Paper · 2021 · Agricultural science Euro-North-East

Biological basis of sorghum cultivation in the North-West of the Non-Chernozem zone

Elena P. Shkodina

15
claims
28
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The need to restore the dairy cattle population and the feed base in the North-West region of the Russian Federation requires new sources of feed with high yield and nutritional values. The purpose of the research is to study the possibility of sugar sorghum introduction into the region for forage use. The research was conducted in 2017-2020 in the conditions of the Novgorod region. On plots with an area of 10 m 2 in the third decade of May sugar sorghum was sown: a hybrid of the first generation Silosnoe 88, the Galia variety, the Laretz line. The predecessors were potato (2017, 2018, 2020) and vetch and oat mix (2019). The ability of sugar sorghum to stop developing and hibernate in unfavorable weather conditions, resuming vegetation when the weather improves, has been established. Intensive plant growth was observed at the end of July-August with the average daily growth of 1.9-5.0 cm. By the end of August, the plant height reached 245-280 cm, the yield of green mass was 110 t/ha (hybrid Silosnoe 88), 139.2 t/ha (variety Galia), 136 t/ha (Laretz line). In the extreme conditions of 2017, the yield of sorghum green mass was 21 t/ha. The yield of dry matter (DM) from 1 ha reached 6.8-13.4 t/ha. The protein content in the DM was 8.4-11.5 %, the yield of feed units was 0.76-0.82 kg/kg, the output of exchange energy was 9.7-10.1 MJ/kg. Sugar sorghum has an ability to grow back after mowing; in the conditions of the Novgorod region, the yield of green mass from two mowing (end of July, August-September) was lower (23.3-46.7 t/ha) than from the one at the end of August-September (44.3-139.2 t/ha). The Laretz line vegetation phases began 5-27 days later than those of the Silosnoe 88 hybrid and Galiya variety. The growing season of sugar sorghum ended in the phase of “heading of panicles - flowering”. Thus, a high plasticity and adaptability of sorghum varieties to unfavorable climatic conditions of the zone and their prospects for use in forage production have been established.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar sorghum paused development in unfavorable weather and resumed vegetation when weather improved.

Taxon
sugar sorghume0
Outcome
stop developing and hibernatee0
Qualifier
in unfavorable weather conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“The ability of sugar sorghum to stop developing and hibernate in unfavorable weather conditions, resuming vegetation when the weather improves, has been established.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–794 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average daily growth at the end of July-August was 1.9-5.0 cm.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
average daily growthe0
Value
1.9-5.0 cme0
Qualifier
at the end of July-Auguste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intensive plant growth was observed at the end of July-August with the average daily growth of 1.9-5.0 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–901 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height reached 245-280 cm by the end of August.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Value
245-280 cme0
Qualifier
By the end of Auguste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By the end of August, the plant height reached 245-280 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silosnoe 88 green mass yield was 110 t/ha.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Material
hybrid Silosnoe 88e0
Outcome
yield of green masse0
Value
110 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield of green mass was 110 t/ha (hybrid Silosnoe 88)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Galia green mass yield was 139.2 t/ha.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Material
variety Galiae0
Outcome
green masse1
Value
139.2 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“139.2 t/ha (variety Galia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1046 · show in text ↑
e1

“the yield of green mass was 110 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Laretz green mass yield was 136 t/ha.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Material
Laretz linee0
Outcome
green masse1
Value
136 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“136 t/ha (Laretz line)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1070 · show in text ↑
e1

“the yield of green mass was 110 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extreme conditions in 2017 yielded 21 t/ha of sorghum green mass.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Outcome
yield of sorghum green masse0
Value
21 t/hae0
Qualifier
extreme conditions of 2017e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the extreme conditions of 2017, the yield of sorghum green mass was 21 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter yield reached 6.8-13.4 t/ha.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
yield of dry mattere0
Value
6.8-13.4 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of dry matter (DM) from 1 ha reached 6.8-13.4 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1213 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter protein content was 8.4-11.5 %.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
protein content in the DMe0
Value
8.4-11.5 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The protein content in the DM was 8.4-11.5 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Feed unit yield was 0.76-0.82 kg/kg.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
yield of feed unitse0
Value
0.76-0.82 kg/kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield of feed units was 0.76-0.82 kg/kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1303 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exchange energy output was 9.7-10.1 MJ/kg.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
output of exchange energye0
Value
9.7-10.1 MJ/kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the output of exchange energy was 9.7-10.1 MJ/kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1353 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two mowings yielded less green mass than one late mowing.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
two mowinge0
Outcome
yield of green masse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
23.3-46.7 t/hae0
Qualifier
44.3-139.2 t/hae0
Comparator
the one at the end of August-Septembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield of green mass from two mowing (end of July, August-September) was lower (23.3-46.7 t/ha) than from the one at the end of August-September (44.3-139.2 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1618 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Laretz vegetation phases began 5-27 days later than Silosnoe 88 and Galiya.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Material
Laretz linee0
Outcome
vegetation phasese0
Direction
latere0
Value
5-27 dayse0
Comparator
Silosnoe 88 hybrid and Galiya varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Laretz line vegetation phases began 5-27 days later than those of the Silosnoe 88 hybrid and Galiya variety.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1620–1732 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The growing season ended at heading of panicles to flowering.

Taxon
sugar sorghume0
Organ / stage
heading of panicles - floweringe0
Outcome
ended in the phase of “heading of panicles - flowering”e0

Verbatim

e0

“The growing season of sugar sorghum ended in the phase of “heading of panicles - flowering”.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1733–1825 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

29 papers: 16 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.