjpas.33.s1.12

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-072db5f2644ead4eafc99ce17e5c7da7a46ae7bd9c7040914ea1ba57f52c0448 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

pruning · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

29 papers: 16 positive, 13 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.